|
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 362
Likes: 6
Liked 302 Times in 73 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
I get that, but would you run a set of heads you knew flowed less air intentionally knowing the TB and intake may be a restriction larger than the heads or would you put the "best" flowing heads on regardless? I think I'm more curious as to what people are more concerned with if area under the curve is similar between 2 sets of heads. Having the larger peak numbers or giving up a little up top to have much better down low numbers. Obviously there are other factors to consider... mainly possible restrictions before the port and then the relation to exhaust port flow as mentioned in the next reply. But at this point for a simplistic questions and answer.. would you prefer a head that peak flows more or flows down low more given the overall "area under the flow curve" is generally equal. Billy seems to lean towards low flow potentially with his response. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Glendale, Arizona
Posts: 3,040
Likes: 712
Liked 1,568 Times in 579 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Having the baseline number from the intake allowed me to then work on the heads, knowing the Delta the intake would effect on the cylinder heads. The brand of valves makes a difference the same as the cut and angles. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|