Acid

[Signman]

Originally Posted by Billy Nees

A long, long time ago a very wise man told me,"Billy, Stock Eliminator is a Gentleman's Club. Everybody's cheating. Just as long as it doesn't get out-of-hand".

One told me right at my start in Stock: "STOCK IS NOT STOCK!!"

[SSDiv6]

With the allowance of aftermarket cylinder heads, better valves, any valve job/angle, and tooling marks in the throat no need for it.

[nickh]

Back in the 80's we used it on a circle dirt track motor, we never got caught using it.

Plus I tripped a little on it back in the 70's LOL

[Tom Meyer]

Back in the day when they started to let super stock port, some cars went the same others went faster. Some Pro Stock cars were fast and winning races and then went slow. Some racers work there butts off spending time and money and effort, one will take short cuts to go fast, but they are all called cheaters. There are so many well respected racers on this site and to slam them when you come on here just to try to stir stuff up with your no name rants, it will not get or garner any respect for yourself. Tom

[1347]

Originally Posted by CarTunesan

Thanks for a decent answer !, so the bastardized blaster is the way to go now for the purest?

Is that what you consider yourself? a purist?

[CarTunesan]

Originally Posted by 1347

Is that what you consider yourself? a purist?

Can i get my money back on the rulebook I bought , it’s pretty clear on heads, but apparently everyone gets upset to ask a real question , the one joker said I slammed somebody , I don’t know where he came up with that conclusion , best regards , no wonder we can’t get any new one in the sport, imo,

[J.R. Haddad]

Listen 'Toon, if you are interested in a set of heads, why not contact
someone who has a reputation for building Fast Stocker Heads.
You come on here with a no-name handle, wanting information
that may or may not be available, and if it is available, I imagine like
most work on precision racing engine, it would be expensive. Then,
after asking questions where you want possible free information,
hiding behind a Cartoon, you slam people for not playing your game.
You say you have a rulebook, good. Now go build yourself a Stocker.
J.R.

[CarTunesan]

Originally Posted by J.R. Haddad

Listen 'Toon, if you are interested in a set of heads, why not contact
someone who has a reputation for building Fast Stocker Heads.
You come on here with a no-name handle, wanting information
that may or may not be available, and if it is available, I imagine like
most work on precision racing engine, it would be expensive. Then,
after asking questions where you want possible free information,
hiding behind a Cartoon, you slam people for not playing your game.
You say you have a rulebook, good. Now go build yourself a Stocker.
J.R.

Show me where i slammed someone?, according to the rulebook , you can’t do anything to the heads, so i got plenty , why so angry , no wonder people don’t but their name on here !show me where i got out of line with the good ol boy club ?

[Billy Nees]

Originally Posted by CarTunesan

according to the rulebook , you can’t do anything to the heads

So it seems to me that if you can't or won't "acid" a set of heads then build a combo which won't respond to "acided" heads. As long as NHRA is not going to respond to them, people are going to use them!

[CarTunesan]

Originally Posted by Billy Nees

So it seems to me that if you can't or won't "acid" a set of heads then build a combo which won't respond to "acided" heads. As long as NHRA is not going to respond to them, people are going to use them!

I see other ones on here getting crucified for cheating and not following the rulebook , then almost everyone says ignore the section on stock heads , , thanks for not ripping me a new one like some are trying to do , lol ,