|
|
![]() |
#1 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 1,763
Likes: 1,197
Liked 1,955 Times in 492 Posts
|
![]()
This does not apply any more, the left has given every numbnut that wants to identify as a unicorn the ability to sue a business owner if they don't cave to someone else's beliefs!
__________________
Todd Greene |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Upper Holland, PA
Posts: 423
Likes: 27
Liked 216 Times in 88 Posts
|
![]()
Huh?
__________________
Jim Samuel |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: London Ontario
Posts: 515
Likes: 40
Liked 262 Times in 74 Posts
|
![]()
Well, that's not really true. It's so you cannot deny service based on someone's religion or sexual preference. The "No Shoes, No shirt, No service" is a safety and hygiene issue, and nobody wants the sweaty/hairy guy in the grocery store without a shirt lol
__________________
Steve Polhill 3520 STOCK, COMP |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
|
|