|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 26
Likes: 1
Liked 3 Times in 2 Posts
|
![]()
I have the chance to buy a 1989 Camaro 5.0L TBI with an auto. Looks like Its a natural O/SA car. Its a street car with no title and missing some interior parts, but I can buy it cheap.. Can this combo be competitive?
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#2 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Massapequa Park,NY
Posts: 1,282
Likes: 1,896
Liked 970 Times in 308 Posts
|
![]()
The cam and heads aren't the best. Better combo is the 1990 5.0 TPI rated at 241.Better heads and camshaft and intake manifold.
__________________
1989 Camaro Iroc-Z I/SA B&B Auto Machine Shop. Last edited by Glenn Briglio; 12-23-2020 at 02:51 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,493
Likes: 3,595
Liked 7,724 Times in 1,738 Posts
|
![]()
I almost built one of these. It's so bad on paper that it's the kind of thing that I would do. Small cam (which doesn't seem to matter, lots of small cam 305s going fast),weird intake runner and not-so-good intake manifold. It makes tons of torque in a street car. I think that Tom Reese ran this combo for a while but switched to PFI combo.
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS I'm not spending 100K to win 2K |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#4 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 26
Likes: 1
Liked 3 Times in 2 Posts
|
![]()
I wonder if the 6 cylinder would be better, or maybe even an earlier year with a carb instead of the TBI? PFI might be better, but harder to find this cheap..Guy only wants 600 bucks for a complete car.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,493
Likes: 3,595
Liked 7,724 Times in 1,738 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
For $600, I'd be buying the car anyway. Check the lower cowl and the rear frame and wheelwells for rust.
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS I'm not spending 100K to win 2K |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#6 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2018
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Liked 17 Times in 3 Posts
|
![]()
I’m attempting to complete a 6 cylinder project, but I’m concerned that I can’t get enough HP out of the cubic inches available. Basically I don’t know that I can get to 1.3 hp/cubic inch to mathematically get to the index. I would think it would be much easier to run a 302 V8 which is factored the same as my V6. They already have 30% more cubic inches, no mind the additional torque.. Either way I guess I’ll still be able to bracket race it on Saturday night..
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,815
Likes: 2,903
Liked 5,121 Times in 1,952 Posts
|
![]()
That thing will move a full sized Caprice with no problem.
I'm sure it will run under in P/SA. You have to maximize torque and then set the car up for it. (Small tri-y headers, etc.) You might want to invest in a dyno test so you can figure out the converter and gearing...unless you're really good at this ;-) Go for it...
__________________
"We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for." Will Rogers Last edited by Mark Yacavone; 12-23-2020 at 09:04 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#8 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 26
Likes: 1
Liked 3 Times in 2 Posts
|
![]()
So question, if its a natural O/SA car and you say it should run under in P.. is it safe to assume it will also run under in its natural class and its "Light" class?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,815
Likes: 2,903
Liked 5,121 Times in 1,952 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
O to P , a full pound break, thus 210 pounds for three tenths.
__________________
"We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for." Will Rogers |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#10 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Punta Gorda Isles, Fl.
Posts: 1,626
Likes: 3,404
Liked 779 Times in 209 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
If you need his phone number just let me know.
__________________
"Pistol" Pete Dutko |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|