|
![]() |
#31 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,128
Likes: 1,084
Liked 184 Times in 113 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#32 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Pontiac,il.
Posts: 1,198
Likes: 280
Liked 959 Times in 192 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#33 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Sapulpa, OK
Posts: 92
Likes: 127
Liked 168 Times in 30 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#34 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Boulder City, Nevada 89005
Posts: 2,729
Likes: 2,785
Liked 2,463 Times in 695 Posts
|
![]()
318 1980 Aspen Coupe SS/MA
318 1978 Aspen Wagon N/SA 360 1980 Dodge Ram N/SA 340 71 Demon E/SA 340/400 73 Roadrunner I/SA These are it for me at the moment My son Runs several also.
__________________
John Irving 741 Stock 741 Super Stock |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#35 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Alabama
Posts: 81
Likes: 1
Liked 22 Times in 9 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#36 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Richmond Hill GA (and Port Ludlow WA)
Posts: 4,293
Likes: 2,367
Liked 3,165 Times in 969 Posts
|
![]()
Some of his shops are, others aren?t LOL. John gave me a tour a few years back?I?m still amazed.
__________________
Jim Carter 2340 Super Stock 2340 SST/2340 Stock Set another place at the table |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#37 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Georgetown, Indiana (close to Louisville, KY)
Posts: 775
Likes: 530
Liked 230 Times in 106 Posts
|
![]()
I see on the hp adjustments they changed the hp rating on a 68 Corvette 327/325 motor. That's a mistake. They never made that combination in the Corvette. Are they talking the 327/350 stick only combo?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#38 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Hampden, MA
Posts: 1,201
Likes: 233
Liked 772 Times in 164 Posts
|
![]()
They lowered the 325 hp motor in the Chevelle and Nova, so I would guess that you are correct. In the Corvette the 350hp/327 motor is the same as the other 2 bodys I believe. They just rated it at 350 because it is in the corvette.
__________________
Dave Casey 1330 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#39 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,103
Likes: 56
Liked 464 Times in 113 Posts
|
![]()
Dave is correct. Looking at the blueprint specs on the 327/350 in the Corvette and comparing it to the Nova/Chevelle 327/325 motor it appears they are identical Just the Corvette was rated higher for what ever reason. And yes it is a stick only motor.
__________________
68 Chevy11 327 F/S |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#40 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Texarkana Ark/TX
Posts: 2,446
Likes: 575
Liked 880 Times in 311 Posts
|
![]()
Bob,
Through all the 60 years I've been racing I have always heard the Corvette ratings were higher on like combinations because of the Stock Exhaust manifolds and the Stock Pan configuration. For the life of me I can't see how a Exhaust Manifold difference in all classes that allow aftermarket headers is even a consideration for HP variations. Now a Stocker with a Stocker pan.. I can see that there could be a difference...In Super Stock and Super Stock GT where aftermarket pans are allowed I don't see any reason to add HP to "like" engine combinations. Is NHRA Tech going back to some wheelbase considerations like in the old days with Ford and Mopar??
__________________
Adger Smith (Former SS) |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
|
|