|
![]() |
#81 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: NS CANADA
Posts: 898
Likes: 1,670
Liked 395 Times in 154 Posts
|
![]()
Anybody notice most of the masks (including those used by officials) were 3M??LOL!
I love capitalism! They do the dirty building of stuff we want and we sell them the protection to keep working in dirty conditions to build the stuff we want, lol win-win. ok a bit sarcastic but, England learned in the 1800's how bad coal fired everything was...China is now figuring it out. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#82 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Cumming GA
Posts: 1,992
Likes: 1,293
Liked 1,436 Times in 299 Posts
|
![]()
Bruce, suppression of our citizens right to vote is unfair. True. However, just as contributing our voice through voting is important, I think it is also important to offer our voice in these matters that can affect us. If we do not, we have only ourselves to blame.
Well intentioned people in positions of authority may have a focused goal to improve emissions. That is a worthy cause. However, low or no impact scenarios like ours can be affected because of the EPA being unaware of these consequences. I am not talking big money lobbyists. I am talking racers just like us. For example, imagine if you hired an accountant to secure your children's inheritance and gave them full authority over your assets to complete this one, defined mission. You would wake up and find your entire racing operation and many other quality of life activities that are clearly not needed to be divested. Now, it isn't that accountants are bad people. They only fulfilled the mission under the ground.rules they were given. (Which was none in my example). So, you find out all of the fun stuff you had in life, your race car and all supporting equipment was long gone. When you confront the accountant to ask why in the @!#- he did that, he would only say "sorry, I didn't know" All I can say is that this scenario would cut across any political spectrum. I would encourage thoughtful and productive communication to your representatives. Quote:
__________________
James Schaechter 3163 STK Last edited by james schaechter; 02-13-2016 at 02:31 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#83 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
This is the meat of the whole problem they tried to slip this past us.
The EPA is proposing regulation that will have a broad impact on the aftermarket/performance automotive industry in this country. Hidden in the proposal which is titled Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Fuel Efficiency Standards for Medium and Heavy-Duty Engines and Vehicles; Phase 2 There is a section that drives at the heart of a long standing American culture, this being the modification of cars for off-road and competition use. I find it very dishonest to title a proposal for Medium and Heavy Duty eninges and then slip in something that will impact a great many people under this guise. Here is the paragraph I'm referring to 67. Section 86.1854-12 is amended by adding paragraph (b)(5) to read as follows: _ 86.1854-12 Prohibited acts. * * * * * (b) * * * (5) Certified motor vehicles and motor vehicle engines and their emission control devices must remain in their certified configuration even if they are used solely for competition or if they become nonroad vehicles or engines; anyone modifying a certified motor vehicle or motor vehicle engine for any reason is subject to the tampering and defeat device prohibitions of paragraph (a)(3) of this section and 42 U.S.C. 7522(a)(3). |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#84 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 928
Likes: 1
Liked 120 Times in 42 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Last edited by davidhuff; 02-13-2016 at 03:48 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#85 | |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Upper Holland, PA
Posts: 423
Likes: 27
Liked 216 Times in 88 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Jim
__________________
Jim Samuel |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#86 | |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Upper Holland, PA
Posts: 423
Likes: 27
Liked 216 Times in 88 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Jim
__________________
Jim Samuel |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#87 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Bridgeport,CT.
Posts: 1,993
Likes: 1,666
Liked 2,638 Times in 440 Posts
|
![]()
I just signed another petition concerning this matter on the PowerNation TV website.
Here is a link - http://powernationtv.com/post/say-no...to-motorsports I sincerely hope that everyone that reads this forum will sign this petition.
__________________
Bill Seabrooks - superfan1 Bridgeport, CT |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#88 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Fulton County, PA
Posts: 615
Likes: 17
Liked 920 Times in 259 Posts
|
![]()
Federal certification, which is what we are talking about, began in the late '60s as part of the Clean Air Act. That is how far back they can go with this, if they so chose.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#89 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,855
Likes: 83
Liked 444 Times in 145 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Jim, we moved from the apples to the orange basket. I absolutely agree that we have the right to speak out about any issue. My point is that I don't buy into all this draconian BS that some of these guys are floating out here.
__________________
Bruce Noland 1788 STK |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#90 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Arkansas - In the middle of everything.
Posts: 2,001
Likes: 64
Liked 780 Times in 194 Posts
|
![]()
Bruce, probably your side of the argument would be represented better if you would lay off the ad hominem references. Nobody appreciates being addressed as "conspiracy theory wing nuts" or their fears and beliefs as "draconian BS" or talked down to. There is very real concern when authorities with no oversight have the full force of the government when making rules an regulations that affect real people's lives with no recourse. There are 57 commercial fishermen and three private marinas in Arkansas that are being threatened with fines and jail time if they do not cease their operations due to the EPA ruling that was handed down last year. You may be correct that the EPA would not enforce the regulation as it is written, but the fact is that they could and we would have no recourse. We might then mount an objection and fight to overturn the regulation, but it would be after many, many people would be affected. It's like the IRS bringing charges against you for tax violations, you may be innocent and be able to prove it, but the legal costs and loss of revenue during the fight would be devastating. The IRS is simply going to say "sorry" and you have no recourse for compensation.
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|