|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,810
Likes: 2,901
Liked 5,114 Times in 1,948 Posts
|
![]()
Anybody know the CFM rating on that (AFB) carb ?
__________________
"We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for." Will Rogers |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Arizona, Texan forever
Posts: 1,176
Likes: 878
Liked 574 Times in 212 Posts
|
![]()
Mark, I am 99% sure it is 575 CFM....I was planning on putting a 300 HP in this Nova for SS/IA when finances (and too many cars) got in my way....LOL
__________________
Gary Hansen - SS/FA 4911, B/SA 4911 Last edited by SStockDart; 11-18-2015 at 07:22 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Covina, CA
Posts: 474
Likes: 106
Liked 89 Times in 19 Posts
|
![]()
Mark,
I was never sure of the rated CFM but it never seemed to be able to produce the extra 50 horsepower on the 327 that the General assigned it. On the other hand, if the 300 horsepower manifold had never been cast, where would the 283 cars have ever found that last 50? c
__________________
Chuck Norton |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,487
Likes: 3,588
Liked 7,685 Times in 1,732 Posts
|
![]()
Something else that should be "fixed".
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS I'm not spending 100K to win 2K |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,810
Likes: 2,901
Liked 5,114 Times in 1,948 Posts
|
![]()
Thanks...So it's 15 hp in a 65 Chevelle as of now ... roughly 180 lbs in J/SA over a 4GC..
I don't see it carrying that difference...Of course, without a dyno sheet.....???
__________________
"We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for." Will Rogers |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
|
![]()
Yes, I believe it IS 575 CFM. EXACTLY the same measurements as the dual 4 barrel carbs on a 409.
__________________
Aubrey N Bruneau 6409 C/S 62 BelAir sport coupe, 409 HP 409 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Beaverdam, Va./ Port St. Lucie,Fla.
Posts: 362
Likes: 177
Liked 154 Times in 37 Posts
|
![]()
Mark, Cupp has answers to all those questions. Dyno comparisons, on track back to back, every trans. and rear gear combination you can think of. We have MIR again on Monday and he will be beating the tar out of the green bean again. ------ I'm going to quit parking beside him----------Danny
![]()
__________________
66W30POST |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Glendora,Calif.
Posts: 1,135
Likes: 172
Liked 704 Times in 218 Posts
|
![]()
Seems to me that the 409 340 horse engine of 1963-65 had a BIG 4 jet on it. 394 Olds motors and the big Buicks got it as well. Heard of a fellow putting one on a 283-220 horse and getting a BIG quantum jump in horsepower with it. I had a 65 Impala SS convertible with a 409 340 horse and a 4 speed, but I ran an AFB on it,since they were easier to maintain. That car was a real road monster with the 3.31 gears, and it would tow about anything. Nothing like torque.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|