|
03-28-2021, 03:18 AM | #11 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: CA/Iowa
Posts: 106
Likes: 71
Liked 11 Times in 7 Posts
|
Re: 2002 F body brake pressure
Tom My car was plumbed backwards initially causing excess pressure on the rear brakes. I bent the backing plates before I changed the lines around. Mine has front disc with drum rear. Hard to find good help
|
03-28-2021, 08:09 PM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Pierce NE
Posts: 902
Likes: 53
Liked 303 Times in 106 Posts
|
Re: 2002 F body brake pressure
Thanks for all the help. Tom
__________________
Tom Meyer 5240 SS Stock ??? |
03-29-2021, 11:17 AM | #13 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 177
Likes: 21
Liked 300 Times in 48 Posts
|
Re: 2002 F body brake pressure
When we ran an automatic, we had dual rear caliper Mark Williams brakes (and MW in front as well) and would put about 750psi of brake pressure (on a gauge in the car) - and that would hold 43-4500rpm without issue. On the 2-step the car wouldn't move at all either in the front or the rear no matter how loose we had the front or rear shocks. The brakes held the car rock solid. I'm not sure about the master cylinder, but I assume it was whatever Mike Pustelny from MPR Race Cars would suggest.
|
03-29-2021, 10:32 PM | #14 |
Member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: E TN
Posts: 444
Likes: 14
Liked 109 Times in 63 Posts
|
Re: 2002 F body brake pressure
Was it a step bore master cylinder? If the master cylinder has the same size bore for both sections how can it have more pressure at one port? Did you measure the frt. and back pressure with a gauge?
|
|
|