|
![]() |
#1 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Pontiac,il.
Posts: 1,192
Likes: 272
Liked 950 Times in 189 Posts
|
![]()
Looking for a block for my next 265 build.Which one was the best to use back in the day? Yes I know a Bow Tie would be the one to use,but the lottery hasn't paid me off yet.LOL. I've heard stories about the 57 block being a lot thicker in the deck area, so i'm looking around for one of those.I think it has a casting that number ends in 548 .
Last edited by Lyn Smith; 01-07-2019 at 07:33 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 569
Likes: 36
Liked 53 Times in 38 Posts
|
![]()
I got a 55 (265 3 speed) under 140 tons of dirt if you like digging. Of course it's been there 45 years
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Pontiac,il.
Posts: 1,192
Likes: 272
Liked 950 Times in 189 Posts
|
![]()
Thanks for the offer on the 55 block, but it is least desirable of the 265s.No oil filter that year. If it has a 4 bl intake I would be interested in that though.Casting number ends in 348.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,408
Likes: 501
Liked 328 Times in 176 Posts
|
![]()
1957 only ---265 block had thicker deck surfaces. Some say that if the engine serial number is still on the block then look for a letterC at the end that is "supposed" to signify a thicker deck surface
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: columbus, georgia
Posts: 382
Likes: 65
Liked 302 Times in 86 Posts
|
![]()
"C" is correct for '57 265, a 57 283 block would end with an "F".
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 227
Likes: 4
Liked 162 Times in 45 Posts
|
![]()
In 1959 there were some replacement 265 motors built for trucks. They were truly 283 blocks not bored all the way, reat thick walls and a neoprene rear seal. We found one. Good luck!
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#7 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sand Springs, OK
Posts: 8,132
Likes: 896
Liked 390 Times in 170 Posts
|
![]()
That is what I used in my old '56 Chevy. Had side mount bolt bosses. I got protested once over that. Some tech guys that did not know me & the car would feel for side mount bolt bosses. Then question me about it. At an out of div race, was protested. Told me "I know that is a 283" block! I had just learned about thick cylinder walls from Jere Stahl. That gentleman taught me a lot. Even located a guy locally Sonic Testing. Sure enough, the cylinder walls tested close to a tenth of an inch thicker than a '56 265" block I had in my garage. The deck was very thick as well.
__________________
Ed Wright 4156 SS/JA |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#8 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Pontiac,il.
Posts: 1,192
Likes: 272
Liked 950 Times in 189 Posts
|
![]()
I would love to have a picture of one of those blocks.I had a Corvette guy( He claims to have thousands of sbc blocks) in Detroit tell me that there was" never a 265 block made with side mounts".He wants thousands for some of the 265 blocks he has,and they are not even dated for an early Vette.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sand Springs, OK
Posts: 8,132
Likes: 896
Liked 390 Times in 170 Posts
|
![]()
That was about 50 years ago. I didn't take pictures of everything like many do now. Would have to screwed with having them developed too. LOL
__________________
Ed Wright 4156 SS/JA |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 569
Likes: 36
Liked 53 Times in 38 Posts
|
![]()
You sure got that rite, pictures where a luxury back then till the disposable camera and 1 hour developing huts came along. Anyone under 40 wouldn't understand LOL
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|