|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Columbus, IN
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Have you tried any header tuning while on the dyno? These engines really benefit from the exhaust scavenging. That is why the original Stage 2 heads were so effective.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Long Island, New york
Posts: 592
Likes: 131
Liked 46 Times in 29 Posts
|
![]()
Congrats on your hard work paying off. Nice power. Small valve low compression engine. I look forward to hearing about testing now.
Chris |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Colorado Springs Colorado/Thousand Oaks Ca
Posts: 656
Likes: 82
Liked 372 Times in 129 Posts
|
![]()
Thanks, I have tested Aug 19. In F/SA trim I ran 11.40 with zero tuning at Pueblo Colorado 4800 feet elevation, 25.10 baro, 7240 DA, .9508 correction, running the Turbo 400 with 4.10 gears. My next change is testing different carbs, a metric trans and 4.30 gears along with a rear end redesign. I really wish I had the time to really get after this combination I think it could really run.
Last edited by HP HUNTER; 08-21-2017 at 11:19 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,815
Likes: 2,903
Liked 5,121 Times in 1,952 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Call me..Can't find your number ..Have an unrelated question for you. 602-769-0346
__________________
"We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for." Will Rogers |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Colorado Springs Colorado/Thousand Oaks Ca
Posts: 656
Likes: 82
Liked 372 Times in 129 Posts
|
![]()
I don't know the index in F for Pueblo, although the NHRA correction is .9508. 11.4 X .9508 = 10.84 not earth shattering.....but I'am just getting started. Stay tuned.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Arkansas - In the middle of everything.
Posts: 2,001
Likes: 64
Liked 779 Times in 193 Posts
|
![]()
11.40 / .9508 = 11.99
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Aberdeen SD
Posts: 645
Likes: 30
Liked 112 Times in 31 Posts
|
![]()
Dwight,
Hunter was taking his run back to sea level with the .9508 factor. That's what that factor does. You divided instead of multiplying. As an example, the factored Index for Pueblo, 12.46 x .9508 gives you the sea level Index of 11.85. Lots of people who aren't "altitude runners" get these factors all confused. Jerry |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Colorado Springs Colorado/Thousand Oaks Ca
Posts: 656
Likes: 82
Liked 372 Times in 129 Posts
|
![]()
I tried different lengths of extensions, the best were in the pictures. Merge collectors were not tested.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|