|
![]() |
#81 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Fife, Washington
Posts: 1,958
Likes: 2,375
Liked 2,868 Times in 691 Posts
|
![]()
Stock Eliminator is so diluted now, that it has lost some of it's interest for me.
I love cars that still look like cars that came of the showroom floor. NOT looking forward to the day that the class becomes - - Stock Appearing Eliminator. Without consistent TECH at events that is where we are headed. YES, I know that the cost of consistent, reliable tech inspections is OUT OF SIGHT. With all the cars that now run in the class, it would be nearly impossible to train the personnel needed and to have available all the info needed would be overwhelming. Plus NHRA doesn't really care.
__________________
Ron McDowell - Did Race Every day is a Gift - Enjoy with family and friends. |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#82 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,090
Likes: 1,534
Liked 1,752 Times in 398 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
It depends. For example, if you wanted to run a 67 L-88 Corvette, the number is 50, and only 36 were officially sold. There are some cars that were never built, some factory race cars that a complete engine was never actually built. Go figure. Rules are for "little people".
__________________
Alan Roehrich 212A G/S |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#83 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2020
Posts: 504
Likes: 527
Liked 484 Times in 235 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
See...? Looks just like a Turbo 400... |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#84 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Woodburn, Or
Posts: 679
Likes: 77
Liked 786 Times in 240 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#85 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 161
Likes: 42
Liked 179 Times in 58 Posts
|
![]()
I noticed in rule book that you can not run a aluminum center section in the 9" rear end unless it cam from factory. meaning no mark william's Plus rule does not allow 12 bolt rears in that car. plus no aluminum or carbon fiber drive shafts unless available from factory. But i'm sure nhra will change this for that car just like they allow crate motors in copos
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#86 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Farmington, New Mexico
Posts: 201
Likes: 257
Liked 166 Times in 50 Posts
|
![]()
No worries folks that BMW engine will be leaking oil like a sieve after a couple of races. We have a 328i, I know. 😵*💫
__________________
Kelly Lane Stk4991 |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#87 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: from Vancouver BC Canada, now in Nova Scotia
Posts: 1,298
Likes: 297
Liked 1,073 Times in 293 Posts
|
![]()
Much like the LT1 powered Camaros and Firebirds (with Ford Pinto rack and pinion steering to boot!) that were allowed a year after the LS engine replaced the LT1 in production cars. As for the 500 minimum production number required to be eligible for Stock or S/S, guessing that went out the window about the same time that all the zero sold to the general public, "Paper" cars were allowed in. Like the factory COPO, Drag Pak Challengers, and Cobra Jet Mustangs were sold with engines, transmissions, and rearends that were totally different than what the showroom available street cars were available with. Plus at that time, the Thunderbolt, and several other combinations, had a power per weight ratio below 8.0, which at the time, was the highest allowed in Stock. So, again, to allow the "Paper" cars to play, the power to weight ratio requirements were changed to make room for the 7.99 and less cars that could run in Super Stock, now fit into Stock.
__________________
NHRA 6390 STK M/S 85 Mustang |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#88 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2024
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 537
Likes: 1,514
Liked 1,126 Times in 314 Posts
|
![]()
Then just run slower than M. That's what I did. I was/am new to class racing so I entered in a spot that made sense. Wanna go faster? Nobody is stopping you but your own willingness to put up the money and time it takes to do so.
__________________
Dawson Pauley #2827 N/SA 1980 Malibu SW 2S 305/180 #2827 S/ST 1978 Mazda RX7 w/ 383 sbc/glide |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#89 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2024
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 537
Likes: 1,514
Liked 1,126 Times in 314 Posts
|
![]()
This thread and the introduction of a new manufacturer has been very exciting and a great read! Semantics about this car's legality aside, it is awesome to see a new player in STK. I'm 25, and it is so great to see a real car that you can actually go out and buy that isn't a FS car be added to the guide. I sincerely hope this starts a trend of adding lots of new cars to the guide, imports and domestics from the year 2000 and beyond. some of you older guys have been racing STK for so long that you're used to being surrounded by the cars of your youth. Well this Supra and other imports like it are the cars of my youth. I'm happy Gump could bring just one of them to life and competition.
EDIT: That being said, both of my race cars are 1979 and 1980 models so I realize I'm not exactly practicing what I preach, but I enjoy the cars I have and look forward to seeing new ones too!
__________________
Dawson Pauley #2827 N/SA 1980 Malibu SW 2S 305/180 #2827 S/ST 1978 Mazda RX7 w/ 383 sbc/glide |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#90 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: The Lowcountry.
Posts: 2,954
Likes: 2,536
Liked 2,610 Times in 948 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|