|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Dover, FL
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Setting aside any performance gain, I think aluminum drive shafts increase the life of the ring and pinion, axles, etc., by absorbing some of the shock load on launch. Any experiences to that effect? BTW - I even heard Warren Johnson make a statement to that effect, for whatever that's worth. I'm just a hack, but I thought I would bring up the subject. Thanks.
__________________
Jeff Kitchen 1972 Buick GS - Stock Susp, 462 Buick Stg 2, 3500 lbs 9.93@131 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,428
Likes: 560
Liked 335 Times in 182 Posts
|
![]()
maybe no performance advantage but ya are taking WEIGHT outa the car--Comp 387
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Live Reporter
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Dripping Springs, Tx
Posts: 2,710
Likes: 187
Liked 520 Times in 132 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
My car is 65lbs heavy for H. Maybe more if I get some HP off. LOL
__________________
Ed Carpenter 2005 Chevy Cobalt A/SM Race Engine Development |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Woodburn, Or
Posts: 688
Likes: 84
Liked 806 Times in 246 Posts
|
![]()
In case anyone is wondering about weights, my 3" steel driveshaft weighs 13#, the duplicate 3" alum with the same size yoke and ujoints weighs 10#. I didn't do back to back runs so don't have any data on performance differences.
Jim Caughlin SS 6019 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,428
Likes: 560
Liked 335 Times in 182 Posts
|
![]()
OK guys not sure what if any performance advantage if there is one but the BIG 3 have been installing aluminum driveshafts in rear wheel drive vehicles from Camaros to Lincolns to full size pick ups/vans etc for about 20 years---there must be a reason they are doing it--anybody wanna guess why a multi billion dollar company would do it?? It aint the color of silver vs. black or rust so why do ya think they are doing it????? comp 387
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Where the Green Grass Grows, AL
Posts: 2,375
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Chad Rhodes 2113 I/SA |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Berthoud, Coloraduh
Posts: 695
Likes: 13
Liked 8 Times in 7 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 257
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Henderson, NV
Posts: 586
Likes: 9
Liked 56 Times in 29 Posts
|
![]()
Aluminum shafts are illegal in most stockers, not steel. Some at yellow bullet swear aluminum gives them a few hundredths. My guess is that if you run a thick wall, long 4" steel shaft, there could be some gain with aluminum.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Tacoma, WA
Posts: 258
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
I don’t think you can really make a blanket comparison between steel and aluminum drive shafts. Beneficial to some not to others, there is a lot of things to consider when swapping them out and seldom are the new and old physically comparable. One would first think that if its lighter it will take less energy to accelerate… well not necessarily if you take a small diameter steel shaft and replace it with a lighter large diameter shaft.
Here is an example 7000 rpm a 3” shaft will have a surface speed of 5498 feet per minute 7000 rpm a 4” shaft will have a surface speed of 7330 feet per minute a 33% higher speed Using basic physics equations like Ke=1/2mv^2 if they weigh the same and most of the mass is in the tube not the end yokes the 4 inch shaft will take roughly 78% more energy to accelerate to 7000 rpm. If you do all the math the 4” shaft would have to be about 40% lighter to take the same amount of energy to accelerate as the 3” shaft. What this exercise shows is that most comparisons are apples to oranges you probably won’t see any gains unless you are replacing your current shaft with something lighter and the same or smaller diameter. And this is without taking into consideration what’s going on in the rest of the car. For something as simple as a drive shaft there is no simple answer.
__________________
Bill Edgeworth 6471 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|