HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-19-2012, 08:56 PM   #1
Lew Silverman
VIP Member
 
Lew Silverman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Newport News, VA
Posts: 1,435
Likes: 371
Liked 129 Times in 59 Posts
Default Re: Rocker Clarification is up!!!

I think they still need to add one line -

Aftermarket rocker arms must have same ratio as OEM for engine horsepower claimed

or

OEM or Aftermarket rocker arms with any ratio permitted

I do like the new rule about being able to reinforce an OEM steel rocker arm!

Lew
__________________
Lew Silverman #2070
"The Wagon Master" N/SA
Lew Silverman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2012, 10:34 PM   #2
Greg Reimer 7376
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Glendora,Calif.
Posts: 1,136
Likes: 172
Liked 705 Times in 219 Posts
Cool Re: Rocker Clarification is up!!!

Anybody have a brand name and part number? It would be nice to see what we need to buy.
Greg Reimer 7376 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2012, 11:55 PM   #3
Pat Cook
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Rocker Clarification is up!!!

http://www.nhra.com/UserFiles/file/2...01-19-2012.pdf
__________________
67 Ford Fairlane
F/SA
749
Pat Cook is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2012, 12:07 AM   #4
Alan Roehrich
Veteran Member
 
Alan Roehrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,113
Likes: 1,571
Liked 1,821 Times in 413 Posts
Default Re: Rocker Clarification is up!!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Greg Reimer 7376 View Post
Anybody have a brand name and part number? It would be nice to see what we need to buy.
Those, if they're going to be listed, would be in the "Accepted Products" list.

As of just now, there is no rocker arm category listed.
__________________
Alan Roehrich
212A G/S
Alan Roehrich is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2012, 09:23 AM   #5
Lew Silverman
VIP Member
 
Lew Silverman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Newport News, VA
Posts: 1,435
Likes: 371
Liked 129 Times in 59 Posts
Question Re: Rocker Clarification is up!!!

So if I show up with Harlan Sharp 1.7 roller rockers on my 327 I'm OK? Are they going to check the ratio?

Still a lot of "what if's"!

Lew
__________________
Lew Silverman #2070
"The Wagon Master" N/SA
Lew Silverman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2012, 10:21 AM   #6
Signman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Lower Slower Delaware
Posts: 535
Likes: 22
Liked 269 Times in 99 Posts
Default Re: Rocker Clarification is up!!!

Rocker Ratio is defined in your Engine Specifications in the guide.
__________________
Frank Ferrucci I/SA 1271 "Be Thankful for the Gifts You are Given"
Signman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2012, 10:37 AM   #7
ron mattson
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: cloquet mn
Posts: 466
Likes: 17
Liked 67 Times in 30 Posts
Default Re: Rocker Clarification is up!!!

I spoke to Nhra tech last friday and was told stock ratio, dont know why its not
on the new ammendment. As pointed out earlier it is in the engine blueprints and
probably why nothing has changed ratio wise. I was also told there will not be a accepted
or required list, Any commercially available unit that fits the outlined requirements
will be just fine.
__________________
Ron Mattson 5015 STK

Last edited by ron mattson; 01-20-2012 at 10:39 AM. Reason: changes
ron mattson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2012, 02:50 PM   #8
Lew Silverman
VIP Member
 
Lew Silverman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Newport News, VA
Posts: 1,435
Likes: 371
Liked 129 Times in 59 Posts
Default Re: Rocker Clarification is up!!!

Thanks, Ron! That makes sense, I guess, although I still wonder why something wasn't said about the rocker arm ratio in the amended rules.


Lew
__________________
Lew Silverman #2070
"The Wagon Master" N/SA

Last edited by Lew Silverman; 01-21-2012 at 07:51 AM. Reason: Changed my mind!
Lew Silverman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2012, 11:42 AM   #9
Greg Reimer 7376
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Glendora,Calif.
Posts: 1,136
Likes: 172
Liked 705 Times in 219 Posts
Cool Re: Rocker Clarification is up!!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lew Silverman View Post
So if I show up with Harlan Sharp 1.7 roller rockers on my 327 I'm OK? Are they going to check the ratio?

Still a lot of "what if's"!

Lew
Some time back on another thread under the Tech section, we discussed push rod length and how to optimize it. Quite a lot of discussion resulted in the description of the desmodronic valvetrain commonly found in the various Kettering overhead valve engines. What it boiled down to in layman's language was that push rod length could affect rocker arm ratio.My 327 has a max allowable lift on the intakes of.390". That means that lobe length at the cam has to be .260" with a perfect 1.5 ratio rocker arm. We all know in the real world that nothing is ever perfect in consistant enough quantities to ever be counted on.The trick here is to have a valvetrain where the lobe lift is 2/3rds the valve lift. We discussed how a short pushrod with the same cam lift,rocker arm and lifter could result in a different lift at the valve than a long pushrod. The means for determining rocker arm ratios is to first determine valve lift at the retainer, as it's checked by NHRA,then divide that figure by the cam lobe lift, checked at the lifter,and it should verify the ACTUAL rocker arm ratio. With a roller tip rocker arm,some of the problems associated with OEM stamped arms vanish, but it will be interesting to see what new factors creep up as we start doing this.I am about to reassemble my 327 stocker motor soon, I'll compare results obtained with it as it goes together. I bought a new Dart block,had Gregg Luneack machine it and deck it, I'll soon see what possibly changed. The discussion we had on the Tech section a few months ago got so involved that before we were done, the various compilations of info resulted in a mini-textbook on push rod length. Fun reading!!
Greg Reimer 7376 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2012, 01:57 PM   #10
Reed Granrt
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Murfreesboro, Tn
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Re: Rocker Clarification is up!!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Greg Reimer 7376 View Post
Some time back on another thread under the Tech section, we discussed push rod length and how to optimize it. Quite a lot of discussion resulted in the description of the desmodronic valvetrain commonly found in the various Kettering overhead valve engines. What it boiled down to in layman's language was that push rod length could affect rocker arm ratio.My 327 has a max allowable lift on the intakes of.390". That means that lobe length at the cam has to be .260" with a perfect 1.5 ratio rocker arm. We all know in the real world that nothing is ever perfect in consistant enough quantities to ever be counted on.The trick here is to have a valvetrain where the lobe lift is 2/3rds the valve lift. We discussed how a short pushrod with the same cam lift,rocker arm and lifter could result in a different lift at the valve than a long pushrod. The means for determining rocker arm ratios is to first determine valve lift at the retainer, as it's checked by NHRA,then divide that figure by the cam lobe lift, checked at the lifter,and it should verify the ACTUAL rocker arm ratio. With a roller tip rocker arm,some of the problems associated with OEM stamped arms vanish, but it will be interesting to see what new factors creep up as we start doing this.I am about to reassemble my 327 stocker motor soon, I'll compare results obtained with it as it goes together. I bought a new Dart block,had Gregg Luneack machine it and deck it, I'll soon see what possibly changed. The discussion we had on the Tech section a few months ago got so involved that before we were done, the various compilations of info resulted in a mini-textbook on push rod length. Fun reading!!
Greg
I am playing with a couple of stocker motors at present and I am working with the cam grinder. In doing so I asked the cam grinder what ratio rocker did he develop the cam lobe around. He told me that in this case it was slightly less than the factory designed ratio because most will never be long. Almost all will be short on ratio. So I sat the rocker arm up upside down in the mill an used a laser beam to find my pivot point so that I could establish my pushrod "designed'" length. I then installed the cam between centers and plotted the area under curve. I then put the head on and lifter in with that rocker arm and using that laser determined pivot point, I adjusted a pushrod for my optimum lift. I then went thru the motion of determining area under the curve again and it followed area under the curve as a cam. Now I will move push rod lengths around a see area under the curve again and let you know what I find. But with the new rocker arm rule and the ability to make all rockers exactly the same correct ratio, I think we will see people adjusting pushrod more than ever just to get their lifts in spec and they may loose area under the curve as a result. My .02 worth
reed
Reed Granrt is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:29 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.