|
|
![]() |
#1 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Arkansas - In the middle of everything.
Posts: 1,999
Likes: 64
Liked 772 Times in 192 Posts
|
![]()
eg 1967:
Was the "325hp" Firebird RA1 up-rated to the "360hp" Tempest RA1 rating? (which I assume was left as-is at 360)? Were both the stick and auto cam engines left with the same rating? Yes. 1968: So, was the "335hp" Firebird RA1 up-rated to the "360hp" Tempest RA1 rating (which I assume was left as-is at 360)? Were both the stick and auto cam engines left with the same rating? Yes and yes. 1968-70 Was the base "330hp" Firebird up-rated to the base "350hp" Tempest rating? No. 1968 Firebird was left at 330. 1969 and 1970 Firebirds were 350. 1969: Was the "335hp" Firebird RA3 up-rated to the "366hp" Tempest RA3 rating? Yes. 1970: Was the "345hp" Firebird RA3 up-rated to the "366hp" Tempest RA3 rating? 345hp Firebird and the 366hp Tempest were both at 366. The 370hp RA IV engines in 1969 and 1970 were at 380.
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 274
Likes: 98
Liked 48 Times in 44 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Thanks Dwight that is a great help in lining things up. At least with Pontiac you don't have to worry so much about a Ram Air factor, its either a Ram Air car or its not. I'm not sure how (or if) NHRA handled cold air in general back then - we covered where NHRA factored the flat-hood 428CJ at 340hp, but factored the cold-air 428CJ at 360hp. But I cant find any other examples were NHRA factored a cold-air car different than a flat-hood or "warm-air" car, does that sound right? Well now I am thinking about those doggone Street Hemi's again. Were they ALL factored to 480hp or just the ones with cold air, which would be all the 69-70 Hemis, some of the 71 Hemis, and a few of the 67 Hemis, the RO23 glass hood cars? Could the rest of the warm-air Hemis been factored at say 465hp or were they all 480hp? Last edited by DeuceCoupe; 12-31-2016 at 03:57 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|