|
|
![]() |
#1 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Newport News, VA
Posts: 1,435
Likes: 371
Liked 129 Times in 59 Posts
|
![]()
I think they still need to add one line -
Aftermarket rocker arms must have same ratio as OEM for engine horsepower claimed or OEM or Aftermarket rocker arms with any ratio permitted I do like the new rule about being able to reinforce an OEM steel rocker arm! Lew
__________________
Lew Silverman #2070 "The Wagon Master" N/SA |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Glendora,Calif.
Posts: 1,136
Likes: 172
Liked 705 Times in 219 Posts
|
![]()
Anybody have a brand name and part number? It would be nice to see what we need to buy.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
__________________
67 Ford Fairlane F/SA 749 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,113
Likes: 1,571
Liked 1,821 Times in 413 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
As of just now, there is no rocker arm category listed.
__________________
Alan Roehrich 212A G/S |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Newport News, VA
Posts: 1,435
Likes: 371
Liked 129 Times in 59 Posts
|
![]()
So if I show up with Harlan Sharp 1.7 roller rockers on my 327 I'm OK? Are they going to check the ratio?
Still a lot of "what if's"! Lew
__________________
Lew Silverman #2070 "The Wagon Master" N/SA |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Lower Slower Delaware
Posts: 535
Likes: 22
Liked 269 Times in 99 Posts
|
![]()
Rocker Ratio is defined in your Engine Specifications in the guide.
__________________
Frank Ferrucci I/SA 1271 "Be Thankful for the Gifts You are Given" |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: cloquet mn
Posts: 466
Likes: 17
Liked 67 Times in 30 Posts
|
![]()
I spoke to Nhra tech last friday and was told stock ratio, dont know why its not
on the new ammendment. As pointed out earlier it is in the engine blueprints and probably why nothing has changed ratio wise. I was also told there will not be a accepted or required list, Any commercially available unit that fits the outlined requirements will be just fine.
__________________
Ron Mattson 5015 STK Last edited by ron mattson; 01-20-2012 at 10:39 AM. Reason: changes |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Newport News, VA
Posts: 1,435
Likes: 371
Liked 129 Times in 59 Posts
|
![]()
Thanks, Ron! That makes sense, I guess, although I still wonder why something wasn't said about the rocker arm ratio in the amended rules.
Lew
__________________
Lew Silverman #2070 "The Wagon Master" N/SA Last edited by Lew Silverman; 01-21-2012 at 07:51 AM. Reason: Changed my mind! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Glendora,Calif.
Posts: 1,136
Likes: 172
Liked 705 Times in 219 Posts
|
![]()
Some time back on another thread under the Tech section, we discussed push rod length and how to optimize it. Quite a lot of discussion resulted in the description of the desmodronic valvetrain commonly found in the various Kettering overhead valve engines. What it boiled down to in layman's language was that push rod length could affect rocker arm ratio.My 327 has a max allowable lift on the intakes of.390". That means that lobe length at the cam has to be .260" with a perfect 1.5 ratio rocker arm. We all know in the real world that nothing is ever perfect in consistant enough quantities to ever be counted on.The trick here is to have a valvetrain where the lobe lift is 2/3rds the valve lift. We discussed how a short pushrod with the same cam lift,rocker arm and lifter could result in a different lift at the valve than a long pushrod. The means for determining rocker arm ratios is to first determine valve lift at the retainer, as it's checked by NHRA,then divide that figure by the cam lobe lift, checked at the lifter,and it should verify the ACTUAL rocker arm ratio. With a roller tip rocker arm,some of the problems associated with OEM stamped arms vanish, but it will be interesting to see what new factors creep up as we start doing this.I am about to reassemble my 327 stocker motor soon, I'll compare results obtained with it as it goes together. I bought a new Dart block,had Gregg Luneack machine it and deck it, I'll soon see what possibly changed. The discussion we had on the Tech section a few months ago got so involved that before we were done, the various compilations of info resulted in a mini-textbook on push rod length. Fun reading!!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Murfreesboro, Tn
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
![]() Quote:
I am playing with a couple of stocker motors at present and I am working with the cam grinder. In doing so I asked the cam grinder what ratio rocker did he develop the cam lobe around. He told me that in this case it was slightly less than the factory designed ratio because most will never be long. Almost all will be short on ratio. So I sat the rocker arm up upside down in the mill an used a laser beam to find my pivot point so that I could establish my pushrod "designed'" length. I then installed the cam between centers and plotted the area under curve. I then put the head on and lifter in with that rocker arm and using that laser determined pivot point, I adjusted a pushrod for my optimum lift. I then went thru the motion of determining area under the curve again and it followed area under the curve as a cam. Now I will move push rod lengths around a see area under the curve again and let you know what I find. But with the new rocker arm rule and the ability to make all rockers exactly the same correct ratio, I think we will see people adjusting pushrod more than ever just to get their lifts in spec and they may loose area under the curve as a result. My .02 worth reed |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|