HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-19-2019, 11:35 PM   #1
Dan Fahey
VIP Member
 
Dan Fahey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,128
Likes: 1,084
Liked 184 Times in 113 Posts
Default Re: 85 5.0 Mustangs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark Yacavone View Post
Nice Fox.
Only one problem. It's so far away from a Stocker, it's not even funny.
I read and listened.
Not that far away or expensive...!
It is a Nice clean car !
Dan Fahey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2019, 10:17 AM   #2
black88coupe
Member
 
black88coupe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 352
Likes: 18
Liked 19 Times in 12 Posts
Default Re: 85 5.0 Mustangs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Fahey View Post
It is a Nice clean car !
Thanks Dan
__________________
Mitch Beri- The Motor City
1985 GT- “Stock-ish” 5.0 motor, AOD/ trans brake. 12.68 @ 101.31mph.
https://www.facebook.com/groups/FOXBODYFLEAMARKET/
black88coupe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2019, 06:51 PM   #3
Gary Summers
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Liked 46 Times in 12 Posts
Default Re: 85 5.0 Mustangs

The 86 e5ae heads were a 1 year deal but they mage 2 different versions the ones that were put on 302-s hade 7/16 bolt holes and the ones that went on 351-s had 1/2 inch bolt holes but everything else is the same but either way they are junk they will not flow even close to what nhra says because of the pollution junk that's cast in them
Gary Summers is offline   Reply With Quote
Liked
Old 05-20-2019, 09:03 PM   #4
Gary Summers
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Liked 46 Times in 12 Posts
Default Re: 85 5.0 Mustangs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gary Summers View Post
The 86 e5ae heads were a 1 year deal but they mage 2 different versions the ones that were put on 302-s hade 7/16 bolt holes and the ones that went on 351-s had 1/2 inch bolt holes but everything else is the same but either way they are junk they will not flow even close to what nhra says because of the pollution junk that's cast in them
I hit the wrong key suppose to be 85
Gary Summers is offline   Reply With Quote
Liked
Old 05-22-2019, 09:18 AM   #5
Bobby Fazio
VIP Member
 
Bobby Fazio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Egg Harbor Township, NJ
Posts: 1,472
Likes: 1,463
Liked 4,388 Times in 504 Posts
Default Re: 85 5.0 Mustangs

Hi Slickfoot I am happy to answer any questions you have about 87-93 mustang just send me a PM. Thanks.
__________________
'65 Mustang SS/L & L/SA
DriverInterviews.com | App.DragInsights.com
Bobby Fazio is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:05 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.