|
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 244
Likes: 1
Liked 7 Times in 6 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: New Holland, PA Mooresville,NC
Posts: 1,163
Likes: 238
Liked 16 Times in 11 Posts
|
![]()
Cal-trac, cheapest , easy to work on, they can walk you through the prosess. There are many Nova's running them, just look at the pictures posted on this site.
__________________
Bob Pagano A/SA |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 244
Likes: 1
Liked 7 Times in 6 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: New Holland, PA Mooresville,NC
Posts: 1,163
Likes: 238
Liked 16 Times in 11 Posts
|
![]()
Yes ! Just look, pictures abound all over the net, many bracket cars and Stockers run them. The reason ? they work. Add them and get your front end to work then hang on !
__________________
Bob Pagano A/SA |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,104
Likes: 1,560
Liked 1,784 Times in 407 Posts
|
![]()
With ladder bars and leaf springs, the rear end housing must be mounted in "floaters" in order for the leaf springs and ladder bars to work without binding.
If you do not have something like this : http://www.competitionengineering.co...?CatCode=10047 on your car, and you're running ladder bars and leaf springs, your rear suspension simply does not work. Given the choice, I'd never bother with ladder bars again, ever. If I wanted full aftermarket rear suspension, it would be a four link with a wishbone locater and coil over shocks. For a car like yours, if you do not intend to go faster than 9.30 or so, and you want to run smaller tires, say 9" and 12" slicks, the by all means I'd put a complete Cal Tracs system under it, their leaf springs, their bars, their mounts, and their shocks. Sure, full aftermarket suspension is the ultimate, if it is allowed, and you're going really quick, it's the thing to have. But you're running in the mid nines, and you're running 9" tire classes at times. I would not go to the expense of a four link for that.
__________________
Alan Roehrich 212A G/S |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 244
Likes: 1
Liked 7 Times in 6 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
The thing that turned me off to CalTracs was a video of a rear rotating what I thought was a long way on a car with Cal Tracs. Paste this in and have a look. http://flic.kr/p/cfLT6W Here's another shot from the back. http://www.flickr.com/photos/simpkinsfamily/7387114350/ Isn't that a Cal trac system? I can't see how my set-up could possibly rotate that much. It looks bad to me Last edited by Ron Gusack; 08-21-2012 at 11:35 PM. Reason: edit |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,104
Likes: 1,560
Liked 1,784 Times in 407 Posts
|
![]()
Ron, there are big block Chevy cars that weight 3400# going mid nines on 9" tires with the CalTracs setup. It works, there's not a lot more to say.
I have no idea how the car in the video is set up. On a 9" tire we're carrying the front wheels all the way to high gear consistently with CalTracs and the rest of the setup I described. If we can't hook, no one can. There are big tire cars that will go home if we so much as spin the tires a 1/2 turn.
__________________
Alan Roehrich 212A G/S |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|