CLASS RACER FORUM

CLASS RACER FORUM (https://classracer.com/classforum/index.php)
-   Stock and Super Stock Tech (https://classracer.com/classforum/forumdisplay.php?f=4)
-   -   69 camaro front suspension (https://classracer.com/classforum/showthread.php?t=64273)

Camarob859 11-07-2016 06:45 PM

69 camaro front suspension
 
Hi all
I've got some troubles with my camaro wondering what you guys have done to correct, the front tires when lifted off the ground are "towed in" 1 3/4" square on the ground also what can be done about the camber change with no load?

Ed Wright 11-08-2016 06:47 PM

Re: 69 camaro front suspension
 
No answer so far, so last '69 Camaro I had, I heated the arms at the spindles to make the outer tie rods level at mid-travel. This was back in the 1970s, so I don't remember if the ends had to go up or down.

Rod Greene 11-08-2016 06:57 PM

Re: 69 camaro front suspension
 
"This was back in the 1070s," Some of us have around a long time!

Seriously though, the Mopar Chassis Manual had a section on correcting bump steer. That could possibly help.

MR DERBY CITY 11-08-2016 07:09 PM

Re: 69 camaro front suspension
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Ed Wright (Post 519306)
No answer so far, so last '69 Camaro I had, I heated the arms at the spindals to make the outer tie rods level at mid-travel. This was back in the 1070s, so I don't remember if the ends had to go up or down.

1070's....Damn Ed, you are older than I thought....you were already OLD when you ran junior stock.....LOL......

Ed Wright 11-08-2016 07:43 PM

Re: 69 camaro front suspension
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by MR DERBY CITY (Post 519310)
1070's....Damn Ed, you are older than I thought....you were already OLD when you ran junior stock.....LOL......

Just thought about that, that Camaro was in the mid 1980s. Sorry.
And, I just turned 73 this past Monday.

J&S Racing 11-08-2016 08:38 PM

Re: 69 camaro front suspension
 
Either Sphon or speeteck sells a bump steer kit. They use a heim joint for the outer tie rod with shims to get them level as possible. These ARE legal in stock!

Might want to take a look at the Global West offset shafts, not sure if they would help your problem.

George Mirza 11-08-2016 10:42 PM

Re: 69 camaro front suspension
 
Sounds like a bump steer kit will solve most of your problem. Speedway sells all the parts to make one. They may even have a kit for a 1st gen Camaro. I put one together for my Duster and it worked out very well. They make a threaded stud that replaces the tie rod end, a couple of hiem joints and the right length threaded tube and your good to go.

Mark70Nova 11-08-2016 10:56 PM

Re: 69 camaro front suspension
 
Baer brakes sells a nice bump steer kit that I have used numerous times, I like the tapered stud they give you that goes into the steering arm instead of just a standard bolt like a lot of them have. It doesn't completely eliminate bump steer but it reduces it to almost nothing.

SDT1DYI 11-09-2016 12:55 PM

Re: 69 camaro front suspension
 
You may want to look at an upper ball joint extension, which changes the arc the upper A arm travel in relationship to the lower A arm.. It will change toe in, depending on where you adjust the upper A arm travel stop. The Coil spring height will as well change the static height of the upper A arm and the travel distance. Try running as much positive Caster as possible, 4- 5 degrees , it should help at speed down track .

SDT1DYI 11-09-2016 08:42 PM

Re: 69 camaro front suspension
 
One other issue to be carefully with I forgot to mention with increasing suspension travel with extend upper ball joints, make sure you check that you don't exceed the travel limits of the shocks.

chris ok 11-09-2016 09:44 PM

Re: 69 camaro front suspension
 
I did just that. I added tall ball joints up top. Pro forged. They helped with bump steer big time. Now have too much suspension travel. One repair makes another necessary. Is there a suspension limiter for these cars?
As the tall ball joint helped bump steer and really helped positive camber too.

SDT1DYI 11-10-2016 05:34 PM

Re: 69 camaro front suspension
 
You should consider installing a 4"-6" long, ( as necessary ) 5/8" NC B-7 alloy all stud in the top Arm frame. Mill two flats in top end of the stud to fit an open end wrench size you want to use to allow turning the stud.
Position the stud in the upper A frame to allow the bottom of it to contact the frame pad correctly. TIG weld a 5/8" NC heavy pattern nut to the upper A frame. Use a 5/8" NC jam nut on the stud.
Adjust the Stud so it makes contact with the frame pad before the shock travel is fully extended. Lock the jam nut down. This then is max travel position.
Then adjust the stud clockwise to limit the travel more ( log and track the number of turns you use ) when you do not need the car to rotate as much at a track where the starting line is in good condition.

Reaction time and 60ft times will improve some then

Hope all of this helps you.

CrateCamaro 11-11-2016 03:03 AM

Re: 69 camaro front suspension
 
I dont use any fancy tall ball joints...never heated any components to reshape and i have great bump steer with less then 3/8 toe in or out throughout the complete travel. Sounds too me like there isnt enough caster in the car to be honest. My tie rods are completely level at ride height, nose in the weeds with less then a 1/2 inch between the lower bump stop and frame with 6 1/2 inches of upward travel and the toe is set to 1/16 in at ride height. Id make sure noone has put a cheap set of drop spindles on the car previously or maybe something is bent? Id be looking at the alignment before i changed anything. 1/16 to an 1/8 toe in with as much positive caster as possible to start. I still have the original 68 control arms loaded with global west bushings...moog replacement steering components and Afco low friction ball joints with moroso springs.

Terry Cain 11-11-2016 05:27 AM

Re: 69 camaro front suspension
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by SDT1DYI (Post 519458)
You should consider installing a 4"-6" long, ( as necessary ) 5/8" NC B-7 alloy all stud in the top Arm frame. Mill two flats in top end of the stud to fit an open end wrench size you want to use to allow turning the stud.
Position the stud in the upper A frame to allow the bottom of it to contact the frame pad correctly. TIG weld a 5/8" NC heavy pattern nut to the upper A frame. Use a 5/8" NC jam nut on the stud.
Adjust the Stud so it makes contact with the frame pad before the shock travel is fully extended. Lock the jam nut down. This then is max travel position.
Then adjust the stud clockwise to limit the travel more ( log and track the number of turns you use ) when you do not need the car to rotate as much at a track where the starting line is in good condition.

Reaction time and 60ft times will improve some then

Hope all of this helps you.

NOT LEGAL in Stock.

Alan Nyhus 11-11-2016 10:18 AM

Re: 69 camaro front suspension
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by chris ok (Post 519402)
I did just that. I added tall ball joints up top. Pro forged. Now have too much suspension travel. One repair makes another necessary. Is there a suspension limiter for these cars?

Use these in the upper control arms in place of the factory rubber bumpers. You can trim them and/or add washers to adjust how tall they are. Replacing the supplied self locking nuts with a serrated flange nut makes changing them a bunch easier.

http://www.jegs.com/i/JEGS-Performan...61860/10002/-1

http://www.jegs.com/i/JEGS-Performan...61861/10002/-1

Run to Rund 11-12-2016 12:21 PM

Re: 69 camaro front suspension
 
In the 1970s (I'm also old!) I plotted toe-in vs. inches of lift and found that the last couple inches of lift caused the big increases in toe-in. The no-dollar solution was to lower the front and use snubbers under the upper A arms that were thick enough to prevent those last couple inches. I could still get about 5-6" of travel, iirc.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:06 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.