Looks like hp on Tuesday

Ed Wright · 10-30-2013, 10:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Andrew Hill

Absolutely. I would think it would make quite a bit more HP than a super stock LT1, and I assume you saw the qualifying sheet from Bowling Green this last weekend? The 352 at 330 HP is more under factored than an LS1 was at 305 or an LT1 was at 275.

They make quite a bit more than my SS LT1.

That HP hit didn't hurt them at all.

RJ Sledge · 10-30-2013, 10:27 AM

Yup......and it makes that on a bad day!!!

We're selling it though, want to build the 428 Windsor Combo, can't believe it will make over 880hp with the" new improved" pieces for 2014. Ford is releasing the info at SEMA this week, so keep an eye out for the news.

Hope to get some power knocked off so we can be competitive with the Copo's and the new Dodge's. It needs about 35 hp taken off. But it nots a Chevrolet so might be for naught. Maybe get ole Greg Hill to give us some pointers LOL.

RJ

Ed Carpenter · 10-30-2013, 10:47 AM

I guess I missed it. When did someone get 35hp off?

Andrew Hill · 10-30-2013, 11:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by deuces wild

I guess I missed it. When did someone get 35hp off?

The 1970 LT1 like I run was rated at 360 hp from the factory, but is rated 325 now, as it has been for many, many years. I don't think anyone in their right mind would consider building one at 360.

I want to know how to get smaller rod journals, a bigger carburetor, and Edelbrock heads legalized for my combo, or is that just ok for Fords?

RJ Sledge · 10-30-2013, 11:24 AM

Ed

Its just a guess you understand.....but I think it was the 1970 350/360 hp Camaro Combo that somehow got a 35 hp reduction at the beginning of 2003. I believe it is now a whopping 325 hp.

How many times have you seen that happen??

Makes you wonder! LOL

RJ

Jeff Teuton · 10-30-2013, 11:57 AM

Andrew, you got a 780 Holley which will flow more than a 1000 cfm throttle body. A 1000 cfm has 750 holes in the bottom. Looking at the specs on your motor, makes mine look like the truck motor it is derived froml 11 to one, same roller rockers I got, same cam, choice of 8 heads, some new manifold that nobody knows about, big carb (whichcfm for cfm will make more power-according to the manifold makers) and 325, all the 350's in 70 and 71 are suspect. If I had that I could run 9.70s and RJ could run 9.60's cause he is a better tuner. I guess you guys are in your right mind. I had a 35 Hudson Teraplane fastback with a V12 Hemi that got 10 off, and Sammy P. has gotten about 200 off that 427 thing he runs. RJ, nobody likes us old guys. I'm gonna complain to the AARP.

Alan Roehrich · 10-30-2013, 05:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jeff Teuton

Andrew, you got a 780 Holley which will flow more than a 1000 cfm throttle body. A 1000 cfm has 750 holes in the bottom. Looking at the specs on your motor, makes mine look like the truck motor it is derived froml 11 to one, same roller rockers I got, same cam, choice of 8 heads, some new manifold that nobody knows about, big carb (whichcfm for cfm will make more power-according to the manifold makers) and 325, all the 350's in 70 and 71 are suspect. If I had that I could run 9.70s and RJ could run 9.60's cause he is a better tuner. I guess you guys are in your right mind. I had a 35 Hudson Teraplane fastback with a V12 Hemi that got 10 off, and Sammy P. has gotten about 200 off that 427 thing he runs. RJ, nobody likes us old guys. I'm gonna complain to the AARP.

Jeff, unless I miss my guess, I'm pretty sure the 1000 cfm EFI throttle body does not have a big booster venturi hanging out in the middle of each of those 750 cfm Holley sized throttle bores. I'm pretty sure those are a considerable restriction.

Chad Rhodes · 10-30-2013, 05:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alan Roehrich

Jeff, unless I miss my guess, I'm pretty sure the 1000 cfm EFI throttle body does not have a big booster venturi hanging out in the middle of each of those 750 cfm Holley sized throttle bores. I'm pretty sure those are a considerable restriction.

It also flows only air, no fuel

Frank B. · 10-30-2013, 06:01 PM

I never sat in one of those new Mustangs but they must be hard to see out of to take a 1/2 second stripe on a heads up run.

Comp 798 · 10-30-2013, 12:00 PM

From: Kershaw, Jesse (JM.) (jkershaw@ford.com) This sender is in your contact list.
Sent: Wed 10/30/13 2:46 PM
To: 'Sam Tufano' (sam_tufano@hotmail.com)

I’m not sure what RJ is talking about. We aren’t releasing anything.

We are working on a new 429 for the 2014 model that has different heads but they would not be backwards compatible.

10-30-2013, 10:27 AM	#2
RJ Sledge Senior Member Join Date: Jun 2007 Posts: 790 Likes: 504 Liked 292 Times in 92 Posts	Re: Looks like hp on Tuesday Yup......and it makes that on a bad day!!! We're selling it though, want to build the 428 Windsor Combo, can't believe it will make over 880hp with the" new improved" pieces for 2014. Ford is releasing the info at SEMA this week, so keep an eye out for the news. Hope to get some power knocked off so we can be competitive with the Copo's and the new Dodge's. It needs about 35 hp taken off. But it nots a Chevrolet so might be for naught. Maybe get ole Greg Hill to give us some pointers LOL. RJ

10-30-2013, 10:47 AM	#3
Ed Carpenter Live Reporter Join Date: May 2006 Location: Dripping Springs, Tx Posts: 2,709 Likes: 186 Liked 520 Times in 132 Posts	Re: Looks like hp on Tuesday I guess I missed it. When did someone get 35hp off? __________________ Ed Carpenter 2005 Chevy Cobalt A/SM Race Engine Development

10-30-2013, 11:24 AM	#5
RJ Sledge Senior Member Join Date: Jun 2007 Posts: 790 Likes: 504 Liked 292 Times in 92 Posts	Re: Looks like hp on Tuesday Ed Its just a guess you understand.....but I think it was the 1970 350/360 hp Camaro Combo that somehow got a 35 hp reduction at the beginning of 2003. I believe it is now a whopping 325 hp. How many times have you seen that happen?? Makes you wonder! LOL RJ

10-30-2013, 11:57 AM	#6
Jeff Teuton VIP Member Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: Houma, LA Posts: 2,717 Likes: 2 Liked 325 Times in 50 Posts	Re: Looks like hp on Tuesday Andrew, you got a 780 Holley which will flow more than a 1000 cfm throttle body. A 1000 cfm has 750 holes in the bottom. Looking at the specs on your motor, makes mine look like the truck motor it is derived froml 11 to one, same roller rockers I got, same cam, choice of 8 heads, some new manifold that nobody knows about, big carb (whichcfm for cfm will make more power-according to the manifold makers) and 325, all the 350's in 70 and 71 are suspect. If I had that I could run 9.70s and RJ could run 9.60's cause he is a better tuner. I guess you guys are in your right mind. I had a 35 Hudson Teraplane fastback with a V12 Hemi that got 10 off, and Sammy P. has gotten about 200 off that 427 thing he runs. RJ, nobody likes us old guys. I'm gonna complain to the AARP. __________________ Jeff Teuton 4022 STK Last edited by Jeff Teuton; 10-30-2013 at 11:59 AM.

10-30-2013, 06:01 PM	#9
Frank B. Member Join Date: Jun 2007 Posts: 141 Likes: 0 Liked 51 Times in 25 Posts	Re: Looks like hp on Tuesday I never sat in one of those new Mustangs but they must be hard to see out of to take a 1/2 second stripe on a heads up run.

10-30-2013, 12:00 PM	#10
Comp 798 Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Posts: 103 Likes: 1 Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts	Re: Looks like hp on Tuesday From: Kershaw, Jesse (JM.) (jkershaw@ford.com) This sender is in your contact list. Sent: Wed 10/30/13 2:46 PM To: 'Sam Tufano' (sam_tufano@hotmail.com) I’m not sure what RJ is talking about. We aren’t releasing anything. We are working on a new 429 for the 2014 model that has different heads but they would not be backwards compatible. __________________ Sam Tufano