HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock Tech
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-17-2011, 04:53 PM   #1
Dyno
Senior Member
 
Dyno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 882
Likes: 980
Liked 613 Times in 182 Posts
Default 1969 351W Stocker

Has anyone raced a 1969 Ford 351W in stock? I was told this is not a good combination and would like some imput, good or bad. Thanks, Dyno. Post it on here or email me at dyno5583@aol.com or call 763-227-3366
Dyno is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2011, 07:18 PM   #2
ALMACK
VIP Member
 
ALMACK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Bardstown, KY
Posts: 1,929
Likes: 100
Liked 329 Times in 117 Posts
Default Re: 1969 351W Stocker

I looked into that same engine. Rated at 290 hp.
Seems a bit high considering the valve size, cam specs, and other restrictions.
__________________
Alan Mackin Stock 3777/ SS 3377
P/SA & SS/PA Fox Thunderbird
I/PS '95 Mustang GT
ALMACK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2011, 08:35 PM   #3
Todd Boyer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Saint John NB Canada
Posts: 560
Likes: 27
Liked 6 Times in 5 Posts
Default Re: 1969 351W Stocker

What's the factored HP ? Maybe NHRA would derate it some ?
Todd Boyer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2011, 09:03 PM   #4
dwydendorf
Member
 
dwydendorf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: michigan
Posts: 162
Likes: 251
Liked 19 Times in 7 Posts
Default Re: 1969 351W Stocker

Just as a comparison, the 1970 351c has much bigger heads, a bigger autolite carb, same compression, same lift cam and is only rated at 10 horsepower more. The 351c is a marginally competetive combination versus the other cars that run g/s and g/sa. The 69-70 boss 302 has a 780 holley carb, bigger mechanical cam,bigger heads, 50 less cubes, more rpm potential, lighter rotating assembly and is rated at 305 horsepower, also as a comparasion. The autolite carb can be made to work, but is a major pain to work with, and would be a good reason to pass on this combo.
__________________
ss/gt 93 t-bird
dwydendorf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2011, 09:32 PM   #5
John Quinn
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Bison, KS
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: 1969 351W Stocker

A friend of mine Al Nulman raced one of these when they were new. He had a relatively high dollar effort and soon swiched to a 428. He was not happy.
__________________
Stock - 5013
John Quinn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2011, 12:19 AM   #6
Dyno
Senior Member
 
Dyno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 882
Likes: 980
Liked 613 Times in 182 Posts
Default Re: 1969 351W Stocker

If it was in the 240-250 range, it would be OK. You are right, the 351C is only 10 HP higher @ 300. Anyone else try running one. Thanks, Dyno
Dyno is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2011, 03:40 AM   #7
greg fulk
VIP Member
 
greg fulk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: jackson
Posts: 1,165
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 3 Posts
Wink Re: 1969 351W Stocker

Rated to high. I don't think NHRA will ever drop it to 240or 250. But in SS it's rated @ 260....@ 270 it could be an OK combo.
__________________
Greg Fulk 308 308X P/SA "ALL AMERICAN"
greg fulk is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:58 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.