|
|
![]() |
#1 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,108
Likes: 58
Liked 510 Times in 117 Posts
|
![]()
What kind of clutch are you using? I used to run the QT 6022W with a stock fork, stock non adjustable fork pivot ball with a 16010 McLeod bearing and dual disc 7in clutch. Never had an issue with a fork hitting the pressure plate.
__________________
68 Chevy11 327 F/S |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 63
Likes: 31
Liked 52 Times in 22 Posts
|
![]()
Thanks for the replies. The clutch is a McLeod Soft Lok with a .380" thick disc. If I shorten the pivot ball so the fork doesn't hit the pressure plate, the fork will then hit the bellhousing when the clutch pedal is depressed preventing the clutch from disengaging.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,108
Likes: 58
Liked 510 Times in 117 Posts
|
![]()
I use the GM fork 3892632 not the Corvette style. Not sure if that makes a difference or not.
__________________
68 Chevy11 327 F/S |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Cumming GA
Posts: 1,995
Likes: 1,300
Liked 1,440 Times in 301 Posts
|
![]()
The throwoutbearing has spacers that you may have to take out To make it short enough. With a .380 disc it is pretty tight in there. Is it also shimmed between the flywheel and pp? You might have to put the QT spacer between the bell and block saver. I think the part number is rm-198. It is .250 thick. You would have to run a long pivot ball and check your crossmember and driveshaft fitment, but it opens up a lot more room for you.
__________________
James Schaechter 3163 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: the Brazos Valley of TX
Posts: 114
Likes: 161
Liked 125 Times in 33 Posts
|
![]()
Like Ed, I went with the Browell fork and heim pivot. Best thing since sliced bread. Browell also has a variety of throwout bearing collar lengths available that might help.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: from Vancouver BC Canada, now in Nova Scotia
Posts: 1,312
Likes: 323
Liked 1,113 Times in 304 Posts
|
![]()
I didn`t know that GM racers were also having issues with QT bellhousings too. For whatever reason, it seems that Quick Time assumed that everybody that needs a scattershield is using a diaphragm style pressure plate. When they first came out, I wanted to buy a QT for my 428 FE Ford, but between them saying that their bellhousings "met all SFI test standards", yet were not provided with a SFI sticker, and that to use a QT in a Ford application and a Long style pressure plate, like a McLeod Soft Lok, or how every Ford FE powered vehicle to roll off the assembly line came equipped, required stacking 2 or 3 block plates to get adequate room,well screw that BS. I have also heard that in several applications, QT also elected to change the location and angle that the clutch fork is oriented . Too bad, had QT made a product that actually worked in a real race enviroment, they likely would have sold a lot more units. Its weight savings and compact design would have been a real plus, But to get an actual SFI stickered housing costs more, is heavier, negates much of the benefit. Sad thing that since Lakewood bought out Quick Time, that many of the old Lakewood housings have been discontinued, and now many less popular engines have no reasonably priced SFI bellhousings available any more.
__________________
NHRA 6390 STK M/S 85 Mustang |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Woodburn, Or
Posts: 688
Likes: 84
Liked 806 Times in 246 Posts
|
![]()
I do like the lower weight, more compact size and better dimensional qualities of the Quicktime. What I didn't like was the fact that they about doubled in price after they got bought out.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|