|
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 177
Likes: 21
Liked 299 Times in 48 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Loosening the extension on the rear shocks will help hit the tire harder into the track surface, and if your front shocks are loose enough and you've got enough weight in the back - you should be able to get it rolling. On a good track, keeping weight low and to the middle or forward on the car will always be the fastest. But on bad tracks - you've gotta do what you've gotta do... |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Ga.
Posts: 521
Likes: 7
Liked 13 Times in 11 Posts
|
![]()
Thanks Mike.
I've experienced all those scenerios too........ Before I lower the ride height back down I'll try just stiffening the rear shocks to find the fine line between too much separation and rattling the tires. Whats complicated this is that I changed to new springs last year ( more rate ) as the old orginals had been in there since early nineties and were just junkyard springs when I installed back then. The new springs just naturally changed the ride height so to get the car back down I had to use the lowest holes on the floaters which in turn lowered the I.C. and so on............so I raised the car UP 1 hole and now the front of the bar is higher ( higher I.C. ). Just to see how the car would react. The problem arises where / when I want to limit the seperation with stiffer extension , potentially inducing the "basketballing " effect. Seperation is typically not an issue with the low I.C. and it seems to me the best tuning "window" will be with the lower ride height / lower I.C. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Hays, KS
Posts: 380
Likes: 226
Liked 70 Times in 31 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Darrel Goheen 785-623-7021 Stock Eliminator 585 94 Camaro Z/28 LT1/ET 585 67 Chevelle 427 Tehnician for JustAnswer.com |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|