HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock Tech
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-05-2011, 08:33 PM   #61
dartman
Member
 
dartman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: N.S. CANADA
Posts: 498
Likes: 155
Liked 68 Times in 41 Posts
Default Re: Is this legal?

If you look hard, you can see that is is bolt on.but are you allowed to weld that brace in? that's the question
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	AntiRoll.jpg
Views:	279
Size:	51.4 KB
ID:	10201  
__________________
1231 FS/D Drag Pak
1231 E/SA 71 Demon
Kelly MacKay

Last edited by dartman; 12-06-2011 at 02:10 PM.
dartman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2011, 08:42 PM   #62
442OLDS
VIP Member
 
442OLDS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Elgin,IL
Posts: 1,333
Likes: 5
Liked 262 Times in 100 Posts
Default Re: Is this legal?

I know the car in question has done well at several IHRA events.

IHRA and NHRA rules are not always the same.Maybe IHRA will have no problem with this?

Last edited by 442OLDS; 12-05-2011 at 08:53 PM. Reason: Might still be legal?
442OLDS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2011, 08:54 PM   #63
Notch1320
Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Yuba City, CA
Posts: 220
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Is this legal?

The real question is... When will the rule book be written clearly? This class has been around for how long now??? How many years of combined experience with this class are tied up in this post alone trying to figure out this one simple rule. The tech department needs to correct the rule book when a clarification is addressed by a racer. Not just relpy via e-mail with a vague answer to the one racer psoing the question. That is how the, "I was told" problems snowballs in the mess we have here today. This statement applies to the roller rocker issue as well.
__________________
Shawn Allsup
K/S 718
Notch1320 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2011, 09:14 PM   #64
Doug Blackley
Member
 
Doug Blackley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Hanover, MA
Posts: 430
Likes: 3
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Re: Is this legal?

Wouldn't be surprised if there is a rule clarification issued soon. Using the stock sway bar works fine and don't have to worry about any issues whether it's legal or not. Factory provided all the mounting points when they built the car.
__________________
Doug Blackley 1697 STK
Doug Blackley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2011, 09:34 PM   #65
Notch1320
Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Yuba City, CA
Posts: 220
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Is this legal?

Update:

Here is the entire days e-mail traffic between myself and Div 7 Tech (Pat Cvengros) Here is what he has to say concerning anti-roll bars.

ME: Pat,

I have a question concerning the use and installation of anti-roll bars in Stock.

Under SUSPENSION, Rear: It states, "Sway bar(s) optional." Is an anti-roll bar considered a sway bar, or a traction device? Both are used to prevent body roll, so what section does it fall under?

Under TRACTION BARS: Can you define "Traction Device"? Is an anti-roll bar a traction device, or suspension item? I ask because the TRACTION BAR section reads: Bolt on traction devices permitted, provided front mounting point is no farther forward that stock mounting point for control arms on coil-spring-cars, or stock front mounting point in rear. Device must be installed under leaf spring and bolt to leaf-spring attaching point in rear. Is this geared towards slapper bars or Caltracs?

The main question I have is can an anti-roll bar be welded in, or does it have to be bolted in? How can/should it be attached to the rear end housing? Can the links be adjustable?

The rule book is very vague on all of this in my opinion, and the majority of Stockers you look under have welded in anti-roll bars along with adjustable links. Only a hand full of them that I have seen are bolted in. Preventing body roll and the ability to adjust it to a particular track, vehicle or condition seems that it would only aid in drivers safety by being able to correct an ill launching vehicle. Welding these in vs. bolting them in would also be a safer way of doing things as well considering 90% of the anti-roll bars available today are weld in and would require extensive modification to "bolt" them in.

Can I get some clarification on this and possibly push for the rule book to be adjusted with clear guidance on this matter to avoid any further confusion.

I think someone may have already posed this question asking...

"I was told I could use an anti-rollbar on the rearend in stock but it had to be a bolt-in unit.
Is it legal to weld in box tubing for mounting the anti-rollbar?"

http://www.competitionplus.com/drag-...via-suspension

I am not sure if the way this question was asked answered the entire topic at hand.

Thank you for your time,

Shawn Allsup

PAT: "NHRA views an anti roll bar and sway bar as the same; and that they be bolted in." As for the article on Competition Plus, that is not acceptable for NHRA Stock Eliminator.

ME: That being said, nothing in the rule book states that a sway bar (anti-roll bar) has to be bolted in. Sway bars are listed under the SUSPENSION section as optional. The rule book should clearly state this!

As I stated earlier, MANY Stock Eliminator cars out there have these parts welded in. People build a car around a set of rules, and those rules need to be clear. If a car shows up to a race and is booted because of a rule that is not specifically stated in the rule book, then what happens? What is keeping that person from going around to every race and looking at every car and pointing out the same issue.

I write regulations and tech manuals for the US military. Items that are vague are left up to interpretation and often lead to a decision being made, and the text changed to reflect. Until it is changed, it is considered legal.

I am just looking for a solid answer/solution to an unclear issue that is currently bouncing around among the racers.

Shawn

PAT: "To be more specific, sway bars are used on the rear end of a vehicle is a traction device, which we do clearly state must be bolted in/on, not welded. I am not aware of any NHRA Stock Eliminator car having a welded sway bar/ anti rotation bar; but I have not seen every single cars that participates either. Items that seem vague in specific class rules are clearly addressed on page XV of the 2011 NHRA Rulebook under HOW TO USE THIS RULEBOOK it reads in part “it is a general rule that unless optional performance equipment or performance related modifications is specifically permitted by this rulebook, it is prohibited.” Therefore it would not be considered legal, as it is with the Military documents you write. With that being said, it does not state any where in the rulebook that you can weld the bar or any associated brackets; so it would be illegal."

So... the "HOW TO USE THIS RULEBOOK" is the catch all. I don't agree with it, or the way the rules are vaguely written, but I'm just a bottom feeder Stock Eliminator racer. I hope this puts some of this to bed concerning the anti-roll bar issue. Now the panhard bar....that is another mess I want no part of.

It looks like myself, and a few other racers have some work to do.
__________________
Shawn Allsup
K/S 718
Notch1320 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2011, 09:48 PM   #66
442OLDS
VIP Member
 
442OLDS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Elgin,IL
Posts: 1,333
Likes: 5
Liked 262 Times in 100 Posts
Default Re: Is this legal?

In the IHRA rulebook for Stock under TRACTION BARS it says coil spring-equipped cars may have strengthened mounting points.

So I guess it is okay if you bolt it to the strengthened mounting point in IHRA?
442OLDS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2011, 10:57 PM   #67
Travis Miller
Member
 
Travis Miller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 476
Likes: 1
Liked 275 Times in 25 Posts
Default Re: Is this legal?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris1529 View Post
need Travis' input.
My input is that Pat Cvengros nailed it with his answer. I must also say that I have only seen bolted in anti-rollbars on NHRA Stock Eliminator cars, none that were welded in...because if I had seen one I would have definitely made an issue out of it!

Looks like it might be time to reinstate my disclaimer.

(Disclaimer: Opinions expressed by me on this forum are exactly that, my opinions.)
Travis Miller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2011, 11:11 PM   #68
Barry Polley
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Vacaville Ca
Posts: 743
Likes: 651
Liked 554 Times in 229 Posts
Default Re: Is this legal?

If they allow this then I want my wheelie bars back.
__________________
Barry Polley 758 A/SA
California- No place to race!
Barry Polley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2011, 11:22 PM   #69
Rich Biebel
VIP Member
 
Rich Biebel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Northern New Jersey suburbs
Posts: 2,275
Likes: 25
Liked 510 Times in 200 Posts
Default Re: Is this legal?

I have a '97 Firebird LT-1 Stocker that was once my car. A friend let me race it a couple times this year. It hooks very well and I have been in the 1.29's with it....Leaves wheels up and no body roll.....

NO WELDED in anything.....

Pete Z bolt on bars......adjustable bolt in torque arm......bolt in torque arm crossmember......STOCK non adjustable panhard bar or lateral locator if you would like to call it and there is also a reinforcement bar that is on there but I think a lot of people remove it....I have it on and have wheelie bars.....

It all needs to be checked for loose bolts or any cracking of brackets....

Both problems have been found in the past.....

I always understood Stocker rear suspension items had to be bolt on only to be legal. NO WELDING.... I wondered how these anti-rollbars or swaybars if you like to call it that could be advertised for stockers and are weld in items.......

I could go a lot further by asking how can some of the new cars be legal........Completely welded in 4 link type rear suspenions from what I recall seeing a couple years ago....and these cars are out racing and accepted.....No or NO ? Which is it.....

So NHRA Tech all of a sudden says no welding or adjustable panhard bars?

Right......

Splain this to me Lucy......
__________________
Rich Biebel
S/C 1479
Rich Biebel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2011, 10:48 AM   #70
dartman
Member
 
dartman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: N.S. CANADA
Posts: 498
Likes: 155
Liked 68 Times in 41 Posts
Default Re: Is this legal?

After reading"HOW TO USE THIS RULEBOOK" ,what I got out of it was in short is "just because it doesn't say you can't,doesn't mean you can."
__________________
1231 FS/D Drag Pak
1231 E/SA 71 Demon
Kelly MacKay
dartman is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:33 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.