|
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Colorado Springs Colorado/Thousand Oaks Ca
Posts: 656
Likes: 82
Liked 373 Times in 129 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
It is the same combination as last year, just dialed in now, low 10s. The cam was used to keep the engine as close to what I sell as possible, the cam has great vacuum and works great in a street driver. There is better cam choices when it comes to the track for sure. I feel I've maxed the combo out and its time to move on to my 620 HP oval port combo, I think you will like that cam, 108 LC, peaks @ 6600 RPM, the peanut port peaked @ 5900, although it ran through @ 6900 RPM. Stay tuned.... Last edited by HP HUNTER; 08-05-2016 at 08:34 AM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 6 Posts
|
![]()
It ran 10.80s at 7000 da is this corrected or what would you expect at 2000 da
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Colorado Springs Colorado/Thousand Oaks Ca
Posts: 656
Likes: 82
Liked 373 Times in 129 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Example: 2000 DA with a baro of 28.00 2000 DA with a baro of 29.40 Obviously the 2000 DA with the 29.40 baro WILL be faster than a 2000 DA with a 28.00 baro in my opinion. So to answer your question, I would say 10.40s in a 2000 DA. Last edited by HP HUNTER; 08-09-2016 at 09:46 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|