74 Monte Carlo

[Tom keedle]

Originally Posted by Mark Yacavone

It better be set back ... with a 116 " wheelbase..
Probably a good reason why you don't see any.

ummm, 64-67 chevelles were 116" along with 68-71 chevelle wagons,elcaminos,+4drs...2dr 68-72's were 112"

[Mark Yacavone]

Originally Posted by Tom keedle

ummm, 64-67 chevelles were 116" along with 68-71 chevelle wagons,elcaminos,+4drs...2dr 68-72's were 112"

Nope..They were 115..same as GTO's
But they didn't have much front overhang, and big tug boats bumpers hanging off the front either.

[Tom keedle]

Originally Posted by Mark Yacavone

Nope..They were 115..same as GTO's
But they didn't have much front overhang, and big tug boats bumpers hanging off the front either.

you're right,sorta....
115 on 64-67's
68-72 4drs/wagons.elke's were 116


and i don't remember any setback on any monte carlo, just the jimmy durante noses

[Greg Reimer 7376]

Way back when I worked for Mission Chevrolet in San Gabriel, Calif. around 1979-1980. We always had a few demo cars to use for customer loan cars. One of them was a 1980 Monte Carlo with a turbo 231 V-6. It was a nightmare to work on, but was rather fast. They made only a very few of them that year, and I think they were in the 1981 lineup. Probably a genius that thinks out of the box could get one to work in Stock. It seems the Buick Regal turbo V-6 came out a bit later.
A car I had for a driver for several years was a red, black interior and vinyl top 71 Monte Carlo 350 4 barrel car. It had a fan shroud that looked like a black plastic trash can with the ends cut off. The wheel base on that car was extended by moving the front frame crossmember forward several inches and extending the frame horns where the core support and front bumper bolted on.The drive shaft was the same length as a Chevelle, so the extended wheel base was only to placate the long hood and front fenders. Talk about a setback!! Always wanted to try a 402/300 horse in that thing for I or J.

[Tom keedle]

http://www.ehow.com/list_7406702_spe...nte-carlo.html

[Tom Moock]

Freddiesboy1557, monte 1974, 350 2b.PQR, 400 2 bar. NOP, 350 4 bar. LMN,400 4 bar. MNO, 454 4bar. GHI/Stock. 400 4 barrel 270 hp looks like a choice,( same motor in super stock GT is rated at 324 hp.) 5 hp less than 350 but 50 more cubic in. Tom

[Bob Don]

Mark - My Caprice is 116 (but then again, it isn't quite a front runner lol).

[Irondog]

Originally Posted by Tom Moock

Freddiesboy1557, monte 1974, 350 2b.PQR, 400 2 bar. NOP, 350 4 bar. LMN,400 4 bar. MNO, 454 4bar. GHI/Stock. 400 4 barrel 270 hp looks like a choice,( same motor in super stock GT is rated at 324 hp.) 5 hp less than 350 but 50 more cubic in. Tom

Thats at 3900 lbs correct? In G,H or I?