|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,789
Likes: 2,878
Liked 5,076 Times in 1,935 Posts
|
![]()
__________________
"We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for." Will Rogers |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Northern New Jersey suburbs
Posts: 2,314
Likes: 25
Liked 544 Times in 213 Posts
|
![]()
Mark, newer Onan V twins(air cooled) engines are built by Subaru-Robin from what I know...…..They are 60 degree overhead valve engines used in 5.5 and 7 kw RV generators. Valve lash spec is .002-.003...
They usually get loose on the lash and not tight. They routinely fail from heat working on the valves, springs, guides and eventually the guides get loose in the head. Real bad problem on those. I replace heads on them all the time...….The hotter they run the quicker and more likely the guide problem will happen.....And owners that don't change the oil often enough. 2 quarts is all they hold.
__________________
Rich Biebel S/C 1479 Stock 147R Last edited by Rich Biebel; 02-13-2019 at 08:01 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 100
Likes: 5
Liked 81 Times in 26 Posts
|
![]()
I ran my 327/275 stocker engine with plugged hydraulics at .005 lash cold. It did not like any tighter.
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#4 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Glendale, Arizona
Posts: 3,036
Likes: 710
Liked 1,538 Times in 575 Posts
|
![]()
The ramps on camshafts on hydraulic and solid cams are designed differently for many reasons.
Due to the various ramp and lobe designs in Stock Eliminator such as dwell and non-dwell lobes, when you plan to switch from hydraulic to solid, the best is to talk to the camshaft designer at the camshaft company; not the salesperson. If you are building a new engine, just have a new camshaft made for use with solid lifters. It will have the proper area under the curve and also, with the right lobe, you can create lofting that will provide the engine with more lift than what the actual cam was physically designed with. Yes, due to the dynamics of a solid lifter, they tend to make more power and RPM quicker when compared to a normal hydraulic lifter only if the valvetrain geometry has been optimized. When I say normal hydraulic I am not talking about a restricted travel or blocked hydraulic lifter. Also, a solid lifter will be lighter than a hydraulic counterpart. I always recommend EDM drilled solid lifters that are DLC coated, installed with the proper lifter bore clearance. Many years ago during a conversation with Don Tweles at General Kinetics, he shared that his dwell lobes could be run 0.006 ~ 0.010 with solid lifters. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Woodlawn IL
Posts: 1,092
Likes: 162
Liked 216 Times in 77 Posts
|
![]()
Thank You to everybody who replied since I revived this thread. I'm going to give it a try. I've got to do something to find some ET. Hopefully this, a 200 transmission and a couple other things will help get me going In the right direction.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 655
Likes: 8
Liked 244 Times in 26 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|