HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-25-2010, 01:23 PM   #1
Angelo DiTocco
Senior Member
 
Angelo DiTocco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: NY, NY
Posts: 750
Likes: 175
Liked 189 Times in 48 Posts
Default Re: Painting a new SS/GT G5 (Rich South)

These modifications have been allowed for a while.

I just think the NHRA should open those rules up to all SS cars though.
__________________
Angelo DiTocco
'98 Firebird SS/HA
'98 Firebird B/SA
Angelo DiTocco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2010, 01:45 PM   #2
novassdude
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: usa
Posts: 752
Likes: 204
Liked 136 Times in 49 Posts
Default Re: Painting a new SS/GT G5 (Rich South)

Been allowed or are legal? It should be the same thing but it is not. That is the problem. Some tech people let certain thing slide. Next thing you know they can’t stop it and rather than enforcing the rules they change the rule to what the cheaters are doing.
novassdude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2010, 01:57 PM   #3
Larry Fulton
Member
 
Larry Fulton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 271
Likes: 54
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Painting a new SS/GT G5 (Rich South)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Angelo DiTocco View Post
These modifications have been allowed for a while. I just think the NHRA should open those rules up to all SS cars though.
I'd disagree with that statement...

I'm certainly not a proponent of Tube Frame '55 Chevys, Dusters or Fairlanes for Super Stock?
That sounds like a Super Street or Super Gas car to me.

No wonder this **** is outta control!
__________________
Larry Fulton

Last edited by Larry Fulton; 05-25-2010 at 02:50 PM.
Larry Fulton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2010, 02:33 PM   #4
gmeyer
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 183
Likes: 45
Liked 35 Times in 16 Posts
Default Re: Painting a new SS/GT G5 (Rich South)

Are you a proponent of Tube Frame '55 Chevys and Dusters

Is'nt that called comp!!!!!!!!!!
gmeyer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2010, 02:50 PM   #5
Larry Fulton
Member
 
Larry Fulton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 271
Likes: 54
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Painting a new SS/GT G5 (Rich South)

Quote:
Originally Posted by gmeyer View Post
Are you a proponent of Tube Frame '55 Chevys and Dusters

Is'nt that called comp!!!!!!!!!!
....how about Super Gas / Super Street!!

Super Stock is now comprised of Comp Cars with Stocker motors....
and Stock has evolved into some high dollar - "hybrid" bracket class, where almost anything goes as well!
__________________
Larry Fulton

Last edited by Larry Fulton; 05-25-2010 at 03:04 PM.
Larry Fulton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2010, 02:48 PM   #6
Jason
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 237
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times in 5 Posts
Default Re: Painting a new SS/GT G5 (Rich South)

I'm not sure that its a case of some tech people letting certain things slide. I think it is more of nobody in tech ever looks. When was the last time you saw a techman get down on the ground and look under a car they are teching?

This illegal modification was seen because a picture was put on the forum. That picture was clearly evident to many readers that this car has illegal floors. Now it comes to light that there may be other SS/GT conversion cars out there that also have illegal floors.

Will the rule be enforced and floors replaced or will once again the powers that be cave and the rule get changed?
Jason is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2010, 08:46 PM   #7
Angelo DiTocco
Senior Member
 
Angelo DiTocco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: NY, NY
Posts: 750
Likes: 175
Liked 189 Times in 48 Posts
Default Re: Painting a new SS/GT G5 (Rich South)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Angelo DiTocco View Post
These modifications have been allowed for a while.

I just think the NHRA should open those rules up to all SS cars though.
BTW - I was also referring to the other allowances given to the construction of the FWD Conversions.... like the complete elimination of the factory K frame & the fabricated control arms. It makes the cars a lot safer and a lot easier to work on. (Albeit more expensive). I have no problem with it. But..... I'd like to be able to do that to my Firebird. It would make it a better car.

And to Rich South - Best of luck with the new car - it looks like a 1st class piece.
__________________
Angelo DiTocco
'98 Firebird SS/HA
'98 Firebird B/SA
Angelo DiTocco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2010, 09:03 PM   #8
Chris "drooze" Wertman
VIP Member
 
Chris "drooze" Wertman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Barberton Ohio
Posts: 1,114
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Painting a new SS/GT G5 (Rich South)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Angelo DiTocco View Post
BTW - I was also referring to the other allowances given to the construction of the FWD Conversions.... like the complete elimination of the factory K frame & the fabricated control arms. It makes the cars a lot safer and a lot easier to work on. (Albeit more expensive). I have no problem with it. But..... I'd like to be able to do that to my Firebird. It would make it a better car.

And to Rich South - Best of luck with the new car - it looks like a 1st class piece.
I heard a "story" from a Stocker about his motor mount location this weekend I want there so I cannot attest to its accuracy, but he had a modified K member , and he was incorrect on his location, it was almost 1inch too far forward. HE was a stand up guy to bring it to the NHRA's attention. Class in my book.

NHRA Tech told him, as long as it wasnt a rearward location, and hence a competitive relocation it was OK.

He has since changed it to "legal" location, but for a guy to say "Hey I screwed up" Mia Culpa.....well........good deal.

Makes horse sense to me.

Cheers

Chris
__________________
Chris "Drooze" Wertman 3132 (F/SA 2009 Challenger Drag Pak #24 with a best of 10.59)

Last edited by Chris "drooze" Wertman; 05-25-2010 at 09:05 PM.
Chris "drooze" Wertman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2010, 10:18 PM   #9
Ross Family Racing
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: St.Clairsville, Ohio
Posts: 459
Likes: 0
Liked 51 Times in 14 Posts
Default Re: Painting a new SS/GT G5 (Rich South)

I want to thank all of you that have enjoyed this post as intended. I will tell you that there is stock floorpan in this car. The rule says the driveshaft tunnel must be fully welded to the as built OEM floor. It does not say you must use the COMPLETE oem floor. I can tell you for a fact that there is oem floor in this vehicle.
I got more than a few Private Messages from racers that said they don't post pictures of their in process builds because of the exact reaction of many on this site.
These photos were posted for your enjoyment, it's sad what this thread has become.
Jeff Ross
Ross Family Racing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2010, 07:35 AM   #10
fredjohnston
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 341
Likes: 0
Liked 55 Times in 14 Posts
Default Re: Painting a new SS/GT G5 (Rich South)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ross Family Racing View Post
I will tell you that there is stock floorpan in this car. The rule says the driveshaft tunnel must be fully welded to the as built OEM floor. It does not say you must use the COMPLETE oem floor. I can tell you for a fact that there is oem floor in this vehicle. Jeff Ross
There is nothing oem about this floor.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	103_0082x.jpg
Views:	439
Size:	115.9 KB
ID:	3142  
fredjohnston is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:52 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.