HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-25-2016, 11:54 PM   #51
DeuceCoupe
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 274
Likes: 98
Liked 48 Times in 44 Posts
Default Re: Lookin for NHRA Stock Class ET/MPH from 1970-71

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dick Butler View Post
Guys, I am trying to send photos of my conversion of John Dianna's Delivery to my 150 2dr. wagon I ran against Barkley for class at the 1970 us nationals. I used a pg with the same 2 x 4 motor John used. I did not change rear end or anything as I was a first time racer. I admit I drove off idle and never tried to stall it or changed converters.
I did buy bigger adjustable stahl headers and picked up a couple. George Supinski and then others ran it at 13.60s in florida at the Gators.... Try for his details from 1970 or 71. Val Hedworth was fast with a wagon also.

Thanks Dick, the hydramatic vs powerglide cars are quite a story.
I found this pic of Dianna's Delivery vs Garey in 1968 in case you had missed it:
http://www.doverdragstrip.com/phpBB3...=2027&start=10


Good thread too.
DeuceCoupe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2016, 01:38 AM   #52
bill dedman
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Conway, AR
Posts: 1,739
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 4 Posts
Default Re: Lookin for NHRA Stock Class ET/MPH from 1970-71

Deuce coupe...

Here is a copy of a post I wrote back in 2007 that may help you with your article., The thread it comes from (one from December, 2007) has lots of posts from knowledgable people whose posts you might want to investigate.

This is my contribution to that thread:

"NHRA allowed the 4-speed HydraMatic in Chevy sedan deliveries and El Caminos from about 1964 until they pulled the plug on all the "Dual-Range" 4-speed HydraMatics somewhere arounf 1972 or '73....not sure of the exact dates.

Nomads were just fancy station wagons and had to run Powerglides, like a sedan.

How they ever got approved is not exactly known; I heard that some guy from California, who was a close friend of a Division Tech Director (perhaps, Div. VII), had a 348-powered Stocker that was an El Camino, and was licensed as a truck in California. He supposedly convinced this Division Tech guy that since it was licensed as a truck, it should be allowed to use a truck transmission. Chevy trucks at that time,didn't use Powerglides... they had 4-speed HydraMatics. I don't know how much of that story, if any, is true, so, please don't quote me. It was a l-o-n-g time ago...

This was during a period of time when torque converter science was in its infancy. It was very difficult, if not impossible, to get a decent hi-stall converter for a Powerglide transmission.

The NHRA rules at the time, allowed virtually any engine in the Blueprint Specs to run in virtually any body, so it was legal and feasible to run a 283 c.i.d., F.I. 283 horsepower motor in a '57 Chevy sedan delivery, for example, with a 4-speed HydraMatic tranny. These transmissions had a fluid coupling instead of a torque converter, and were very easy to modify for high stall speeds.

The news of this transmission, its superior performance, and its across-the-board legality in Chevy "trucks" (sedan deliveries and El Caminos, included), spread like wildfire, and soon, they were populating every class from about E/SA down to N/SA, whicjh was the bottom "automatic." class for V8's at the time (16 pounds per hp???)

At one point, they held virtually every record from E to N... with "host" vehicles ranging from '55 Chevy sedan deliveries with 4-bbl "Power Pack" 265s in N/SA (high 14's) up to '57 Chevy F-I- 283/283hp sedan deliveries, running mid- 13's in E/SA.

I remember a letter-to-the-editor of National DRAGSTER from the wife of the driver/builder of "BIG DADDY": (not Garlits), a '60 Buick convertible G/SA Stocker from Lafayette, Indiana (Russ Matthews) who announced that her elderly husband was giving up trying to compete with these "fantasy cars" that were never built by the factory. He'd been a national record holder for years with his 401/nailhead/Dynaflow Buick, but the sedan deliveries made his car uncompetitive. So, he was quitting. She just wanted everyone to know why.

I think that letter MAY have precipitated some action...

It wasn't too long after that, that NHRA bit the bullet and disallowed that "truck" transmission in sedan deliveries and El Caminos.

The reason they were disallowed is that NHRA finally (albeit, tacitly) admitted that the Chevy factory never put that transmission in passenger-car based vehicles. It was in pickups, panel trucks, and larger Chevy trucks, but NEVER in sedan deliveries (or, El Caminos.)

I built one of the first ones to hit the strip in 1965, and I remember pouring over Chevy parts books, trying to find motor (rear) mounts that would fit the engine/tranny and the sedan crossmember.

No go; they had mounts for Powerglides in sedans, and mounts for Hydros in Pickup trucks, but NOTHING for a Hydro-to-sedan cross-memeber (which is what the sedan delivery had... because it was, in essence, just a station wagon with 2 doors.)

So, like everyone else, I had to build my own... LOL!

With the advent of Marvin Ripes' (and, others') new hi-stall Powerglide converters, it soon became a moot point, anyway.

This whole deal was a major embarrassment for NHRA, and one that I'm not sure they'll ever live down. It's been 35 years since they pulled the plug on the hydros in the sedan deliveries, and people still talk about it...

You'd think they would have learned something about the bogus legalization of "never-never" combos..."

I hijacked the thread... it was originally about the NHRA legalizing 4-speed manual transmissions in '55 (and, later) Chevies.

This is a link to that earlier thread: http://classracer.com/classforum/showthread.php?t=8410

Hope this helps!
__________________
Bill

Last edited by bill dedman; 06-26-2016 at 01:56 AM.
bill dedman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2016, 07:42 AM   #53
Rich Biebel
VIP Member
 
Rich Biebel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Northern New Jersey suburbs
Posts: 2,314
Likes: 25
Liked 544 Times in 213 Posts
Default Re: Lookin for NHRA Stock Class ET/MPH from 1970-71

NHRA knocked out all combinations that were never built or offered as regular production line combinations.....this included hydro equipped SD's. I think it was after the 1968 season.

'57 Chevy's could not use 4 speed transmissions anymore since they were only offered in Corvettes. 3 speed manual or P/G

'62 Plymouth same deal.....383/343 could not run a 4 speed....3 speed manual or auto...

Lot's of other combinations were disallowed.......
__________________
Rich Biebel
S/C 1479
Stock 147R
Rich Biebel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2016, 04:41 PM   #54
Freddie Cain
Junior Member
 
Freddie Cain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 33
Likes: 1
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default Re: Lookin for NHRA Stock Class ET/MPH from 1970-71

Deuce Coupe,Please check your private messages.
Freddie Cain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2016, 05:23 PM   #55
Ed Wright
Veteran Member
 
Ed Wright's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sand Springs, OK
Posts: 8,132
Likes: 896
Liked 390 Times in 170 Posts
Default Re: Lookin for NHRA Stock Class ET/MPH from 1970-71

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich Biebel View Post
NHRA knocked out all combinations that were never built or offered as regular production line combinations.....this included hydro equipped SD's. I think it was after the 1968 season.

'57 Chevy's could not use 4 speed transmissions anymore since they were only offered in Corvettes. 3 speed manual or P/G

'62 Plymouth same deal.....383/343 could not run a 4 speed....3 speed manual or auto...

Lot's of other combinations were disallowed.......
I thought all that was way over due. I could not understand those being legal to begin with.
__________________
Ed Wright 4156 SS/JA
Ed Wright is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2016, 09:54 PM   #56
DeuceCoupe
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 274
Likes: 98
Liked 48 Times in 44 Posts
Default Re: Lookin for NHRA Stock Class ET/MPH from 1970-71

Quote:
Originally Posted by bill dedman View Post
Deuce coupe...

Here is a copy of a post I wrote back in 2007 that may help you with your article., The thread it comes from (one from December, 2007) has lots of posts from knowledgable people whose posts you might want to investigate.

This is my contribution to that thread:

"NHRA allowed the 4-speed HydraMatic in Chevy sedan deliveries and El Caminos from about 1964 until they pulled the plug on all the "Dual-Range" 4-speed HydraMatics somewhere arounf 1972 or '73....not sure of the exact dates.........

This is a link to that earlier thread: http://classracer.com/classforum/showthread.php?t=8410

Hope this helps!




Bill,
Thanks for that old Dec.2007 link:
Great history on transmissions & NHRA.
I gather from your comments:
1. Nobody drag raced a TurboGlide (or very few & not for long), fairly easy to see.
2. On the Roto / SlimJim - why was it so slow, isn't it just a simpler Super/Jetaway 2-coupling Hydramatic?
3. I had assumed folks like Lloyd & Carol Cox (61-62 Ventura/Cat) would have run the Roto, cant find that info, do you know? Or did they run the bigger-car Super Hydramatic?


Good pics of Lloyd & Carol & Cars:
http://www.dragracingonline.com/feat..._11-cox-1.html
DeuceCoupe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2016, 02:12 AM   #57
bill dedman
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Conway, AR
Posts: 1,739
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 4 Posts
Default Re: Lookin for NHRA Stock Class ET/MPH from 1970-71

1. The problem with a Turboglide was, it held the engine at about 3,500 rpm until it was going about 75 mph... Only then, after it was in 3rd gear (1:1) would the rpms start increasing. A small block Chevy doesn't make much power at 3,500 rpm... so, no, not many people ran them...

2. The Slim Jim was a 3-speed automatic that suffered from having one too few gears; it acted like a 4-speed automatic that was missing second gear... the large rpm drop from 1st to second was excerbated by the fact that second was a direct (mechanical) application of engine torque (had no power going through the fluid coupling) so there was no "slip" at all,and this droppped the rpm even further.. not a good thing.

2. I don't know which transmission the Cox cars ran, but if I had to guess, I would imagine that they all ran the two-fluid-coupling, 4-speed transmission; the Slim-Jim was too fragile and slow to be effective.

Oldsmobile called that big-car transmission "Jetaway HydraMatic", while Pontiac called it "Strato-Flight HydraMatic"..... same transmission. I have never seen either referred to as a "Super HydraMatic."
Sorry I don't know more about the Cox cars... but, I seem to remember that the Cox race cars were always high-performance versions, and as such, would not have come with the Slim Jim boxes.
__________________
Bill

Last edited by bill dedman; 06-27-2016 at 02:16 AM.
bill dedman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2016, 07:49 AM   #58
jimmyparker
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: columbus, georgia
Posts: 385
Likes: 65
Liked 309 Times in 88 Posts
Default Re: Lookin for NHRA Stock Class ET/MPH from 1970-71

Reference the 70/71 Records, I have one little tidbit that reminds us what communication was like in the "old days". I set the O/S record at the Gainesville Div II race in '71 at around 13.45, tore down and was really happy to get the record. What I didn't know was that Bruce Wilkinson set it the same weekend in Bowling Green at 13.41 or so. I got my certificate but it never hit ND which was a big deal back then. I had a 220hp '66 Belair Two door sedan and Bruce was running his '56 wagon at that time.


Jimmy Parker
jimmyparker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2016, 09:23 AM   #59
Rich Biebel
VIP Member
 
Rich Biebel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Northern New Jersey suburbs
Posts: 2,314
Likes: 25
Liked 544 Times in 213 Posts
Default Re: Lookin for NHRA Stock Class ET/MPH from 1970-71

The automatic transmissions and converter or fluid coupling issues were a very big deal back then and why manuals were preferred. "Slush Box" was a popular term...I had a '58 Pontiac with an automatic trans and raced it a little. It was my Street car and I also used it as a tow car. Trans went and I had it rebuilt by a racing buddie. Shifted to hard after the rebuild. Those transmissions failed often if raced.
__________________
Rich Biebel
S/C 1479
Stock 147R
Rich Biebel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2016, 01:26 PM   #60
Ed Wright
Veteran Member
 
Ed Wright's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sand Springs, OK
Posts: 8,132
Likes: 896
Liked 390 Times in 170 Posts
Default Re: Lookin for NHRA Stock Class ET/MPH from 1970-71

Quote:
Originally Posted by jimmyparker View Post
Reference the 70/71 Records, I have one little tidbit that reminds us what communication was like in the "old days". I set the O/S record at the Gainesville Div II race in '71 at around 13.45, tore down and was really happy to get the record. What I didn't know was that Bruce Wilkinson set it the same weekend in Bowling Green at 13.41 or so. I got my certificate but it never hit ND which was a big deal back then. I had a 220hp '66 Belair Two door sedan and Bruce was running his '56 wagon at that time.


Jimmy Parker
I had the same thing once. Set both ends of the N/S record with my '56, tore down for Red Anderson (I was just a kid, and scared to death of him.), the Ronca Bros set both ends
the same weekend in div 1. I got the points, nothing else. I set the ET record two more times. I never could run the MPH those guys ran.
__________________
Ed Wright 4156 SS/JA
Ed Wright is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:29 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.