HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Nostalgia Stock and Super Stock
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-03-2021, 10:09 AM   #181
oldskool
VIP Member
 
oldskool's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: The Land of Bayous, Boudin & Crawfish
Posts: 1,668
Likes: 223
Liked 750 Times in 361 Posts
Default Re: Project - NHRA Stock and S/S results 61-68

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rat Patrol View Post
OK, re the Ben Wolfe car - can you both give me your ‘best guess’..and why ( meets class, correct year etc) .......I kinda got lost in the discussion -


if pontiac, was bird, imo
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	1 - Weidner '68 B-SA .jpg
Views:	106
Size:	497.1 KB
ID:	61086   Click image for larger version

Name:	2 - Hatari '69 B-SA .jpg
Views:	102
Size:	726.6 KB
ID:	61087  

Last edited by oldskool; 11-03-2021 at 10:44 AM.
oldskool is offline   Reply With Quote
Liked
Old 11-03-2021, 11:10 AM   #182
DeuceCoupe
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 267
Likes: 96
Liked 45 Times in 41 Posts
Default Re: Project - NHRA Stock and S/S results 61-68

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rat Patrol View Post
OK, re the Ben Wolfe car - can you both give me your ‘best guess’..and why ( meets class, correct year etc) .......I kinda got lost in the discussion -
I thought of a RA4 factored up past its 380hp factoring circa 1970 but that doesnt work because other cars show the RA4 was factored at 380hp since it hit the strip in early 1969.

So the only possible Pontiac that fits is a 68 Bird RA2, factored to 390hp.
I have no basis for that factor other than it makes the car fit.
3300/390=8.46
Any factor less than 390hp will knock the car down into C/SA=8.50 class.

Why would the RA2 be factored to 390hp when the RA4 was only factored at 380hp? Hard to explain.

So if we have to guess a Pontiac, its either a 68 Bird RA2 factored at 390hp or maybe a RA5? LOL but we're getting desperate here.

Or it was a 67 Comet 427/410 and somebody thought it was a Pontiac?
DeuceCoupe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2021, 11:24 AM   #183
Stan Weiss
Senior Member
 
Stan Weiss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Phila, PA
Posts: 607
Likes: 0
Liked 545 Times in 291 Posts
Default Re: Project - NHRA Stock and S/S results 61-68

Quote:
Originally Posted by DeuceCoupe View Post
I thought of a RA4 factored up past its 380hp factoring circa 1970 but that doesnt work because other cars show the RA4 was factored at 380hp since it hit the strip in early 1969.

So the only possible Pontiac that fits is a 68 Bird RA2, factored to 390hp.
I have no basis for that factor other than it makes the car fit.
3300/390=8.46

Any factor less than 390hp will knock the car down into C/SA=8.50 class.

Why would the RA2 be factored to 390hp when the RA4 was only factored at 380hp? Hard to explain.

So if we have to guess a Pontiac, its either a 68 Bird RA2 factored at 390hp or maybe a RA5? LOL but we're getting desperate here.

Or it was a 67 Comet 427/410 and somebody thought it was a Pontiac?

Lets say that was the case. Would someone really build a car for that class @ 8.46? I don't think so. IMO that looks like someone built a car for the 8.50 class and ran really good and got HP that moved them up a class.

Stan


PS the RAV was a small displacement engine for Trans AM like the Z28. I don't think enough were built for it to be NHRA legal.

Last edited by Stan Weiss; 11-03-2021 at 12:00 PM.
Stan Weiss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2021, 12:07 PM   #184
DeuceCoupe
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 267
Likes: 96
Liked 45 Times in 41 Posts
Default Re: Project - NHRA Stock and S/S results 61-68

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stan Weiss View Post
Lets say that was the case. Would someone really build a car for that class @ 8.46? I don't think so. IMO that looks like someone built a car for the 8.50 class and ran really good and got HP that moved them up a class.

Stan


PS the RAV was a small displacement engine for Trans AM like the Z28. I don't think enough were built for it to be NHRA legal.
Agreed on both counts.
The RA2 did run good though so I couldnt rule that out - an over-factored RA2 that ran good even bumped up to B/SA=8.00.

In 1971, Fields' RA2 Bird set the D/S=8.50 record at
11.78 at 119.52
That was a stick car but even make it .2 and 2mph slower for an auto, it's still a winnable combo even up in B/SA=8.00 class of 1969.

That's just the only PONTIAC that even might fit.
If not, then I'm with oldskool, probably not a Pontiac at all.
DeuceCoupe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2021, 12:25 PM   #185
oldskool
VIP Member
 
oldskool's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: The Land of Bayous, Boudin & Crawfish
Posts: 1,668
Likes: 223
Liked 750 Times in 361 Posts
Default Re: Project - NHRA Stock and S/S results 61-68

Quote:
Originally Posted by DeuceCoupe View Post
I thought of a RA4 factored up past its 380hp factoring circa 1970 but that doesnt work because other cars show the RA4 was factored at 380hp since it hit the strip in early 1969.

So the only possible Pontiac that fits is a 68 Bird RA2, factored to 390hp.
I have no basis for that factor other than it makes the car fit.
3300/390=8.46
Any factor less than 390hp will knock the car down into C/SA=8.50 class.

Why would the RA2 be factored to 390hp when the RA4 was only factored at 380hp? Hard to explain.
IF all the info you have from back during that time period is correct, then:

(1) What year could the '68 Bird I posted a pic of have run B/SA ?

(2) What year could the '69 "Hatari" Bird have run B/SA ?

Both obviously DID run B/SA, at least 1 year, at least at 1 track, under some sanctioning body.

When ?
oldskool is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2021, 12:44 PM   #186
DeuceCoupe
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 267
Likes: 96
Liked 45 Times in 41 Posts
Default Re: Project - NHRA Stock and S/S results 61-68

Quote:
Originally Posted by oldskool View Post
IF all the info you have from back during that time period is correct, then:

(1) What year could the '68 Bird I posted a pic of have run B/SA ?

(2) What year could the '69 "Hatari" Bird have run B/SA ?

Both obviously DID run B/SA, at least 1 year, at least at 1 track, under some sanctioning body.

When ?
B/SA=
8.50 in 1968
8.00 in 1969
7.50 in 1970-71
???? 1972
8.50 in 1973-up
So I'd guess those pictures were either 1968 or 1973-up.

But again, I dont KNOW the RA2 "factor" - I had guessed about 375hp prior to this strange Ben Wolf car. That 375hp fits all the other RA2 cars, Fields etc, that I can find. But 375hp wont put Ben Wolf in B/SA=8.00.

I'm with you, starting to think the Ben Wolf car just wasnt a Pontiac.
An L72 Chevelle300 fits (easily mistaken for a GTO LOL) or an L72 Nova is a perfect fit (easily mistaken for a Firebird LOL).
We just dont know WHAT the Ben Wolf B/SA=8.00 car is.
DeuceCoupe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2021, 05:15 PM   #187
Rat Patrol
Member
 
Rat Patrol's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 167
Likes: 66
Liked 31 Times in 26 Posts
Default Re: Project - NHRA Stock and S/S results 61-68

OK gentlemen, thank you for your efforts- I mark it as ‘Firebird ?’ and leave it at that. Its starting to haunt me! 😆
Rat Patrol is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2021, 05:20 PM   #188
Rat Patrol
Member
 
Rat Patrol's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 167
Likes: 66
Liked 31 Times in 26 Posts
Default Re: Project - NHRA Stock and S/S results 61-68

DC - Ive started a fire I need to put out on FB.

Re your 69 Stick results sheet. - It seems the SS/E class for L72 Camaros is just out of whack....when 396 Novas ran in SS/D.

So it raises some questions....

Was the SS/C 69 Camaro of Jenkins actually a 396/375.....or even an L72 - The ZL1suggestion has everyone in a froth! 😆

Further - if Olster ran an L72, what class would it have fit?
Rat Patrol is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2021, 06:57 PM   #189
oldskool
VIP Member
 
oldskool's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: The Land of Bayous, Boudin & Crawfish
Posts: 1,668
Likes: 223
Liked 750 Times in 361 Posts
Default Re: Project - NHRA Stock and S/S results 61-68

"...B/SA=
8.50 in 1968
8.00 in 1969..."

That solves the '68 B/SA pic, for me. Dealers usually ran the cars while they were still the current model year.

According to my math, using an online calculator, a factor of at least 391hp would have been needed to put a '69 Bird into class B. S0, anything from 391 thru 414 would put it into B. 415 would put it into A, & 390 would put it into C, IF my calculations are correct.

So, could it have possibly been 395, 400, 405, or 410, in '69, maybe ?
oldskool is offline   Reply With Quote
Liked
Old 11-03-2021, 10:48 PM   #190
DeuceCoupe
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 267
Likes: 96
Liked 45 Times in 41 Posts
Default Re: Project - NHRA Stock and S/S results 61-68

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rat Patrol View Post
DC - Ive started a fire I need to put out on FB.

Re your 69 Stick results sheet. - It seems the SS/E class for L72 Camaros is just out of whack....when 396 Novas ran in SS/D.

So it raises some questions....

Was the SS/C 69 Camaro of Jenkins actually a 396/375.....or even an L72 - The ZL1suggestion has everyone in a froth! 😆

Further - if Olster ran an L72, what class would it have fit?
OK I will try to get a new account there even though Zuck's customer service is non existent.

Is there a Facebook group where all this excitement is happening?
DeuceCoupe is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:57 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.