|
![]() |
#41 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Newport News, VA
Posts: 1,435
Likes: 371
Liked 129 Times in 59 Posts
|
![]()
I wasn't really sure WHY the NHRA re-instated the pre-1960 vehicles when Chevy and Cadillac were the only manufacturers that had listings in the classification guide. I've been told on more than one occasion that if a racer wants to race a certain combination not listed in the guide it's his or her responsibility to petition the Committee not the Manufacturer. So maybe if enough of us make a reasonable request to the NHRA this oversight will be corrected.
I couldn't agree more with Aubrey and dakahuna - Old Cars (and Old Folks) RULE! ![]() Lew
__________________
Lew Silverman #2070 "The Wagon Master" N/SA |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#42 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 22
Likes: 9
Liked 4 Times in 2 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
I think the 57 283 combination's are factored pretty fair. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#43 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 235
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 4 Posts
|
![]()
Just for curiosity sake, where are the engine specs on the 55-59 Cadillac? NHRA lists engine specs for 55-59 Chevy, 49-59 Oldsmobile, and 55-59 Pontiac, but not the Cadillac and they say the Cadillacs are allowed to race.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#44 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Whittier, Ca
Posts: 830
Likes: 94
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
![]()
The 57 150 is a N/SA, O/SA and P/SA. You forgot the powerglide weight. I would use the Rochester carb not the wcfb.. It will compete very well in O/SA at 3395 pounds
__________________
Tony Janes 7941 STK, SS |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#45 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 384
Likes: 101
Liked 419 Times in 85 Posts
|
![]()
If I had the time. I would do a 1957 Chevrolet. I think people would be very surprised how good one would run. It is just a 50k deal but the second you rolled into the staging lanes no one would even notice a cobra jet or challenger.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#46 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 761
Likes: 16
Liked 633 Times in 88 Posts
|
![]()
Steve you can’t tell me a 1955 Chevy with 265ci and rated at 205hp can’t run mid to low thirteen’s. You only haft to scale around 3500 pounds.
Captain jacks 1960 283ci Kingswood runs 13.80s at 4400 pounds
__________________
Charley Downing 3548 STK Last edited by Charley Downing; 12-21-2011 at 03:06 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#47 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 425
Likes: 1
Liked 52 Times in 9 Posts
|
![]()
Doug , no disrespect , but with todays parts I think i could pick -up more than4 tenths in 40 years .
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#48 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Whittier, Ca
Posts: 830
Likes: 94
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
![]()
Here are the numbers on the 55 Bel Air . It runs P/SA QSA and R/SA at 180 hp. In Q it has to weigh 3230 and in R it has to weigh 3410 Since the Hurly car all ready run 13.80's in P/SA at 205 hp, 3460 pounds, it should do fine in R/SA. The stock hp of 180 is a good starting point.
__________________
Tony Janes 7941 STK, SS |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#49 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 761
Likes: 16
Liked 633 Times in 88 Posts
|
![]()
Make it 150hp while were at it. So they don't haft to spend any money or time working out this combo, it will now be the king of T/SA and U/SA with a stroke of a pen. At the end of the day you are all just beating a dead horse because less 5 people care about a 1955 in stk.
You can trust me with your life, but not your money or your wife
__________________
Charley Downing 3548 STK Last edited by Charley Downing; 12-21-2011 at 03:40 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#50 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Whittier, Ca
Posts: 830
Likes: 94
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
![]()
Charley the stroke of the pen days are gone. Another thought how many 210 281 ci Fords are there?
__________________
Tony Janes 7941 STK, SS |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|