HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > .90 Heads Up Class Racing Tech
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-30-2018, 10:56 AM   #1
gnicholson
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 103
Likes: 15
Liked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Default Re: different ts ratio between 1/8and 1/4 mile

i will look over a stretch of good quarter runs and see what the eighth did like you suggested. my point was i have to take out enough numbers to reduce my et approx 4 tenths in the eighth that it changes the ratio but i really need more runs. i doubt we do the 8th index again but you never know. im just curious about this basically
gnicholson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2018, 03:52 PM   #2
Lenny5160
Senior Member
 
Lenny5160's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Inver Grove Heights, MN
Posts: 898
Likes: 604
Liked 431 Times in 224 Posts
Default Re: different ts ratio between 1/8and 1/4 mile

I see your point also, that if you change your stop duration by a bunch, the ratio could change along with it. Your stop duration was probably over 1 full second shorter than it would be to run 10.90.

I suppose there are a lot of guys who have run 10.90 and 9.90 with the same car who would know if the stop ratio is the same or different between classes.
__________________
S/ST 51
S/C 53
Lenny5160 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2018, 11:10 AM   #3
Dewdlebug
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: League City, TX
Posts: 124
Likes: 2
Liked 23 Times in 15 Posts
Default Re: different ts ratio between 1/8and 1/4 mile

I was able to do exactly what Tony mentioned and set up a new Db using the two 1/4 passes. Of course this required me to use the same stop rpm to make things work. But I ended up with about 50% less time in the stop doing it like this. Stop ratio was close to the same, maybe a pinch more.
One thing that I did not catch until Sunday was that I was coming off the stop before the 60' timer. Every adjustment I made to the timer affected the 60' time. Initially I thought track conditions were to blame, but it turned out that wasn't the case. 330' incremental numbers lined up. The right thing to do would have been to raise the stop rpm so I could carry a little more time and get past the 60' cone before coming off the stop. This way I could continue to use the 60' numbers to evaluate track conditions (which were suspect already). But when you're thrown a curve ball like we all were at that race you have to play the hand that you've been dealt.
I've promised myself that I'd work on a ideal 1/8 mi set up in case we get jacked around again like we did at TVRP.
Dewdlebug is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:47 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.