|
![]() |
#1 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,168
Likes: 487
Liked 346 Times in 126 Posts
|
![]()
for a stocker motor or are they just for a standard rebuild?
Thanks Dave |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Probably too heavy.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Sulphur Springs Texas
Posts: 743
Likes: 146
Liked 166 Times in 46 Posts
|
![]()
David,
What kind of engine? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,168
Likes: 487
Liked 346 Times in 126 Posts
|
![]()
Thanks for the reply Jim, its going to be a 1975 350 chevy nova in I/SA. The long term goal is to hand it over to my nephew who is now 14 and I will return to racing my Duster. I want to keep him on the straight and narrow and the drag strip and the people there are the perfect examples for him
I think we met long ago in Houston. I was with Jeff Ferguson and Mike Maryonne. Last edited by David Lee; 10-21-2007 at 05:11 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Detroit
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
TRW pistons work great for LEGAL stocker engines.
__________________
Louis Jeffery 3225 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Charlotte, MI
Posts: 127
Likes: 3
Liked 5 Times in 3 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
I ran one of those motors for years and I will just say there are better choices. I used the TRW pistons for a while, and they used to be much nicer to the wallet but they have some issues. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,168
Likes: 487
Liked 346 Times in 126 Posts
|
![]()
Can you expain what the issues are. I am not planning on a killer motor, that will come later. In the beginning it will be a bracket car and got to 3 or four div a year if I am lucky.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Charlotte, MI
Posts: 127
Likes: 3
Liked 5 Times in 3 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Sulphur Springs Texas
Posts: 743
Likes: 146
Liked 166 Times in 46 Posts
|
![]()
Hey David,
Sorry it took me so long to get back on here. Like some of the other guys have already said, there are a lot better choices out there than the TRW stuff. The machine work in the ring land area is not that good and they are tough on the cylinder walls IMO. Good Luck, and I do remember meeting you at Houston or Baton Rouge. Jim |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Anthem, Arizona
Posts: 2,766
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
![]()
There was a time when TRW pistons were affordable and there was little else to offer. Considering the cost of a new set today, those offered by CP, Ross, etc. are not only vastly superior in technology and quality, but the cost difference is negligible. Remember, ring seal and reducing friction is key to a fast engine. Both are difficult (but not impossible) with a inferior piston.
But if you have an old set laying around and just need to get it running on a tight budget, then go ahead. Have somebody prepare a high quality set of rings that are gapped, thinner with spacers and back-cut. Vertical clearance is important and can be adjusted with spacers. But you will not obtain the machining tolerance on the lands as offered by the other race piston manufacturers. Not out of the box anyways.
__________________
Jeff Lee 7494 D/S '70 AMX |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|