HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock Tech
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-17-2021, 05:53 PM   #11
SSDiv6
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Glendale, Arizona
Posts: 2,991
Likes: 693
Liked 1,457 Times in 543 Posts
Default Re: Weight transfer

Quote:
Originally Posted by devo340 View Post
Would you say most Stockers are 50/50 or better?
Nope. There are many running running 52% ~ 56% at the nose.
SSDiv6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2021, 06:19 PM   #12
SSDiv6
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Glendale, Arizona
Posts: 2,991
Likes: 693
Liked 1,457 Times in 543 Posts
Default Re: Weight transfer

The weight location depends a lot on the wheel base, engine location and the type of suspension on the car. I always suggest if you have the chance and the opportunity to do so, start by putting the car on the scales.

I also recommend Wayne Scraba's, Darin Morgan's, Rick Jones and/or Jerry Bickel's books on drag racing suspensions and learn the basics of the dynamics and vectors that take place on the suspension.

https://www.amazon.com/Build-Winning.../dp/1557884625

https://www.summitracing.com/parts/pow-pow901020

https://quartermax.com/the-rick-jone...-tuning-guide/

https://www.jerrybickel.com/complete...ce-manual.html

I lost count of how many cars I see going down the track porpoising (moving up and down like a Porpoise on the water) because they have put lots of weight behind and/or on top of the rear end making the suspension to unload while driving down the the track. ...or, cars going down the track with the nose up in the air like a lowrider.

You may have a nice weight transfer and wheelstand, but then you give up any gains going down the track by not having a rake angle. Let's not forget its effect on the roll center and pitching of the car the slamming on the brakes.
SSDiv6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Liked
Old 06-17-2021, 06:26 PM   #13
SSDiv6
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Glendale, Arizona
Posts: 2,991
Likes: 693
Liked 1,457 Times in 543 Posts
Default Re: Weight transfer

...also, there are some members on this Forum that are very well versed on the dynamics of suspensions and they do it for a living such as Marty Rinehart, Phil Mandella, Randy Mans, Mark Markow and others that may be able to answer questions if they are not busy and available.

Last edited by SSDiv6; 06-17-2021 at 07:56 PM.
SSDiv6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2021, 06:37 PM   #14
Adger Smith
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Texarkana Ark/TX
Posts: 2,348
Likes: 434
Liked 677 Times in 261 Posts
Default Re: Weight transfer

How about weight at the cross member and the engine moved forward, even though some classes get an allowable setback
__________________
Adger Smith (Former SS)
Adger Smith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2021, 08:43 PM   #15
GTX JOHN
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Boulder City, Nevada 89005
Posts: 2,530
Likes: 2,222
Liked 1,809 Times in 572 Posts
Default Re: Weight transfer

Quote:
Originally Posted by SSDiv6 View Post
Nope. There are many running running 52% ~ 56% at the nose.
NON of our cars are 50/50 except the Wagon
when you remove all the ballast = AND there is
usually a whole bunch of that.
__________________
John Irving
741 Stock
741 Super Stock
GTX JOHN is offline   Reply With Quote
Liked
Old 06-18-2021, 12:02 AM   #16
SSDiv6
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Glendale, Arizona
Posts: 2,991
Likes: 693
Liked 1,457 Times in 543 Posts
Default Re: Weight transfer

Quote:
Originally Posted by Adger Smith View Post
How about weight at the cross member and the engine moved forward, even though some classes get an allowable setback
FWD conversion cars in SS/GT and Super Modified, as required by the on the rule book, have specific limits on the location and placement of the engine.
SSDiv6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2021, 07:35 AM   #17
Dwight Southerland
VIP Member
 
Dwight Southerland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Arkansas - In the middle of everything.
Posts: 1,980
Likes: 53
Liked 724 Times in 177 Posts
Default Re: Weight transfer

Quote:
Originally Posted by devo340 View Post
Would you say most Stockers are 50/50 or better?
No.
__________________
Dwight Southerland is offline   Reply With Quote
Liked
Old 06-19-2021, 10:30 PM   #18
e vassar
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 354
Likes: 62
Liked 238 Times in 93 Posts
Default Re: Weight transfer

Quote:
Originally Posted by SSDiv6 View Post
Except, if you know what you are doing, you don't put weight over the rear wheels...
3-speed trans don't have anything to do with wheel stands either. There are lots of cars out there with a powerglide that will drag the bumper during the launch.
Really? Sure we've all seen cars with powerglides doing impressive wheelies but there's no way you're going to convince me that a 1:76 or 1:82 first gear would work better than a 2:52 . As far as the weight......unless the laws of physics have changed...adding weight to the back is better than adding weight to the front
e vassar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2021, 04:05 AM   #19
black88coupe
Member
 
black88coupe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 352
Likes: 18
Liked 19 Times in 12 Posts
Default Re: Weight transfer

Physics. Get the car setup right and it will work well. All the power in the world won’t help if the car isn’t setup right. My car pulls the front wheels and I have a grand total of $600 invested in my shortblock and heads. Plus I’m running an AOD trans which has a horrible 1st gear ratio. Spend your money and time on perfecting your chassis setup.

__________________
Mitch Beri- The Motor City
1985 GT- “Stock-ish” 5.0 motor, AOD/ trans brake. 12.68 @ 101.31mph.
https://www.facebook.com/groups/FOXBODYFLEAMARKET/
black88coupe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2021, 10:35 AM   #20
SSDiv6
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Glendale, Arizona
Posts: 2,991
Likes: 693
Liked 1,457 Times in 543 Posts
Default Re: Weight transfer

Quote:
Originally Posted by e vassar View Post
Really? Sure we've all seen cars with powerglides doing impressive wheelies but there's no way you're going to convince me that a 1:76 or 1:82 first gear would work better than a 2:52 . As far as the weight......unless the laws of physics have changed...adding weight to the back is better than adding weight to the front
The problem of many is the lack of understanding of physics.
Physics is more that the laws of leverage or fulcrum and that is were many miss it. The center of gravity of the car has to be considered the same as many other factors. Just because a car has a very high wheelstand, it does not mean the car is fast.

One item people have to understand the concept of wheel speed. Hitting the tires hard on the launch, you hurt the wheel speed.

About transmission 1st gear ratios, the selection depends on the engine powerband. You have to optimize the recovery of the engine Going from a 2.52 gear ration to a 1.00 high gear ratio, due to the RPM drop, is not for all engines. You also optimize the launch with the rear end ratio and torque converter flash and lock RPM's.

By the way, I wrench a Stock Eliminator small block car has does pull the wheels off the ground, carries them without losing wheel speed and the 60's are better than many of the big block cars in the class in the mid 1.30's. None of the weight is on top or behind the axle. I also wrench a Comp Eliminator Super Modified car that has all the weight ahead of the rear axle and 60's are in the low 1.10's and I know that at the right track it will got high 1.0's.
SSDiv6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:16 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.