|
![]() |
#31 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: NS CANADA
Posts: 850
Likes: 1,353
Liked 332 Times in 128 Posts
|
![]()
Certainly more qualified than me! I have a bunch of pictures i have to resize then i?ll post but be ready to be not impressed, lol.
Learning a lot following threads like this!
__________________
Jim Miller 103 U/SA |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#32 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Belmont N.S. Canada
Posts: 473
Likes: 246
Liked 166 Times in 71 Posts
|
![]()
This is the combo I use in my Chevelle. I?ve been working it at a few years and have it down to 330 in that body with automatic. I believe it?s 335-340 in Camaro/nova still
__________________
Chris Chapman 1969 Chevelle NHRA F-G/SA 1090 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#33 |
Live Reporter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hickory, Ky
Posts: 10,598
Likes: 1,889
Liked 10,625 Times in 2,198 Posts
|
![]()
Lots of ways to go fast!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#34 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Colorado Springs Colorado/Thousand Oaks Ca
Posts: 656
Likes: 82
Liked 368 Times in 129 Posts
|
![]()
Ok- so I finished the heads and started looking at the short block. The original plan was to run the reworked heads on the short block as delivered, but I wasn't happy with the short block and have started the rebuild on that. The dyno sheets I received with the engine showed a best of 441 HP I believe, I can post them if anyones interested, which sounds just right considering what the car ran. So what I found when the pan came off was stock GM rods with NHRA legal pistons with a standard ring pack, quite a bit of drag, the block was filled, .009 piston to wall clearance, a GM big truck pan with a crank scraper and a full length windage tray. Compression was way low considering what's allowed, probably 1/2 of a point, and then the offset head dowel pins and the butchered intake that goes along with that. On a good note the engine had an aluminum hub ATI balancer. So maybe we can get a nice performance gain, so I will go though the short block and get it together and run it on the dyno, then track test it in my F/SA Chevelle, and all by the time the air changes this fall.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#35 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Colorado Springs Colorado/Thousand Oaks Ca
Posts: 656
Likes: 82
Liked 368 Times in 129 Posts
|
![]()
The line hone is done, next the block will be decked, then TQ plate honed to .069 over.
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#36 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Colorado Springs Colorado/Thousand Oaks Ca
Posts: 656
Likes: 82
Liked 368 Times in 129 Posts
|
![]()
Done and ready to dyno.
Last edited by HP HUNTER; 09-13-2024 at 05:47 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#37 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Monroe Twsp, NJ
Posts: 191
Likes: 260
Liked 346 Times in 78 Posts
|
![]()
When does it go on the dyno? Good read!
__________________
Pat Clemente #1427 B/S |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#38 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Colorado Springs Colorado/Thousand Oaks Ca
Posts: 656
Likes: 82
Liked 368 Times in 129 Posts
|
![]()
It's been to the dyno, the results were 486 HP @ 6300 RPM, up from 441 HP when I received the engine. When I went through the engine I tried to use as many of the original parts that came with the engine as possible. Its definitely down on power, and I believe this is due to the cam, I checked the lobe lift before I assembled the engine, which was where it should be, but what I didn't do is check the profile, which I believe does not have the duration it should, the cam and lifters looked good, but I think it knocked the corners of the lobes off, prior to my build. So from here it will get a steel cam with coated tool steel lifters.
Last edited by HP HUNTER; 10-03-2024 at 01:40 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|