Leaf spring suspension

[DailyDriverSst]

Originally Posted by 340Cuda

I my son has Caltracs on his car, he feels there are no issues on driving it the street. He has taken it on five drag weeks with no issues. I think he could always run a 10.90 even in the heat.

In my opinion if you don't at least put frame connectors in it at sometime in the future you will have trouble closing the doors.

Good luck with your project.

Bill

Hi Bill,

Does he have the split mono's with his caltracs?

I'll be putting 1000-1500 miles on mine a year, plus local bracket and 7.0 racing, True Street no/lo-prep, and possibly some drag week or similar.

It's a truck platform, full frame rail. Body issues shouldn't exist...hopefully.

Not sureif this will show, it's what Dziorny posted when he got to Joliet this weekend.

[340Cuda]

Wow, never seen or heard of one doing that, can't say that anymore.

Yes my son does run the split mono. For years he ran the Calvert/Rancho shocks but he recently switched to the dual adjustable Vikings and likes them.

While we trailer his car there. the route he drives on Drag Week is always over 1,000 miles.

He also drives it to the track, occasionally to work on nice days and to car shows. Probably another 1,500 miles or so.

I forget some vehicles have real frames!

Bill

[DailyDriverSst]

Originally Posted by 340Cuda

Wow, never seen or heard of one doing that, can't say that anymore.

Yes my son does run the split mono. For years he ran the Calvert/Rancho shocks but he recently switched to the dual adjustable Vikings and likes them.

While we trailer his car there. the route he drives on Drag Week is always over 1,000 miles.

He also drives it to the track, occasionally to work on nice days and to car shows. Probably another 1,500 miles or so.

I forget some vehicles have real frames!

Bill

I had never heard of Viking until recently, been hearing alot of good things about them. Definitely DA on all 4 corners, see my notes above.

Good to know that your son's had good luck with the split mono's on the street. I do know you're supposed to loosen the bars until there's a small gap for street driving, then put a flat or 2 or 3 of preload in at the track.

[Mark Ugrich]

Have you considered fiberglass leafs? They can be custom made for arch and spring rate. I had a set on my car with ladder bars, which worked well. Might be worth discussing with your tech at Cal Tracs.

[Lenny5160]

I also noticed the ring welded to the frame for tying that car down, and I'd think that would put a lot of load onto the spring while towing and could have contributed to the breakage.

I run the Calvert split-monos and tie my car down around the rear end housing. I've never had a spring problem, but they did settle enough after about 15 years that I had to replace the rear halves to get some ride height back.

[340Cuda]

Originally Posted by DailyDriverSst

I I do know you're supposed to loosen the bars until there's a small gap for street driving, then put a flat or 2 or 3 of preload in at the track.

I don't know where his are adjusted but he does not change them street to track.

Bill

[NHRA1926]

Daily Driver Sst. I run a 3700 lb 67 Camaro with a 496 pump gas John Lingenfelter engine. It runs 10.50's @ 127 mph. It's still a street driven car with full interior and working lights and such. It has Caltrac bars, Afco shocks, (which are a must with the bars). I installed Caltrac split mono leaf springs and did see a big difference. But, the biggest gain in 60 ft. times was when I installed a set of Mickey Thompson Pro Drag Radials. 60 ft times went from high 1.40s - low 1.50s, all the way down to mid to high 1.30s. The Calvert springs and bars put a HUGE down force on the tires this is why the Afco shocks are so important. I used to run Competition Engineering shocks, but there is no way they can overcome the body separation of the down force caused by the Caltrac bars. Coming of the trans-brake @ 3,000 RPM, the car used to flatten the tire to the point that it was wearing off the side wall writing of the tires, then obviously it would spin, then hook hard again, folding the tire, spin, then hook and take off. the only way I found this out, was by video taping the launch, and playing it back frame by frame in slow motion. The tires completely stopped all that from happening. Best thing I've ever done to the car. Now the cars carries the front wheels about 2 feet high till just passed the tree. I am very satisfied with John Calverts products. I did notice in the picture that you tie the car down using the frame. In theory, this is the correct way the not wear out the suspension during transport. But, keep in mind that you have a very heavy 4500 lb car. you may want to try tying it down at the rear axle instead, and stiffen the shocks during transport mode. It may be putting too much pressure on the springs during transport tying it down from the frame. Just my 2 cents. Hope this helps.
Lugnut

[DailyDriverSst]

Originally Posted by NHRA1926

Daily Driver Sst. I run a 3700 lb 67 Camaro with a 496 pump gas John Lingenfelter engine. It runs 10.50's @ 127 mph. It's still a street driven car with full interior and working lights and such. It has Caltrac bars, Afco shocks, (which are a must with the bars). I installed Caltrac split mono leaf springs and did see a big difference. But, the biggest gain in 60 ft. times was when I installed a set of Mickey Thompson Pro Drag Radials. 60 ft times went from high 1.40s - low 1.50s, all the way down to mid to high 1.30s. The Calvert springs and bars put a HUGE down force on the tires this is why the Afco shocks are so important. I used to run Competition Engineering shocks, but there is no way they can overcome the body separation of the down force caused by the Caltrac bars. Coming of the trans-brake @ 3,000 RPM, the car used to flatten the tire to the point that it was wearing off the side wall writing of the tires, then obviously it would spin, then hook hard again, folding the tire, spin, then hook and take off. the only way I found this out, was by video taping the launch, and playing it back frame by frame in slow motion. The tires completely stopped all that from happening. Best thing I've ever done to the car. Now the cars carries the front wheels about 2 feet high till just passed the tree. I am very satisfied with John Calverts products. I did notice in the picture that you tie the car down using the frame. In theory, this is the correct way the not wear out the suspension during transport. But, keep in mind that you have a very heavy 4500 lb car. you may want to try tying it down at the rear axle instead, and stiffen the shocks during transport mode. It may be putting too much pressure on the springs during transport tying it down from the frame. Just my 2 cents. Hope this helps.
Lugnut

Hi Lugnut,

Thanks for the info! That's not my photo, that's from Steve Dziony (same platform I have). Definitely going with double adjustables on each end, the front are stock mount so my only limitation is dimensionally correct shocks for the front. I'm adding a crossmember for the ARB and rear shocks, so I'll have regular mounts and a decent set of options for the back.

So you are finding that in your application, there is enough vertical separation available in the spring to give full droop to fully plant the tires? This was my main concern when talking to the tech at Calvert - they have a split mono profile for my application, but since they use spring arch to set ride height independent of spring rate, this is where my knowledge runs out. I'm use to using spring rate as a component of ride height in coil applications, and thought that it would at least factor in for my application given the obesity of the truck.

The problem I'm running into is that most of the setups on the platform I'm using are N/A, regular cab, and completely stripped out of all HVAC and anything else not required by stock/Sstk interior rules. I'm working with a power adder, extended cab, and fully functional interior. I'm 5-600 pounds heavier than most, and about 400 pounds over the next closest combination I can leach notes form.

This is exactly what I needed to know - I was planning to run the MT 3062S (29.5 x true 10.5 x 15) but given my weight, I wasn't sure even a stiff wall and 12 PSI would be enough to hold up. I've read some people have issues with the PBR tires on lackluster prep tracks, but every situation is different.

[rboyle]

Originally Posted by DailyDriverSst

Hi Bill,

Does he have the split mono's with his caltracs?

I'll be putting 1000-1500 miles on mine a year, plus local bracket and 7.0 racing, True Street no/lo-prep, and possibly some drag week or similar.

It's a truck platform, full frame rail. Body issues shouldn't exist...hopefully.

Not sureif this will show, it's what Dziorny posted when he got to Joliet this weekend.

Just a thought on the pic. I tie down to the lower shock mount via an eyelet so it doesn’t load the springs although it still has spring bounce the body is not stressing the spring and acting as a limiter on the srtaps