|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Belmont N.S. Canada
Posts: 473
Likes: 246
Liked 166 Times in 71 Posts
|
![]()
My chevelle has the moroso 47160 springs, lightest in the catalog for 68-72. Now that the ride height is where I want it the springs are dead, too much cut off. Does anybody know which spring will have the same dimensions but be another 'step' softer? Possibly a 64-67 spring or maybe first gen camaro?
__________________
Chris Chapman 1969 Chevelle NHRA F-G/SA 1090 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Langley (no igloos), British Columbia, Canada
Posts: 569
Likes: 311
Liked 285 Times in 87 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Buffalo New York
Posts: 80
Likes: 10
Liked 49 Times in 11 Posts
|
![]()
I use a 64-67 spring in mine. Can't remember the number off hand but I can look if you want.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Henderson, NV
Posts: 584
Likes: 9
Liked 54 Times in 27 Posts
|
![]()
64-7 springs have both ends "tangential" meaning the end coil is round and wound tighter to the previous coil. 68-72 springs have the bottom tangential and the top "square" meaning the end coil is flat, not round in cross section. The frame pockets are different to mate to the correct spring.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|