|
|
![]() |
#1 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Egg Harbor Township, NJ
Posts: 1,467
Likes: 1,441
Liked 4,365 Times in 501 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
I guess what I want to know is what method is the most consistent for bracket racing? Predictable dial-ins? And not having to hook the laptop up before or after every pass to add/subtract fuel or guess on a fuel setting before first round? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Lower Slower Delaware
Posts: 535
Likes: 22
Liked 269 Times in 99 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Cells in fueling table of FAST 2.0 are VE values for the given load and RPM. Those values are developed by achieving the optimal HP for that cell (generally done a a dyno) recording the AF ratio. That optimal AF ratio is input the closed loop AF table in the related cell and becomes the target in closed loop or your tuning target open loop when adjusting at the track. In speed density open loop the system does not adjust to the live AF input from the O2 sensor but does use air temp and manifold pressure to calculate the optimal fueling to achieve that VE value in each cell of the fueling table. In closed loop AF valued from O2 sensor is used in addition to air temp and manifold pressure. Manifold pressure is effected by outside barometric pressure and engine vacuum with any restriction in the intake system. Once the correct VE values are input the car should be very consistent and write time slips. In my case it does when I leave it alone. With the FAST system you can run Alpha-N with MAP sensor open to atmosphere, I have not done it but others have been successful as XFI 2.0 has a change making it more to pressure changes seen from MAP sensor input. So you can use ALPHA-N and not need to tune over different or changing weather conditions. See you soon!
__________________
Frank Ferrucci I/SA 1271 "Be Thankful for the Gifts You are Given" |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
|
|