HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock Tech
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-23-2010, 10:10 AM   #1
Jeff Kitchen
Junior Member
 
Jeff Kitchen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Dover, FL
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Steel vs Aluminum driveshaft

Setting aside any performance gain, I think aluminum drive shafts increase the life of the ring and pinion, axles, etc., by absorbing some of the shock load on launch. Any experiences to that effect? BTW - I even heard Warren Johnson make a statement to that effect, for whatever that's worth. I'm just a hack, but I thought I would bring up the subject. Thanks.
__________________
Jeff Kitchen
1972 Buick GS - Stock Susp, 462 Buick Stg 2, 3500 lbs
9.93@131
Jeff Kitchen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2010, 12:22 PM   #2
FED 387
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,428
Likes: 560
Liked 335 Times in 182 Posts
Default Re: Steel vs Aluminum driveshaft

maybe no performance advantage but ya are taking WEIGHT outa the car--Comp 387
FED 387 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2010, 01:32 PM   #3
Ed Carpenter
Live Reporter
 
Ed Carpenter's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Dripping Springs, Tx
Posts: 2,710
Likes: 187
Liked 520 Times in 132 Posts
Default Re: Steel vs Aluminum driveshaft

Quote:
Originally Posted by FED 387 View Post
maybe no performance advantage but ya are taking WEIGHT outa the car--Comp 387

My car is 65lbs heavy for H. Maybe more if I get some HP off. LOL
__________________
Ed Carpenter
2005 Chevy Cobalt A/SM
Race Engine Development
Ed Carpenter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2010, 08:07 PM   #4
Jim Caughlin
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Woodburn, Or
Posts: 688
Likes: 84
Liked 806 Times in 246 Posts
Default Re: Steel vs Aluminum driveshaft

In case anyone is wondering about weights, my 3" steel driveshaft weighs 13#, the duplicate 3" alum with the same size yoke and ujoints weighs 10#. I didn't do back to back runs so don't have any data on performance differences.

Jim Caughlin
SS 6019
Jim Caughlin is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2010, 09:08 PM   #5
FED 387
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,428
Likes: 560
Liked 335 Times in 182 Posts
Question Re: Steel vs Aluminum driveshaft

OK guys not sure what if any performance advantage if there is one but the BIG 3 have been installing aluminum driveshafts in rear wheel drive vehicles from Camaros to Lincolns to full size pick ups/vans etc for about 20 years---there must be a reason they are doing it--anybody wanna guess why a multi billion dollar company would do it?? It aint the color of silver vs. black or rust so why do ya think they are doing it????? comp 387
FED 387 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2010, 12:13 AM   #6
Chad Rhodes
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Where the Green Grass Grows, AL
Posts: 2,375
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Default Re: Steel vs Aluminum driveshaft

Quote:
Originally Posted by FED 387 View Post
OK guys not sure what if any performance advantage if there is one but the BIG 3 have been installing aluminum driveshafts in rear wheel drive vehicles from Camaros to Lincolns to full size pick ups/vans etc for about 20 years---there must be a reason they are doing it--anybody wanna guess why a multi billion dollar company would do it?? It aint the color of silver vs. black or rust so why do ya think they are doing it????? comp 387
harmonic vibration
__________________
Chad Rhodes 2113 I/SA
Chad Rhodes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2010, 07:43 PM   #7
Tom keedle
Senior Member
 
Tom keedle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Berthoud, Coloraduh
Posts: 695
Likes: 13
Liked 8 Times in 7 Posts
Default Re: Steel vs Aluminum driveshaft

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chad Rhodes View Post
harmonic vibration

yep, that's what they tell me,too.mostly OD trans' have that problem for some reason.
Tom keedle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2010, 02:25 AM   #8
KingReptile
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 257
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Talking Re: Steel vs Aluminum driveshaft

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeff Kitchen View Post
Setting aside any performance gain, I think aluminum drive shafts increase the life of the ring and pinion, axles, etc., by absorbing some of the shock load on launch. Any experiences to that effect? BTW - I even heard Warren Johnson make a statement to that effect, for whatever that's worth. I'm just a hack, but I thought I would bring up the subject. Thanks.
Its Safer too what would you rather lose a big chunk of steel or alumium??? Arent steel driveshafts illegal in stock in cars that didnt have them from the factory in NHRA still?!?!?
KingReptile is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2010, 12:18 PM   #9
Run to Rund
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Henderson, NV
Posts: 586
Likes: 9
Liked 56 Times in 29 Posts
Default Re: Steel vs Aluminum driveshaft

Aluminum shafts are illegal in most stockers, not steel. Some at yellow bullet swear aluminum gives them a few hundredths. My guess is that if you run a thick wall, long 4" steel shaft, there could be some gain with aluminum.
Run to Rund is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2010, 01:32 PM   #10
Bill Edgeworth
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Tacoma, WA
Posts: 258
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Steel vs Aluminum driveshaft

I don’t think you can really make a blanket comparison between steel and aluminum drive shafts. Beneficial to some not to others, there is a lot of things to consider when swapping them out and seldom are the new and old physically comparable. One would first think that if its lighter it will take less energy to accelerate… well not necessarily if you take a small diameter steel shaft and replace it with a lighter large diameter shaft.
Here is an example
7000 rpm a 3” shaft will have a surface speed of 5498 feet per minute
7000 rpm a 4” shaft will have a surface speed of 7330 feet per minute a 33% higher speed
Using basic physics equations like Ke=1/2mv^2 if they weigh the same and most of the mass is in the tube not the end yokes the 4 inch shaft will take roughly 78% more energy to accelerate to 7000 rpm.
If you do all the math the 4” shaft would have to be about 40% lighter to take the same amount of energy to accelerate as the 3” shaft.
What this exercise shows is that most comparisons are apples to oranges you probably won’t see any gains unless you are replacing your current shaft with something lighter and the same or smaller diameter.
And this is without taking into consideration what’s going on in the rest of the car.

For something as simple as a drive shaft there is no simple answer.
__________________
Bill Edgeworth 6471 STK
Bill Edgeworth is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:39 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.