|
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,822
Likes: 2,916
Liked 5,133 Times in 1,957 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
I doubt you would have gotten away with anything more than an OEM type PCV back then.. Unless you were just using a Stocker for testing purposes ?
__________________
"We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for." Will Rogers |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: The Lowcountry.
Posts: 2,997
Likes: 2,634
Liked 2,746 Times in 969 Posts
|
![]()
What I'm personally attempting to gain and learn from my initial question, having very limited knowledge of the subject in general and it's application to Stock Eliminator rules is, what is the current set up for the heavy hitters?
Also why does N.H.R.A. not allow valve cover breathers to be evacuated into the header collectors in Stock? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Southeastern Pa.
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
other openings closed up and on the other side I used an anti backfire flapper valve that I got from SRD, there were no openings in the system and the crankcase would hold a good vacuum at idle . I did not and could not run hoses to the headers. This may not have been an optimum system,but I did experiment with it a couple of times. From what I remember I didnt see any improvement ,that didnt mean it didnt have potential though. ed |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sand Springs, OK
Posts: 8,132
Likes: 896
Liked 390 Times in 170 Posts
|
![]()
I tried the hoses to the collectors at the track (not this car) when that stuff first came out. Never found a thing. I tried a slick little check valve with two PVC valves and a closed crank case on the dyno. Pulled good vacuum to about 5000, then it went away. No pressure as high as we were pulling it then (7700) but no power gain. Finally went to one PVC on one side, and a breather on the other. It's a legal vacuum leak, so you may as well use the highest flowing PVC valve you can find. LOL No more condensation in the valve covers that time of the year either. Didn't back-to-back-to-back it, but appeared to be a couple above 8000. Guess it depends on how well yours would like a larger TB.
__________________
Ed Wright 4156 SS/JA |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,423
Likes: 541
Liked 333 Times in 180 Posts
|
![]()
Late 60's-early 70's GM Power brake check valve on the valve cover & then hose to the intake manifold and DO NOT forget to turn the main seals around!!!-- FED 387
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Boulder City, Nevada 89005
Posts: 2,737
Likes: 2,813
Liked 2,489 Times in 699 Posts
|
![]()
I tried a road draft tube on my 340 about Fifteen years ago and first race they
made me pull it right off!! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Verrry South Jersey
Posts: 537
Likes: 134
Liked 251 Times in 125 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Anyhow, I thought about that after I posted that. Our car was a '71, so I guess it wouldn't have been legal, either. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,822
Likes: 2,916
Liked 5,133 Times in 1,957 Posts
|
![]()
That would be 1962 Fed. and 1959 Ca. I believe
__________________
"We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for." Will Rogers |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Southeastern Pa.
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
ed |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Southeastern Pa.
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Yes, yes it's all comming back to me now ! Was that for the single ring piston that was being experimented with. I believe one of my friends went to a Manley seminar back then and thought this new style ring ,piston combination was going to be " to die for" ed |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|