|
02-17-2011, 04:53 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 882
Likes: 980
Liked 613 Times in 182 Posts
|
1969 351W Stocker
Has anyone raced a 1969 Ford 351W in stock? I was told this is not a good combination and would like some imput, good or bad. Thanks, Dyno. Post it on here or email me at dyno5583@aol.com or call 763-227-3366
|
02-17-2011, 07:18 PM | #2 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Bardstown, KY
Posts: 1,929
Likes: 100
Liked 329 Times in 117 Posts
|
Re: 1969 351W Stocker
I looked into that same engine. Rated at 290 hp.
Seems a bit high considering the valve size, cam specs, and other restrictions.
__________________
Alan Mackin Stock 3777/ SS 3377 P/SA & SS/PA Fox Thunderbird I/PS '95 Mustang GT |
02-17-2011, 08:35 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Saint John NB Canada
Posts: 560
Likes: 27
Liked 6 Times in 5 Posts
|
Re: 1969 351W Stocker
What's the factored HP ? Maybe NHRA would derate it some ?
|
02-17-2011, 09:03 PM | #4 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: michigan
Posts: 162
Likes: 251
Liked 19 Times in 7 Posts
|
Re: 1969 351W Stocker
Just as a comparison, the 1970 351c has much bigger heads, a bigger autolite carb, same compression, same lift cam and is only rated at 10 horsepower more. The 351c is a marginally competetive combination versus the other cars that run g/s and g/sa. The 69-70 boss 302 has a 780 holley carb, bigger mechanical cam,bigger heads, 50 less cubes, more rpm potential, lighter rotating assembly and is rated at 305 horsepower, also as a comparasion. The autolite carb can be made to work, but is a major pain to work with, and would be a good reason to pass on this combo.
__________________
ss/gt 93 t-bird |
02-17-2011, 09:32 PM | #5 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Bison, KS
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: 1969 351W Stocker
A friend of mine Al Nulman raced one of these when they were new. He had a relatively high dollar effort and soon swiched to a 428. He was not happy.
__________________
Stock - 5013 |
02-18-2011, 12:19 AM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 882
Likes: 980
Liked 613 Times in 182 Posts
|
Re: 1969 351W Stocker
If it was in the 240-250 range, it would be OK. You are right, the 351C is only 10 HP higher @ 300. Anyone else try running one. Thanks, Dyno
|
02-18-2011, 03:40 AM | #7 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: jackson
Posts: 1,165
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 3 Posts
|
Re: 1969 351W Stocker
Rated to high. I don't think NHRA will ever drop it to 240or 250. But in SS it's rated @ 260....@ 270 it could be an OK combo.
__________________
Greg Fulk 308 308X P/SA "ALL AMERICAN" |
|
|