|
03-25-2023, 11:36 AM | #1 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Glendora,Calif.
Posts: 1,109
Likes: 164
Liked 645 Times in 206 Posts
|
Tech question--
If I took my '70 Monte Carlo and wanted to race it in Stock, would it be against the rule book to remove the front disc brakes on it and replace them with from drums from a Chevelle? I think the discs were standard equipment back then on the MC, but the Chevelle still had standard front drums until 1972.
|
03-25-2023, 03:02 PM | #2 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,094
Likes: 398
Liked 246 Times in 99 Posts
|
Re: Tech question--
Quote:
i would give tech a call, but i can not see a reason why you could not. |
|
Liked |
03-25-2023, 07:17 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Fulton County, PA
Posts: 529
Likes: 9
Liked 734 Times in 204 Posts
|
Re: Tech question--
Rulebook says "Must be equipped with stock production four-wheel hydraulic
brake system, or aftermarket disc brakes" Sounds like to the letter of the rule, if you remove the OE brakes, you must install aftermarket discs. The next obvious question would be, why? |
03-25-2023, 07:46 PM | #4 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: Martinsburg, WV.
Posts: 8
Likes: 1
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
Re: Tech question--
Greg, I don't know your reason for wanting to switch your disc. to drums, but if it is to get rid of some weight be careful. Many years ago I had a 69 Chevy 2 with factory disc. on the front & was told I could get rid of 40 lbs. going to the drums. Had a friend with a Camaro with front drums, we made a trade I even did all of the work, well the only thing that I lost was time & alot of braking power. I weighed the parts as I was making the switch, the weight difference was nothing, but a deal is a deal & he was a happy camper. My car ran low 10's 130 mph. & it was hard to stop after that switch. Danny
|
Liked |
03-25-2023, 08:41 PM | #5 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,414
Likes: 2,579
Liked 4,447 Times in 1,693 Posts
|
Re: Tech question--
Should be a bit lighter, from my experience..
Also ,less drag Plus, it's easier to heat and bend the drum brake steering arms for toe-in issues. Greg, Just do it..Nobody cares (except for maybe a few keyboard racers)
__________________
We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for..... Will Rogers |
Liked |
03-25-2023, 11:00 PM | #6 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Glendora,Calif.
Posts: 1,109
Likes: 164
Liked 645 Times in 206 Posts
|
Re: Tech question--
One thing about this whole deal, the discs were all power assist with the big round booster on the fitrwall. Drums either came power or manual. Running a vacuum booster with any kind of performance camshaft would absolutely not work,especially a Stock Eliminator type cam. That would be a weight saver as well.
|
Liked |
03-26-2023, 10:51 AM | #7 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: from Vancouver BC Canada, now in Nova Scotia
Posts: 1,257
Likes: 244
Liked 937 Times in 258 Posts
|
Re: Tech question--
Prior to NHRA allowing lightweight, aftermarket disc brakes, many racers s swapped out the factory disc brakes for manual drums. As Mark said, less weight, and could be adjusted for zero drag. Funny, how, when many of the fast, higher classed cars, that had replaced the factory discs, for drums (and often to very light, small, 6 cylinder drum brakes), started lobbying for "Better" (read that as even lighter) aftermarket brakes, it became all about safety. Kinda like when lightweight racing seats were requested , again for "Safety". Have to wonder how many racers would have installed the aftermarket seats if they had to be the same weight as the seats being replaced, or heavier. I would guess "safety" would not have be as much of a concern in that case! As for the drum brakes, my buddys SS/F 66 Chevelle ran 9.7s at 138 MPH, on the stock 9 1/2" drum brakes, and another buddys 67 Mustang bracket car ran the same numbers with the original 10" drums. Neither had stopping issues, despite both being stick cars that went into neutral at the finish line, so no engine braking. Of course that also depends on the shut down length of the tracks being raced on. Cold drum brakes also often hold the car in the burnout box better than some manual disc brakes as well.
__________________
NHRA 6390 STK M/S 85 Mustang |
Liked |
03-26-2023, 10:20 PM | #8 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 45
Likes: 2
Liked 14 Times in 9 Posts
|
Re: Tech question--
My dads 68 chevelle c/s 3680 pound car had drum brakes on it .at phoenix he could barely get it stopped at the turn off we had to put new shoes on it every race because they would get cracks in the pads on the shoe.go with disc brakes stock or after market. much safer .unstead of push and pray you stop.
|
Liked |
03-26-2023, 11:38 PM | #9 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Whitecourt,Alberta,Canada
Posts: 226
Likes: 3,759
Liked 41 Times in 24 Posts
|
Re: Tech question--
My ex-modified eliminator camaro has drum brakes up front. With times of high 9's to low 10's and speeds of 130s it was a bear to stop.
__________________
Bruce Cameron 68 Nova 396 E/S 68 Camaro SS/? ex Checkmate Modified |
03-27-2023, 07:26 AM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 574
Likes: 6
Liked 44 Times in 22 Posts
|
Re: Tech question--
If you go from power to manual brakes, remember to include a retainer so the pushrod cannot fall out of the master cylinder cup.
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|