HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock Tech
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-04-2009, 04:26 PM   #1
Bill Harris
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Ooltewah, TN
Posts: 421
Likes: 13
Liked 26 Times in 13 Posts
Default Stk/SS carbs

This forum is getting a little boring so I figure I'd start an argument.

I made an interesting observation in the NHRA rule book in the carb section. In every rule book I have up to and including 2005 the carb rule included the statement: "Replacement carburetors permitted provided they are the same model, type, throttle bore, venturi size and external appearance (e.g. fuel inlet location, smog versus non-smog differences."

This is a very useful rule for us who run old heaps since it is damn near impossible to find the OEM carbs with the numbers listed in the engine specs. For example, it lets me run an easily obtained Holley 3310-1 780 carb instead of the nearly impossible to find OEM 780 Holley.

Starting in 2006 and to date, the same rule exists, but without the "... and external appearance (e.g. fuel inlet location, smog versus non-smog differences)" part of the rule. So starting in 2006, the requirement that the replacement carb look the same as the OEM was dropped from the rule. This happened a few years ago but I don't recall any discussion about it.

First question would be, why the change? It's unlikely that NHRA changed it on a whim. Ya think someone quietly got a rule loosened up that was deemed beneficial? What engine combos would benefit from such a change?

Secondly, what are the ramifications of the change? Say I want to run a combo that originally used a 600 CFM Holley like an 1850. That would be a model 4160 (with the rear metering plate) and have 1-9/16" throttle bores, primary venturi of 1-1/4" and secondary venturi of 1-5/16" (that's "1563x1563/1250x1313" in NHRA spec sheet speak). The OEM carb has a single fuel inlet and side pivot float bowls.

With the external appearance rule change, is there any reason why I couldn't replace the side pivot bowls with center pivot "cathedral" bowls and use a dual-feed fuel line set-up with the Holley 34-2 conversion kit?

Similarly, there was a bunch of griping on the forum a while back about someone running secondary metering blocks on a Holley 4150 that had adjustable idle circuits, aka "four-corner idle". Why wouldn't that be legal under these rules? What about the new aluminum fuel bowls that Holley (and others) now have for the 4150's and 4160's? Are they also legal? (the ones with the fuel level sight glass are really handy). How about billet metering blocks?

I'm not too sure that many of these external things are a performance advantage on a Holley. Almost certainly billet metering blocks could be an advantage. Maybe the dual-feed on the 600 if it were running lean on the secondaries. But who cares if a carb has four-corner idle circuits? What difference does it make if the bowls are zinc or aluminum? Are there variations on some Carter or Rochester carbs that make one version better than another but have the same venturi and throttle sizes?

NHRA was pulling carbs off stockers at Bristol this year and measuring them. I don't recall anyone getting tossed, but I wonder if you had a four corner idle and aluminum bowls on a 4150 Holley if it would pass muster?
__________________
Bill Harris
ex 2172 STK
ex 2272 S/S
Bill Harris is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2009, 04:56 PM   #2
Alan Roehrich
Veteran Member
 
Alan Roehrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,090
Likes: 1,534
Liked 1,758 Times in 398 Posts
Default Re: Stk/SS carbs

I don't know about aluminum float bowls, but a real tech guy will bust you for 4 corner idle circuits on carbs that did not have them. Far as I know, billet metering blocks are not legal. Other than capacity, I can't see where float bowls are a big issue, you really can't save more than a couple of ounces of weight, and since you can run practically any fuel supply system, capacity can't be a real concern. Are 4 corner idle circuits a real performance advantage? Probably not, provided you are a really good tuner, especially since hardly anyone leaves from an idle.

Eventually, the issue becomes "How many changes are we going to allow?", and "How far from stock and original are we going to stray?" Stock Eliminator has gotten pretty radical and pretty far from the original intent. The line has to be drawn somewhere if Stock is to retain a real identity of its own.
__________________
Alan Roehrich
212A G/S
Alan Roehrich is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2009, 07:33 PM   #3
Crew Chief
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times in 6 Posts
Default Re: Stk/SS carbs

As I understand it the reason for the rule change a few years ago was to allow cars with Q-Jets to use either straight in or side inlet for the fuel line. The rule also allowed the use of early or late style Q-Jets on any year.

You better ask tech before you start changing anything on a Holley. And be sure you do have a correct Holley in your trailer if you try pushing the issue at a race without asking.
Crew Chief is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2009, 10:23 PM   #4
Rory McNeil
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: from Vancouver BC Canada, now in Nova Scotia
Posts: 1,305
Likes: 307
Liked 1,074 Times in 294 Posts
Default Re: Stk/SS carbs

Also, I wouldn`t be suprised if this "non OE look" deal was to allow QJet * Carter AFB/AVS racers to use the new Edelbrock carbs.
__________________
NHRA 6390 STK
M/S 85 Mustang
Rory McNeil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2009, 10:58 PM   #5
Aubrey N Bruneau
Member
 
Aubrey N Bruneau's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: South Eastern Alberta, Canada
Posts: 311
Likes: 6
Liked 7 Times in 3 Posts
Send a message via Yahoo to Aubrey N Bruneau
Default Re: Stk/SS carbs

Undoubtedly, Rory...
When I was in Mission, the tech guys DID have me remove one of my Edelbrock "AFB" carbs, and took measurements, etc.
__________________
Aubrey N Bruneau 6409 C/S
62 BelAir sport coupe, 409 HP 409
Aubrey N Bruneau is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:31 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.