Submit 2014 Rule Change Requests

Alan Roehrich · 07-08-2013, 05:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Larry Hill

If it sounded like that I was attacking Travis nothing could be further from the truth. Travis is always a stand up guy who loves the sport as much as we do. What I was doing was asking the question what rule, rules, or suggestion we as racers could come up with to make competing with the new cars (2008-up) fair.

Larry, by no means was I saying you of all people, or anyone else, for that matter, was attacking Travis. We've all been good friends far too long for that.

My post was merely meant to be a nudge to keep the thread about Travis' reminder to us, rather than have it go off in another direction.

As far as a rule for racers to suggest to make it fair, let's just say that's better off with a thread of its own, which will not be pretty, they've all turned ugly since those cars were put in the guide.

Jeff Stout · 07-09-2013, 11:05 AM

Do you think the belt manufactures would keep the same price to re-cert or just ad more for having a longer cert? What would we gain?

Sam Capizzi Jr · 07-09-2013, 01:50 PM

How about changing the ahfs so that it reviews after the 6th 12th 18th and final event... That will speed up the process

JeremyDuncan · 07-09-2013, 02:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sam Capizzi Jr

How about changing the ahfs so that it reviews after the 6th 12th 18th and final event... That will speed up the process

I like this idea.

countrypuppy4865 · 07-09-2013, 06:05 PM

Good idea on AHFS. I think atleast 3 review periods would be good but 4 may even be better.

Ed Wright · 07-09-2013, 06:09 PM

I agree. Four would be even better.

Jeff Teuton · 07-09-2013, 08:45 PM

originally it was 3 times, but later changed to 2. I have proposed for the umpthteen time to make it a system of averages and quit mixing a dynamic eliminator with static numbers. Not a good match. We shall see.

07-09-2013, 11:05 AM	#2
Jeff Stout VIP Member Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: phoenix Posts: 1,492 Likes: 67 Liked 708 Times in 285 Posts	Re: Submit 2014 Rule Change Requests Do you think the belt manufactures would keep the same price to re-cert or just ad more for having a longer cert? What would we gain?

07-09-2013, 01:50 PM	#3
Sam Capizzi Jr Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Rochester NY Posts: 131 Likes: 26 Liked 43 Times in 9 Posts	Re: Submit 2014 Rule Change Requests How about changing the ahfs so that it reviews after the 6th 12th 18th and final event... That will speed up the process __________________ Sam Capizzi Jr. 1301 SS/AS 93 Dodge Daytona R/SA 73 Dodge Dart

07-09-2013, 06:05 PM	#5
countrypuppy4865 Senior Member Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: Donaldsonville, LA Posts: 984 Likes: 17 Liked 229 Times in 71 Posts	Re: Submit 2014 Rule Change Requests Good idea on AHFS. I think atleast 3 review periods would be good but 4 may even be better. __________________ Jimmy "Cooter" Hidalgo, Jr. 4865 E/SA '04 GTO 4865 SS/GA '99 Firebird

07-09-2013, 06:09 PM	#6
Ed Wright Veteran Member Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Sand Springs, OK Posts: 8,132 Likes: 896 Liked 390 Times in 170 Posts	Re: Submit 2014 Rule Change Requests I agree. Four would be even better. __________________ Ed Wright 4156 SS/JA

07-09-2013, 08:45 PM	#7
Jeff Teuton VIP Member Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: Houma, LA Posts: 2,717 Likes: 2 Liked 325 Times in 50 Posts	Re: Submit 2014 Rule Change Requests originally it was 3 times, but later changed to 2. I have proposed for the umpthteen time to make it a system of averages and quit mixing a dynamic eliminator with static numbers. Not a good match. We shall see. __________________ Jeff Teuton 4022 STK