|
![]() |
#11 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Liberty City [East Texas]
Posts: 1,760
Likes: 5
Liked 99 Times in 60 Posts
|
![]()
It's a natural 8.5# car @ 405HP with aftermarket aluminum heads. That makes it a SS/F car. It can also run SS/E
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ck my math, is this correct? For SS/E at 405 HP [8 x 405 = 3240 + 170 = 3410 race weight] If my math is correct, in a perfect world I want to be lighter than that
__________________
Larry Woodfin 471W |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,111
Likes: 1,570
Liked 1,811 Times in 412 Posts
|
![]()
Larry, I spoke with a friend who would know about that combination, at length. He actually wanted to run a 70 Camaro to do it, and he already knows the engine and the stick shift set up. But he's already got another car.
You always WANT to be lighter, but you can't always get what you want. The 350 engine combinations in Super Stock aren't a lot different than the ones in Stock, well used and popular.
__________________
Alan Roehrich 212A G/S |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Tacoma, Washington
Posts: 1,632
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 5 Posts
|
![]()
Remember,, if you're building a Nova for Superstock,, with a good intake and some sort of spacer, you could have a clearance issue as there were no cowl hoods offered on them. We've got a racer out here facing the same issue with his Nova project. My 2 cents.
Danny Durham |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lower Dakota territory
Posts: 1,180
Likes: 1,074
Liked 799 Times in 236 Posts
|
![]()
Don't overlook the '68 327-325 motor in the Nova (manual trans non-GT combo). -Al
__________________
"That'll never work....." |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 20
Likes: 61
Liked 10 Times in 4 Posts
|
![]()
305 w/ 5spd would be a killer
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Langley (no igloos), British Columbia, Canada
Posts: 569
Likes: 309
Liked 284 Times in 87 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 | |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Avon, Indiana
Posts: 327
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Scott Wilcox 2193 3x National Champion SS/A, SS/B, SS/K, SS/L, SS/AM, A/SM, C/SM, B/A, C/A, G/A, H/A |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sand Springs, OK
Posts: 8,132
Likes: 896
Liked 390 Times in 170 Posts
|
![]()
The '96 LT4 Vette engine is absolutely a killer stick-only combo. That thing has been given a hp reduction, yet I could make some tuning adjustments in the computer and make more power at the tires on my chassis dyno than the original factory rating. Many virgin LT4 Vettes topped 330 at the tires. Add the 15% loss through the drivetrane........
__________________
Ed Wright 4156 SS/JA Last edited by Ed Wright; 05-09-2014 at 06:21 PM. Reason: Still can't type. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Tacoma, Washington
Posts: 1,632
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 5 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Danny Durham |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Tacoma, Washington
Posts: 1,632
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 5 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|