HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-18-2010, 01:03 PM   #1
X-TECH MAN
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Lake Placid, Florida
Posts: 3,203
Likes: 1,047
Liked 235 Times in 110 Posts
Thumbs up Re: Why No Protest?

Quote:
Originally Posted by alan roehrich View Post
you may see a decrease in rocker failures.

You cannot cut the head to get the springs on (unless i read the rule wrong), so you won't see small blocks going from a 1.25" spring to a 1.437" spring, and you won't see a big block going from 1.55" to 1.65".

What you will see is more beehive springs, since the rule is now clear. Honestly, all they did was to allow you to run any spring that fit in the original head without modifying the spring seat, you don't have to run a 1.55" dual with damper on a big block now, you can run a 1.55 dual without a damper, or a 1.55 beehive. Or a 1.437 dual, if you can find one stiff enough.

You need to understand what actually limits spring pressure, and it isn't just the size and configuration of the spring.

Do i see it as a further escalation of the stupidity? Sure. Do i see it as a major issue? Not nearly so much. There are bigger problems for us, as the payout gets further behind, the new cars get more out of control every year, the division schedules shrink as well as becoming more convoluted and conflicting, and a host of other things get worse. This valve spring rule is a drop in the bucket compared to the rest, going crazy over it compared to the other issues would be like wasting a $10 bill to save a dime.
x 2
X-TECH MAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2010, 01:37 PM   #2
Ed Wright
Veteran Member
 
Ed Wright's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sand Springs, OK
Posts: 8,132
Likes: 896
Liked 390 Times in 170 Posts
Default Re: Why No Protest?

Quote:
Originally Posted by x-tech man View Post
x 2
x 3
__________________
Ed Wright 4156 SS/JA
Ed Wright is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2010, 02:31 PM   #3
Dave Casey
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Hampden, MA
Posts: 1,207
Likes: 233
Liked 804 Times in 168 Posts
Default Re: Why No Protest?

It really is an insignificant change as, Yes, there are already springs that do the job. It may actually save some people money, as they are not limited to the configuration rules we had before. It took me a few sets to get a spring for my 427 that fit the "single spring with damper" required for my combo. With this rule, I would've had an easier and less expensive time getting the spring I needed.
__________________
Dave Casey 1330 STK
Dave Casey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2010, 02:45 PM   #4
Chad Rhodes
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Where the Green Grass Grows, AL
Posts: 2,375
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Default Re: Why No Protest?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave Casey View Post
It really is an insignificant change as, Yes, there are already springs that do the job. It may actually save some people money, as they are not limited to the configuration rules we had before. It took me a few sets to get a spring for my 427 that fit the "single spring with damper" required for my combo. With this rule, I would've had an easier and less expensive time getting the spring I needed.
very well put Dave. This is one rule change that may have a positive effect on the racer's budget.
__________________
Chad Rhodes 2113 I/SA
Chad Rhodes is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:14 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.