|
![]() |
#11 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,815
Likes: 2,903
Liked 5,120 Times in 1,951 Posts
|
![]()
Long uppers would raise the front end height on a 1st gen. Chevy II, ...which you don't want.
__________________
"We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for." Will Rogers |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Rancho Mirage, CA
Posts: 1,308
Likes: 300
Liked 881 Times in 452 Posts
|
![]()
Alan you are spot on when you say the early Nova front ends are different. The 68 and beyond are the same as a Camaro and that may give more options.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,815
Likes: 2,903
Liked 5,120 Times in 1,951 Posts
|
![]()
It seems to me that GM just copied Ford's better idea 60 Falcon
__________________
"We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for." Will Rogers |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Cocoa Florida
Posts: 205
Likes: 181
Liked 72 Times in 36 Posts
|
![]()
Thanks to everyone who took time to answer my questions . I didn't mean to take over the thread.
Thank You Kenney Kelley |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 155
Likes: 11
Liked 63 Times in 7 Posts
|
![]()
If you have an early Chevy II, my kit will keep the toe exactly as you set it, all through its travel. Call me at, 402 443 8424 If I happen to not answer, please leave a message.
Eddie Rezac |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 244
Likes: 1
Liked 7 Times in 6 Posts
|
![]()
Thanks for the replies. This still shot does show camber woes.
[IMG] ![]() Here's a short video that only shows the right side of the car. At about 25 seconds it goes slo mo and shows what's happening to the right side. I can't feel it when driving. I appreciate your thoughts. [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I3GIj3xdbnk"]Nova burnout and wheel stand at 75 and 80 dragway - YouTube[/ame] Last edited by Ron Gusack; 12-22-2013 at 12:44 PM. Reason: added |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
VIP Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Louisville , KY
Posts: 1,995
Likes: 68
Liked 279 Times in 68 Posts
|
![]()
We tried everything on my son Andrew's car and ended up having to put a steering damper on it. My car is just like his except he has wheelie bars and I don't. My car doesn't shimmy like his did. Both are 70-71 Camaros. The steering damper cured his car.
__________________
Greg Hill 4171 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 155
Likes: 11
Liked 63 Times in 7 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
A Chevy II of the 1968 and later can benefit from longer upper ball joints. The kit that I build is for the 1967, and older Chevy II. It is a completely bolt on kit, no bending, or modifying anything else, just follow my instruction sheet, and go racing. Eddie Rezac 402 443 8424 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 244
Likes: 1
Liked 7 Times in 6 Posts
|
![]()
The Global West control arms have standard BJ's. Is that because they're built in such a way that long ones aren't needed?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,111
Likes: 1,570
Liked 1,815 Times in 413 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
I don't think so. All you need are the Glodal West bushings and the 1-1/2" longer upper ball joints in stock A arms.
__________________
Alan Roehrich 212A G/S |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|