|
![]() |
#361 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Arizona, Texan forever
Posts: 1,176
Likes: 879
Liked 574 Times in 212 Posts
|
![]()
It is killing me too. If Steve Wann has something to do with it, you know it is wicked fast. Ie: A/SA record. The Duster used to be Stevè's car.
__________________
Gary Hansen - SS/FA 4911, B/SA 4911 Last edited by SStockDart; 08-05-2017 at 03:26 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#362 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 162
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Of course, with you running in the same class as the 340 combo, I understand your concern over any perceived advantage it, or any other E/SA combo may have over yours. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#363 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Coarsegold, CA
Posts: 1,016
Likes: 57
Liked 320 Times in 102 Posts
|
![]()
I thought that with the new and improved NHRA Tech Management that the "revision" to allow the use of a non-assembly line, after market, Direct Connection performance aluminum manifold would include a 10 HP reduction in rating due to having to add additional ballast?????????????
I don't get it, but maybe that's OK, too.............. Very soon with aftermarket aluminum performance intake manifolds, roller rocker arms, solid hydraulic lifters (flat & roller), aftermarket disk brakes, aluminum radiators & seats, unlimited spring design and pressure and now all that the NHRA needs to do is to eliminate the stock valve lift spec and we are what's known as Super Stock..... Very nice work NHRA it looks like you will be able to get more time to run the Pros, plus it leaves time for the spectators to view exhibitions like the Big Tire / Small Tire fiasco and jet dragsters... Another job well done by NHRA Tech Management.....
__________________
Bob Mulry 7516 STK A & M Motorsports |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#364 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 101
Likes: 89
Liked 62 Times in 17 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#365 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: usa
Posts: 239
Likes: 7
Liked 21 Times in 8 Posts
|
![]()
if you bolted a stock cast iron intake on that duster it would run exactly the same as the ld 340 . we tried all of that crap 20 plus years ago you would be surprised how little change intake have , they don't turn enough rpm to make a difference. maybe just maybe they spent the time to make the carburetor and fuel system converter gearing shift points etc..... work properly , only benefit I see is 20# in the trunk.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#366 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 271
Likes: 54
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Amen to that!
__________________
Larry Fulton |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#367 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Louisville , KY
Posts: 1,995
Likes: 69
Liked 279 Times in 68 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Greg Hill 4171 STK |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#368 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Out to Lunch
Posts: 191
Likes: 2
Liked 26 Times in 11 Posts
|
![]()
I've followed this thread for a little while, and I am not that smart, so help me out here.
Someone lobbied NHRA to allow an aftermarket intake manifold in stock eliminator. Correct? Yet this manifold has ZERO performance benefit? See you at the races, Wayne Kerr |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#369 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Cucamonga, CA
Posts: 1,522
Likes: 157
Liked 229 Times in 99 Posts
|
![]()
I ran out of popcorn 15 pages ago.
__________________
Floyd Staggs 787 SST |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#370 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Arkansas - In the middle of everything.
Posts: 2,001
Likes: 64
Liked 780 Times in 194 Posts
|
![]()
Doesn't matter if it is a performance gain or not, it should not have been allowed.
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|