|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 194
Likes: 20
Liked 341 Times in 77 Posts
|
![]()
The whole system is crap IMHO. I just spent a small fortune to build a car that could be competitive only to spend another year learning how to play a stupid game of sandbagging just to avoid this kind of peer scrutiny!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: lyndon ky. ... louisville area
Posts: 1,327
Likes: 30
Liked 506 Times in 122 Posts
|
![]()
Automatic Help For Slugs ... been 10 years still the same
it cannot and will not ever work as long as WE can manipulate the system. just a crutch for NHRA to blame thier inability to correctly factor cars on instead of thier incompetent employees. captain... sure that will come back to haunt me in teardown : ) merry christmas hope you got a tenth under the tree
__________________
Jack McCarthy 3609 STK "the Captain" |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Whittier, Ca
Posts: 830
Likes: 97
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
![]()
The horsepower for the 64-65 chevelle should be 65 only as the two engines are different. The 64 has a small intake valve 520, and the 65 has a large intake 462. This an example of heads as there are other numbers available for both combinations. Not the first time that this mistake has been made.
__________________
Tony Janes 7941 STK, SS Last edited by Tony Janes; 12-24-2015 at 08:54 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Aberdeen SD
Posts: 645
Likes: 30
Liked 112 Times in 31 Posts
|
![]()
Tony,
I'm sure you meant the '64 had small valve 520 heads. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 232
Likes: 7
Liked 13 Times in 2 Posts
|
![]()
NHRA did not respond to all requests as is normal
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Whittier, Ca
Posts: 830
Likes: 97
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
![]()
Doug were the request done in the right manner? Explain what you mean.
__________________
Tony Janes 7941 STK, SS |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 4 Posts
|
![]()
Jim, the simple answer is
Must have at least 32 car field Split the field in two (example 32 divided by 2 equals 16) 17th qualifier has to be .85 under First car in the second half has to be .85 under after final qualifying run Hope this helps |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: NS CANADA
Posts: 901
Likes: 1,715
Liked 405 Times in 158 Posts
|
![]()
Do you mean they never contacted you? I asked for the 300 ford to be dropped from 190 (ridiculously high) to the factory 155hp and while I never received any directly from them, the next updates showed the 300 ford in the "no change" column.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Conway, AR
Posts: 1,739
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 4 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Charlie contracted terminal lymphoma in about 1995 and passed away shortly thereafter, having never gotten the car within several tenths of being competitive, despite some excellent motors and chassis-tuning. In the ensuing years since his death, the factored horsepower has dropped like a rock for that motor, ending up some 63 horsepower under the horsepower it carried when he ran the car. SIXTY-THREE HORSEPOWER....And,they wouldn't even answer my letters with a reason of any kind, as to why the factored rating still stood at 350. That kind of idiocy is what I no longer even have an NHRA membership...
__________________
Bill Last edited by bill dedman; 01-01-2016 at 07:07 AM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|