Accusump - pros & cons

[Barry Polley]

Originally Posted by 1320racer

\why, what issue do you have that you are trying to bandaid?

Didn’t you just scatter your Pontiac motor all over the track? , yes we have pics..
Maybe an Accusump could have helped you?

You aren’t racing stock or Superstock so stop with your agenda..

You were tossed off YB! Wow!
You were tossed off DRR
Three strikes??

[1320racer]

You chose to insert yourself in this thread, NOT to offer your opinion on the pros and cons of using an accusump, but rather to attack me.

Originally Posted by Barry Polley

Didn’t you just scatter your Pontiac motor all over the track? , yes we have pics..
Maybe an Accusump could have helped you?

You aren’t racing stock or Superstock so stop with your agenda..

You were tossed off YB! Wow!
You were tossed off DRR
Three strikes??

you and a few others replying here are no victims, only willing participants!!

[SS3860]

I choose not to use an accusump just because I don't want all the lines and fittings with possible leaks. Currently running E/SA 71 Camaro 350/330 combo. Runs 80 to 85 under in bracket mode. Fast cars in my class LS1 GTO's run 1.30+ under. Don't believe an accusump will get me a half second. I'll just stick with 5 quarts in the pan. If I need a 10th I'll drop a quart and ice the intake. But otherwise I'll race the shoe polish.

Tom Flowers
3860 E/SA

[Rick J]

Originally Posted by J.R. Haddad

I'm thinking of installing an accusump on my LS motor. When I do things
like this, I always find out why I shouldn't have done it, after I've done
it. Would like some real world opinions from "people with experience
in dealing with accusump type of installations".

Thanks,

J.R.

Odd thing is..... E.D. 1320 does not race stock or super stock, does not race a LS based engine, does not use an accumulator....
Why would he even comment here at all?

[1320racer]

Because I can and for the same reasons others have replied here who do not check all your boxes no mind you who only replied to comment about me!