|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
![]()
I heard from a reliable source it was for altering the intake casting number, and booster modifications, not the head at all.
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#2 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times in 4 Posts
|
![]()
That could explain why an intake and carburator was seen being carried into the tech trailer.
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#3 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Cucamonga, CA
Posts: 1,522
Likes: 148
Liked 229 Times in 99 Posts
|
![]()
Break out the pop corn. This might get good.
__________________
Floyd Staggs 787 SST |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#4 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Lakewood Washington
Posts: 1,407
Likes: 29
Liked 237 Times in 126 Posts
|
![]()
For everyone's info, the "D-" at the end of a Ford casting number is a revision suffix. DA is the original head. When an engineering change is made to the part the last letter of the suffix is moved down the alphabet. DC heads have had two changes made to them. They may cc the same, but something has been changed. I think that when the suffix was changed, the factory published HP rating stayed the same. NHRA decided they could document the HP of the DA head but not the others and edited the guide to recognize only the DA as legal. Very difficult to build a 1977 Ford 302 stocker.
'77 Chevy 305/145 has three head castings listed '68 Chevy 327/350 has seven. I have a Root Beer in the 'fridge...
__________________
Dale Shearon 68 Mustang 6394 |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#5 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,809
Likes: 2,900
Liked 5,113 Times in 1,948 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
So what?
__________________
"We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for." Will Rogers |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#6 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,486
Likes: 3,587
Liked 7,683 Times in 1,731 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
If there has been a change in that policy, I'd sure like to know!
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS I'm not spending 100K to win 2K |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#7 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Coarsegold, CA
Posts: 1,016
Likes: 57
Liked 320 Times in 102 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
I don't want to get pissy, BUT, so it's OK to polish the secondary bores on a Q-Jet, grind off all of the casting flash, remove he choke plate and machine off the choke horn???? CARBURETOR Must be correct year, make, and model specified for car’s engine; fuel or air bleed passages may be resized. Drilling idle holes in primary throttle blades permitted. Other modifications prohibited. Sandblasting, grinding, flash removal, dry film coating, or any other modification to carburetors prohibited. Replacement carburetors permitted provided they are same model, type, throttle bore, and venturi size. Computer carburetors use latest model non-computer carb for engine application. Doesn't look like it to me, but on the other hand...…. WTF do I know????
__________________
Bob Mulry 7516 STK A & M Motorsports Last edited by Bob Mulry; 09-04-2019 at 05:44 PM. Reason: add wtf |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 881
Likes: 206
Liked 309 Times in 173 Posts
|
![]()
You may be correct, but don't you think an official should drop the hammer if he sees a funky casting number mod? Of course. They are looking, maybe not checking.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,486
Likes: 3,587
Liked 7,683 Times in 1,731 Posts
|
![]()
NHRA hasn't checked carb #s for years!
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS I'm not spending 100K to win 2K |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: phoenix
Posts: 1,486
Likes: 66
Liked 704 Times in 281 Posts
|
![]()
How about intake numbers altered or otherwise?
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
|
|