|
![]() |
#221 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Houma, LA
Posts: 2,717
Likes: 2
Liked 325 Times in 50 Posts
|
![]()
OK, lets start over. That manifold is in the book from not too long ago. It was put in by NHRA, but in checking the validity of this aforementioned manifold NHRA asked Mopar about a Technical Service Bulletin issued in 73 or 74. That bulletin would explain why it was used. NHRA asked Mopar about the manifold. and Mopar asked me as they know I have the parts books back to l960. I looked up that number and it is not there. However casting numbers are in the NHRA book and not part numbers, but from every other manifold (and other parts) in that era, the part number was usually one off (the last digit) from each other. I do not have the old TCB's, but am looking for some people who are just as old as me (maybe not as fat and stupid) that might have a collection of these Bulletins. NHRA has the number of the Bulletin, but I can't find one. Since this started Billy cited Galan Govier, a reknown Chrylser authority on what got produced by Chrysler as they allowed him to look at the old records. According to Billy that number was around, but the part number was preceeded by a "P" which indicates a Chrysler Performance part which would indicate an aftermarket part with no warranty for one thing and usually sold thru dealers and sold by Mopar Performance. A company could be a Mopar Performance dealer or any franchised dealer (which I have been since 1968). If that is the case then it is aftermarket and I have sent this to NHRA in the form of an email. And they agreed to give me a few days to see if anyone has this Bulletin. Blocks, heads, manifolds from what I remember. Now most of the time a "P' number is embossed on the part, but not all the time. I think any race block I have had did have the "P' number embossed on the block. Now if this manifold was produced as a performance item, maybe the "P" was included on the number on the thing. Someone posted a picture of the supposed manifold, but I could not enlarge it enough to see if it, the "P' was there. Maybe someone could look that picture and can see better than me. That would solve the mystery. However from 1968 on emission regulations were an issue and many times a part change was done to correct something especially in the fuel system. We have seen this many times in the years since emission controls. Probably not in this case but it has happened. So obviously I don't get it, but an explanation might be here just as the explanation was offered for the 42 year old Camaro 350. We never raced a 340 except and T/A, and it is still here in Houma with an Edlebrock manifold with the original owner. If we had raced the 4 bbl version, I would probably know. One interesting thing in this whole discussion is obviously folks have a dislike for the 340 as racers have gotten the thing to run really fast. This manifold was never in-the-book legal until 2017. Now if it has been allowed by NHRA for some time and people have been running it then it got by, then maybe we start over. (old saying 'Its not what is legal, it is what passed') And if no one has been running it, then opponents will have no relief.
__________________
Jeff Teuton 4022 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#222 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,498
Likes: 3,600
Liked 7,779 Times in 1,742 Posts
|
![]()
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS I'm not spending 100K to win 2K |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#223 | ||
VIP Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 4,060
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times in 9 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Quote:
We have an LD340 manifold in the attic. That doesn't make it legal for Stock.
__________________
Michael Beard - NHRA/IHRA 3216 S/SS |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#224 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 572
Likes: 39
Liked 53 Times in 38 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Last edited by Coleydog; 07-29-2017 at 11:15 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#225 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Houma, LA
Posts: 2,717
Likes: 2
Liked 325 Times in 50 Posts
|
![]()
OK. I will look again at my books and see if I can find that part number in some year. I am also looking for some old Mopar Performance catalogs that might reference it. Or I might just go drink a beer and let everyone go home.
__________________
Jeff Teuton 4022 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#226 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,498
Likes: 3,600
Liked 7,779 Times in 1,742 Posts
|
![]()
Jeff, go to post #121 on this thread. Click on the tag. It will bring you to a 1973 parts manual (Jan.73). Go to page 2-12 of the manual. Look at Chrysler part #P3549884. You're welcome.
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS I'm not spending 100K to win 2K Last edited by Billy Nees; 02-11-2017 at 08:08 PM. Reason: wrong page number |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#227 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Boulder City, Nevada 89005
Posts: 2,733
Likes: 2,803
Liked 2,486 Times in 697 Posts
|
![]()
I will not run the aluminum manifold on
any of our cars even if legal. Our Iron stuff is faster on our cars in testing. I will be just as pleased if it is outlawed...... as far as we are concerned
__________________
John Irving 741 Stock 741 Super Stock |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#228 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Coarsegold, CA
Posts: 1,016
Likes: 57
Liked 320 Times in 102 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Since I have no idea who you are I have a couple of questions that might help me understand your position...... Have you ever lost a heads up race?? Does the outcome of a race matter to you?? If you have lost a heads up race what actions did you take to prevent it from happening again. That is if you do care about it happening again?? Did you find a class or eliminator to run that had no heads up racing?? Are you having fun drag racing, if you drag race?? I am just attempting to find the reason that you participate in this type of drag racing and if in fact you do participate?? Thank you, Bob Mulry
__________________
Bob Mulry 7516 STK A & M Motorsports |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#229 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Richmond Indiana
Posts: 1,196
Likes: 5
Liked 32 Times in 19 Posts
|
![]()
Reality strikes Stock and SS parts supply and methods of correcting.
Allowing one aftermarket head, carb, manifold begins to get in the direction of a Spec motor doesn't it? Just killing the classes one piece at a time instead of allowing everyone to make the changes all at once and be more level field. Just my humble opinion.I know I don't own one today. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#230 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Verrry South Jersey
Posts: 537
Likes: 134
Liked 251 Times in 125 Posts
|
![]()
I wonder why Mopar sold the LD340? The consensus on here seems to be that the iron is faster.
I'm enjoying the discussion immensely. Stock has evolved so much over the years, I wonder if anyone at NHRA even understands how it started out, and how it has evolved? Last edited by Dave Gantz; 02-12-2017 at 11:38 AM. Reason: clarification |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|