HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock Tech
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-17-2012, 04:11 PM   #1
Tar Heel
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Pure Stock C5

Would a 2004 C5 be a natural B car allowing me to go as low as C/PS? If so I'm thinking it would have to weigh 340x10+170=3570. The index is 12.75. I just ran mine bone stock and it went 13.3 on the OEM tires and I even had our luggage in the trunk. I think with a CAI, converter, tune, and DOT drag radials I can drive to the track and run the number. Just wanted to make sure it would be a C/PS and the weight. It's my daily driver and I don't want to cut it up or make it "faster" than I need to in order to keep street manners.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2012, 04:21 PM   #2
Chad Rhodes
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Where the Green Grass Grows, AL
Posts: 2,375
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Default Re: Pure Stock C5

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tar Heel View Post
Would a 2004 C5 be a natural B car allowing me to go as low as C/PS? If so I'm thinking it would have to weigh 340x10+170=3570. The index is 12.75. I just ran mine bone stock and it went 13.3 on the OEM tires and I even had our luggage in the trunk. I think with a CAI, converter, tune, and DOT drag radials I can drive to the track and run the number. Just wanted to make sure it would be a C/PS and the weight. It's my daily driver and I don't want to cut it up or make it "faster" than I need to in order to keep street manners.
talk to Jeremy Preston with Horsepower Sales in South Florida 954-984-8040. He has competitively ran a C5 in NHRA stock for years and its a street driven car, the first one i believe was a daily driver even
__________________
Chad Rhodes 2113 I/SA
Chad Rhodes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2012, 12:13 PM   #3
ALMACK
VIP Member
 
ALMACK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Bardstown, KY
Posts: 1,935
Likes: 129
Liked 369 Times in 127 Posts
Default Re: Pure Stock C5

That 2004 is rated b@ 340 hp on NHRA's site. (not the Z06)

Not sure what the IHRA rating for PS is, but assuming it is the same, then your Vette's natural class is B at a 3060 lbs + 170 driver=3230 race weight.

C/PS class would be 3570 lbs with driver.
__________________
Alan Mackin Stock 3777/ SS 3377
P/SA & SS/PA Fox Thunderbird
I/PS '95 Mustang GT
ALMACK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2012, 12:32 PM   #4
Dan Fahey
VIP Member
 
Dan Fahey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,127
Likes: 1,084
Liked 184 Times in 113 Posts
Default Re: Pure Stock C5

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tar Heel View Post
Would a 2004 C5 be a natural B car allowing me to go as low as C/PS? If so I'm thinking it would have to weigh 340x10+170=3570. The index is 12.75. I just ran mine bone stock and it went 13.3 on the OEM tires and I even had our luggage in the trunk. I think with a CAI, converter, tune, and DOT drag radials I can drive to the track and run the number. Just wanted to make sure it would be a C/PS and the weight. It's my daily driver and I don't want to cut it up or make it "faster" than I need to in order to keep street manners.
Hey Tar Heal...

Sounds like a great combination and you can drive it to the track anywhere.

Saw one racer at Richmond with a C/PS LT1 Camaro that ran 3 tenths under in the Heat.

Dan
Dan Fahey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2012, 01:52 PM   #5
Tar Heel
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Pure Stock C5

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Fahey View Post
Hey Tar Heal...

Sounds like a great combination and you can drive it to the track anywhere.

Saw one racer at Richmond with a C/PS LT1 Camaro that ran 3 tenths under in the Heat.

Dan
Do you remember if it was street legal or an all-out racecar? Just curious ... For me to go 3 tenths under I'll have to do more than I planned but again, for now, just trying to run the 12.75 number and drive it to and from. I think this combination is fairly "soft" as with a completely dedicated racecar it should easily go a second under in Pure Stock.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2012, 04:34 PM   #6
Dan Fahey
VIP Member
 
Dan Fahey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,127
Likes: 1,084
Liked 184 Times in 113 Posts
Default Re: Pure Stock C5

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tar Heel View Post
Do you remember if it was street legal or an all-out racecar? Just curious ... For me to go 3 tenths under I'll have to do more than I planned but again, for now, just trying to run the 12.75 number and drive it to and from. I think this combination is fairly "soft" as with a completely dedicated racecar it should easily go a second under in Pure Stock.
That is what I do with my 95 SS. Helps to have a big huge trunk though.

Intake, Headers, 3600 Converter, 4.10's, DOT's, Suspension reinforcement if necessary, you should be going a 1/2 second under.

Mine has a Warren Engine which helps..and run .85 under in cool weather.

AS for the C/PS Camaro ..he Trailers it because it has Race Wheels and Tires.
Dan

Last edited by Dan Fahey; 05-23-2012 at 06:38 PM.
Dan Fahey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2012, 06:35 PM   #7
GTX JOHN
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Boulder City, Nevada 89005
Posts: 2,726
Likes: 2,775
Liked 2,450 Times in 692 Posts
Default Re: Pure Stock C5

My son has a 2002 Camaro Z28 (305 HP/LS1) Automatic. The ONLY mods are180 Stat,Early Hypertech Programmer, SLP Air Cleaner/Box 3.73 gears.

It runs 12.8 @110 at Sea Level in Summertime and is still under GM Extended Fact Warrantee.

It weighs around 3800 as raced ( 200 Lb. Kid/ 250 Lb. Dad)

Your Corvette is Several 100 Lbs. Lighter and has better Exhaust and some other Power Improvements ( I think).

My Stock 94 Vette ran 12.69 @ 111 at Sacramento in 1995 at Div 7Bracket Finals (Runner Up) Hypertech/160 Stat./KN/3.7 Gear.
At that time a 308 Lb. Driver and full tank of gas (Stock Goodyears). It was around 3500 with me in it I would guess and I understand
that the LT 1 is a bit slower than LS 1 Combo ( You GM guys could tell me ).

The gears in both Car made a HUGE Difference (Seven Tenths in Camaro with a 2.72 to 3.73 Ratio Change) but I think the gear
change is more difficult in the newer Vettes. My 2006 Ran 12.40s@ 113 at NHRA World Finals(2010) a couple years ago with a 2.59
gear and stock Goodyears, Gears and Drag Radials would make a Big Difference!!


If you change gears and engine is in decent shape you will be fast enough! E Mail me if you need more Info but Beware of my

GM Knowledge.................I am Mopar Guy and just bought my cars just to have the Extended Warrantees on my Bracket Cars.

HOPE this helps I do not Race Pure Stock (NHRA West Coast Boy).......The '94/'02 still get 22 MPH on road with 373 and OD auto!

Last edited by GTX JOHN; 05-18-2012 at 07:02 PM.
GTX JOHN is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:28 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.