HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-14-2013, 12:32 AM   #1
LethalRat
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Pa.
Posts: 52
Likes: 2
Liked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Default GT classes

Can you tell me what happened to the Super Stock GT classes. I saw some results and it looks like they let older body cars in it now. I don't race in Super Stock, i'm just a fan. I thought it was reserved for late model cars with early engines.
LethalRat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2013, 08:14 AM   #2
ss3011
Senior Member
 
ss3011's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Southeast Michigan
Posts: 909
Likes: 70
Liked 239 Times in 114 Posts
Default Re: GT classes

NHRA lifted the restriction that GT cars are 1980 and newer, and also allow any body style. Basically if the car is in the classification guide it is eligible for GT.
ss3011 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2013, 10:53 AM   #3
ALMACK
VIP Member
 
ALMACK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Bardstown, KY
Posts: 1,937
Likes: 131
Liked 369 Times in 127 Posts
Default Re: GT classes

Quote:
Originally Posted by ss3011 View Post
NHRA lifted the restriction that GT cars are 1980 and newer, and also allow any body style. Basically if the car is in the classification guide it is eligible for GT.
Nice.

When did NHRA do this ?
__________________
Alan Mackin Stock 3777/ SS 3377
P/SA & SS/PA Fox Thunderbird
I/PS '95 Mustang GT
ALMACK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2013, 11:02 AM   #4
Jeff Teuton
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Houma, LA
Posts: 2,717
Likes: 2
Liked 325 Times in 50 Posts
Default Re: GT classes

It was several years ago. We haviing been racing our 70 Duster in GT for at least 4 years now. And I think it was longer than that. GT is interesting in that motor for motor there is a .05 disadvantage to GT from pure SS, which is ok cause you kow when you go that is the rule. Might be some change shortly between FWD conversions and GT in original RWD cars in GT. I think we can all agree that the Cobalts (etc) have an advantage over the big rwd bodies with the same motor. But than again, I don't know if we can all agree on anything out here. Makes it interesting.
__________________
Jeff Teuton 4022 STK
Jeff Teuton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2013, 12:58 PM   #5
Michael Beard
VIP Member
 
Michael Beard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 4,060
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times in 9 Posts
Default Re: GT classes

My car is a 1980 Volare, so even prior to the rule change it had a lot of different classes it could potentially run.

One of the worst things I could've done... got to daydreaming and photoshopped up this Dodge Stratus, almost 600# lighter than the Volare. Will never be able to afford to build one, but if I ever win the lottery...! Driving Mike Volkman's Sebring got me hooked. That thing works nice, and really cuts through the air.

__________________
Michael Beard - NHRA/IHRA 3216 S/SS
Michael Beard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2013, 05:18 PM   #6
ALMACK
VIP Member
 
ALMACK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Bardstown, KY
Posts: 1,937
Likes: 131
Liked 369 Times in 127 Posts
Default Re: GT classes

Good to hear about the (any) body year change.

too bad it is v-8 only.
__________________
Alan Mackin Stock 3777/ SS 3377
P/SA & SS/PA Fox Thunderbird
I/PS '95 Mustang GT
ALMACK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2013, 05:58 PM   #7
Dick Butler
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Richmond Indiana
Posts: 1,196
Likes: 5
Liked 32 Times in 19 Posts
Default Re: GT classes

Gt index handicap versus SS is a very obvious one. Bigger problem is bogus Truck motors in GT/AA at rediculous HP advantage over true performance motors.
454 vette motor GT/AA 10.40s, 454 Truck motor in Cavalier 9.60s. Thats the motor not the chassis entirely. Once again a California combination which started the death of GT/AA racing. Small block fly wt. GT/AA are also an issue for heavy BB cars. Is it index, is it MASS to move in the BB car? A 7 and 7.5 lb GT class could separate the BB and SB cars as BB could take out wt and escape to 7 or 7.5 class.No escaping a Bogus motor though.
Dick Butler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2013, 07:50 PM   #8
Alan Roehrich
Veteran Member
 
Alan Roehrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,105
Likes: 1,561
Liked 1,789 Times in 408 Posts
Default Re: GT classes

When did they change the rule and allow big block engines in front wheel drive conversions?
__________________
Alan Roehrich
212A G/S
Alan Roehrich is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2013, 08:04 PM   #9
The Hawk
VIP Member
 
The Hawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Littleton,Colorado
Posts: 1,194
Likes: 0
Liked 249 Times in 109 Posts
Send a message via AIM to The Hawk
Default Re: GT classes

You guy`s with the budget,how `bout an `80 Fairmont with a late model Cobra Jet powerplant! Would be awesome!!!
__________________
Lane Weber

It`s Not What You Drive That Wins....It`s How You Drive It
The Hawk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2013, 08:28 PM   #10
Gordie Kissner
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Emmett, Idaho
Posts: 221
Likes: 1,312
Liked 18 Times in 10 Posts
Default Re: GT classes

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Hawk View Post
You guy`s with the budget,how `bout an `80 Fairmont with a late model Cobra Jet powerplant! Would be awesome!!!
I was thinking the same thing..only a late CJ powerplant in an early Maverick!
__________________
Gordie Kissner
SS 6010
STK 6010
Gordie Kissner is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:13 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.